Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

A framework for the evaluation of new interventional procedures

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Author(s)

Tania Lourenco, Adrian M. Grant, Jennifer M. Burr, Luke Vale

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Objectives: The introduction of new interventional procedures is less regulated than for other health technologies such as pharmaceuticals. Decisions are often taken on evidence of efficacy and short-term safety from small-scale usually observational studies. This reflects the particular challenges of evaluating interventional procedures – the extra facets of skill and training and the difficulty defining a 'new‘ technology. Currently, there is no framework to evaluate new interventional procedures before they become available in clinical practice as opposed to new pharmaceuticals. This paper proposes a framework to guide the evaluation of a new interventional procedure.

Proposed framework: A framework was developed consisting of a four-stage progressive evaluation for a new interventional procedure: Stage 1: Development; Stage 2: Efficacy and short-term safety; Stage 3: Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness; and Stage 4: Implementation. The framework also suggests the types of studies or data collection methods that can be used to satisfy each stage.

Conclusions: This paper makes a first step on a framework for generating evidence on new interventional procedures. The difficulties and limitations of applying such a framework are discussed.

Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)234-240
Number of pages7
JournalHealth Policy
Volume104
Issue number3
Early online date21 Nov 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2012

    Research areas

  • New interventional procedures, Medical devices, Evaluation, Innovation, Framework

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Interpretation of change scores for the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25: the minimally important difference

    Burr, J. M., Cooper, D., Ramsay, C. R., Che Hamzah, J. & Azuara-Blanco, A., 18 May 2021, (E-pub ahead of print) In: British Journal of Ophthalmology.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Primary trabeculectomy for advanced glaucoma: pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial (TAGS)

    TAGS Study Group, King, A. J., Hudson, J., Fernie, G., Kernohan, A., Azuara-Blanco, A., Burr, J., Homer, T., Shabaninejad, H., Sparrow, J. M., Garway-Heath, D., Barton, K., Norrie, J., McDonald, A., Vale, L., MacLennan, G. & Kousha, O., 12 May 2021, In: BMJ. 373, 11 p., n1014.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Effect of corneal cross-linking versus standard care on keratoconus progression in young patients: the KERALINK randomized controlled trial

    Keralink Trial Study Group, Larkin, D. F. P., Chowdhury, K., Burr, J. M., Raynor, M., Edwards, M., Tuft, S. J., Bunce, C., Caverly, E. & Doré, C., 21 Apr 2021, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Ophthalmology. In Press, 11 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Trends in diabetic retinopathy screening attendance and associations with vision impairment attributable to diabetes in a large nationwide cohort

    Lawrenson, J. G., Bourmpaki, E., Bunce, C., Stratton, I. M., Gardner, P., Anderson, J. & EROS Study Group, Apr 2021, In: Diabetic Medicine. 38, 4, 11 p., e14425.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  5. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared with phacoemulsification: the FACT non-inferiority RCT

    Day, A. C., Burr, J. M., Bennett, K., Hunter, R., Bunce, C., Doré, C. J., Nanavaty, M. A., Balaggan, K. S. & Wilkins, M. R., 1 Jan 2021, In: Health Technology Assessment. 25, 6, p. 1-68 68 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Between a rock and a hard place: comparing arms' length bodies for public involvement in healthcare across the UK

    Stewart, E., Ercia, A., Greer, S. L. & Donnelly, P. D., Apr 2020, In: Health Policy. 124, 4, p. 454-461 8 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. The introduction of new interventional procedures in the British National Health Service: A qualitative study

    Lourenco, T., Grant, A. M., Burr, J. M. & Vale, L., Apr 2011, In: Health Policy. 100, 1, p. 35-42 8 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Implementation of electronic medical records in hospitals: two case studies

    Øvretveit, J., Scott, J. T., Rundall, TG., Shortell, S. & Brommels, M., Dec 2007, In: Health Policy. 84, 2, p. 181-190 10 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 22155483

Top