Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

A conceptual framework for assessing the ecosystem service of waste remediation: in the marine environment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Stephen C. L. Watson, David M. Paterson, Ana M. Queirós, Andrew P. Rees, Nicholas Stephens, Stephen Widdicombe, Nicola J. Beaumont

School/Research organisations

Abstract

In the marine environment, the ecosystem service of Waste Remediation (WR) enables humans to utilise the natural functioning of ecosystems to process and detoxify a large number of waste products and therefore avoid harmful effects on human wellbeing and the environment. Despite its importance, to date the service has been poorly defined in ecosystem service classifications and rarely valued or quantified. This paper therefore addresses a gap in the literature regarding the application of this key, but poorly documented ecosystem service. Here we present a conceptual framework by which the ecosystem service of WR can be identified, placed into context within current ecosystem classifications and assessed. A working definition of WR in the marine context is provided as is an overview of the different waste types entering the marine environment. Processes influencing the provisioning of WR are categorised according to how they influence the input, cycling/detoxification, sequestration/storage and export of wastes, with operational indicators for these processes discussed. Finally a discussion of the wider significance of the service of WR is given, including how we can maximise the benefits received from it. It is noted that many methods used in the assessment, quantification and valuation of the service are currently hampered due to the benefits of the service often not being tangible assets set in the market and/or due to a lack of information surrounding the processes providing the service. Conclusively this review finds WR to be an under researched but critically important ecosystem service and provides a first attempt at providing operational guidance on the long term sustainable use of WR in marine environments.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)69-81
Number of pages13
JournalEcosystem Services
Volume20
Early online date21 Jul 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2016

    Research areas

  • Ecosystem services, Waste remediation, Marine, Shelf-seas, Human wellbeing

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Integrating field and laboratory approaches for ripple development in mixed sand–clay–EPS

    Baas, J. H., Baker, M. L., Malarkey, J., Bass, S. J., Manning, A. J., Hope, J. A., Peakall, J., Lichtman, I. D., Ye, L., Davies, A. G., Parsons, D. R., Paterson, D. M. & Thorne, P. D., 5 Jun 2019, In : Sedimentology. Early View, 20 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Factors affecting the spatial and temporal distribution of E. coli in intertidal estuarine sediments

    Wyness, A. J., Paterson, D. M., Mendo, T., Defew, E. C., Stutter, M. I. & Avery, L. M., 15 Apr 2019, In : Science of the Total Environment. 661, p. 155-167

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Chemical dispersant enhances microbial exopolymer (EPS) production and formation of marine oil/dispersant snow in surface waters of the subarctic northeast Atlantic

    Suja, L. D., Chen, X., Summers, S., Paterson, D. M. & Gutierrez, T., 20 Mar 2019, In : Frontiers in Microbiology. 10, 13 p., 553.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. The effect of cyclic variation of shear stress on non-cohesive sediment stabilization by microbial biofilms: the role of ‘biofilm precursors’

    Chen, X., Zhang, C., Paterson, D. M., Townend, I. H., Jin, C., Zhou, Z., Gong, Z. & Feng, Q., 1 Feb 2019, In : Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. Early View, 11 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Comparing the network structure and resilience of two benthic estuarine systems following the implementation of nutrient mitigation actions

    Watson, S. C. L., Beaumont, N. J., Widdicombe, S. & Paterson, D. M., 7 Jan 2019, In : Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. In press

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Measuring the economic value of pollination services: principles, evidence and knowledge gaps

    Hanley, N. D., Breeze, T. D., Ellis, C. & Goulson, D., Aug 2015, In : Ecosystem Services. 14, p. 124-132 9 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. What can deliberative approaches bring to the monetary valuation of ecosystem services? A literature review

    Bunse, L., Rendon, O. & Luque, S., Aug 2015, In : Ecosystem Services. 14, p. 88-97 10 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. A framework for valuing spatially targeted peatland restoration

    Glenk, K., Schaafsma, M., Moxey, A., Martin-Ortega, J. & Hanley, N., 3 Apr 2013, In : Ecosystem Services.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 244482244