Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

A dive counting density estimation method for Blainville's beaked whale (Mesoplodon densirostris) using a bottom-mounted hydrophone field as applied to a Mid-Frequency Active (MFA) sonar operation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

D. Moretti, Tiago Andre Lamas Oliveira Marques, L. Thomas, N. DiMarzio, A. Dilley, R. Morrissey, E. McCarthy, J. Ward, S. Jarvis

School/Research organisations

Abstract

We present a passive acoustic method for estimating the density of echolocating cetaceans that dive synchronously, based on isolation of dive starts using a field of distributed bottom-mounted hydrophones. The method assumes that all dive starts of the target species within a defined area are detected, and that independent estimates of dive rate and group size are available. We apply the method to estimate the density of Blainville’s beaked whales (Mesoplodon densirostris) at the Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center (AUTEC) in the Bahamas during the time of a multi-ship active sonar exercise. Estimated densities for the 65 h before the exercise, 68 h during, 65 h after, and the final 43 h monitored were 16.99 (95% CI 13.47–21.43), 4.76 (3.78–6.00), 8.67 (6.87–10.94), and 24.75 (19.62–31.23) respectively, illustrating a possible avoidance reaction. Results for the 65 h before were compared with those from the click count density estimation algorithm developed by Marques et al. [Marques T, Thomas L, Ward J, DiMarzio N, Tyack P. Estimating cetacean population density using fixed passive acoustic sensors. An example with Blainville’s beaked whales. J Acoust Soc Am 2009;125(4):1982–1994]. The click count-based estimate was 19.23 animals/1000 km2 (95% CI 12.69–29.13)—similar (13% higher), but with higher variance (CV 21% for click count method versus 12% for the dive count method). We discuss potential reasons for the differences, and compare the utility of the two methods. For both, obtaining reliable estimates of the factors that scale the measured quantity (dive starts or detected clicks) to density is the key hurdle. Defining the area monitored in the dive count method can also be problematic, particularly if the array is small.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1036-1042
JournalApplied Acoustics
Volume71
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2010

    Research areas

  • Bioacoustics, Cue counting, Estimating animal abundance, Passive acoustic monitoring

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Evaluating the effect of measurement error in pairs of 3D bearings in point transect sampling estimates of density

    Marques, T. A., Duarte, P., Peixe, T., Moretti, D. & Thomas, L., 27 Mar 2018, University of St Andrews. 72 p. (CREEM Technical Report; no. 2018-1)

    Research output: Book/ReportOther report

  2. Comparing methods suitable for monitoring marine mammals in low visibility conditions during seismic surveys

    Verfuss, U. K., Gillespie, D., Gordon, J., Marques, T. A., Miller, B., Plunkett, R., Theriault, J. A., Tollit, D. J., Zitterbart, D. P., Hubert, P. & Thomas, L., Jan 2018, In : Marine Pollution Bulletin. 126, p. 1-18 18 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

  3. Techniques for estimating the size of low-density gopher tortoise populations

    Stober, J. M., Prieto-Gonzalez, R., Smith, L. L., Marques, T. A. & Thomas, L., 1 Dec 2017, In : Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management. 8, 2, p. 377-386 10 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Estimation bias under model selection for distance sampling detection functions

    Prieto Gonzalez, R., Thomas, L. & Marques, T. A., Sep 2017, In : Environmental and Ecological Statistics. 24, 3, p. 399-414 16 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Model-based approaches to deal with detectability: a comment on Hutto (2016a)

    Marques, T. A., Thomas, L., Kery, M., Buckland, S. T., Borchers, D. L., Rexstad, E., Fewster, R. M., Mackenzie, D. I., Royle, J. A., Guillera-Arroita, G., Handel, C. M., Pavlacky, D. C. & Camp, R. J., Jul 2017, In : Ecological Applications. 27, 5, p. 1694-1698 5 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

Related by journal

  1. Comparison of beaked whale detection algorithms

    Yack, T. M., Barlow, J., Roch, M. A., Klinck, H., Martin, S., Mellinger, D. K. & Gillespie, D., Nov 2010, In : Applied Acoustics . 71, 11, p. 1043-1049 7 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Overview of the 2005 workshop on detection and localization of marine mammals using passive acoustics

    Adam, O., Motsch, J-F., Desharnais, F., DiMarzio, N., Gillespie, D. & Gisiner, R. C., Nov 2006, In : Applied Acoustics . 67, p. 1061-1070 10 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

ID: 3401926