Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

A new look at joint attention and common knowledge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Everyone agrees that joint attention is a key feature of human social cognition. Yet, despite over 40 years of work and hundreds of publications on this topic, there is still surprisingly little agreement on what exactly joint attention is, and how the jointness in it is achieved. Part of the problem, we propose, is that joint attention is not a single process, but rather it includes a cluster of different cognitive skills and processes, and different researchers focus on different aspects of it. A similar problem applies to common knowledge. Here we present a new approach: We outline a typology of social attention levels which are currently all referred to in the literature as joint attention (from monitoring to common, mutual, and shared attention), along with corresponding levels of common knowledge. We consider cognitive, behavioral, and phenomenological aspects of the different levels as well as their different functions, and a key distinction we make in all of this is second-personal vs. third-personal relations. While we focus mainly on joint attention and common knowledge, we also briefly discuss how these levels might apply to other ‘joint’ mental states such as joint goals.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)260-274
Number of pages15
JournalCognition
Volume189
Early online date20 Apr 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2019

    Research areas

  • Joint attention, Common knowledge, Second-person relations, Communication, Joint action, Commitments

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Common knowledge that help is needed increases helping behavior in children

    Siposova, B., Grueneisen, S., Helming, K., Tomasello, M. & Carpenter, M., Jan 2021, In: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 201, 104973.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Communicative eye contact signals a commitment to cooperate for young children

    Siposova, B., Tomasello, M. & Carpenter, M., Oct 2018, In: Cognition. 179, p. 192-201

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Selective copying of the majority suggests children are broadly "optimal-" rather than "over-" imitators

    Evans, C. L., Laland, K. N., Carpenter, M. & Kendal, R. L., 29 Aug 2018, In: Developmental Science. 21, 5, e12637.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Joint action and joint attention: drawing parallels between the literatures

    Milward, S. & Carpenter, M., 26 Mar 2018, In: Social and Personality Psychology Compass. Early View, e12377.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  5. The whistleblower’s dilemma in young children: when loyalty trumps other moral concerns

    Misch, A., Over, H. & Carpenter, M., 1 Mar 2018, In: Frontiers in Psychology. 9, 9 p., 250.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Cognition (Journal)

    Josep Call (Member of editorial board)

    2015 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  2. Cognition (Journal)

    Malinda Carpenter (Editor)

    1 Jul 201331 Dec 2014

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

Related by journal

  1. Attentional coordination in demonstrator-observer dyads facilitates learning and predicts performance in a novel manual task

    Pagnotta, M., Laland, K. N. & Coco, M. I., Aug 2020, In: Cognition. 201, 104314.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Communicative eye contact signals a commitment to cooperate for young children

    Siposova, B., Tomasello, M. & Carpenter, M., Oct 2018, In: Cognition. 179, p. 192-201

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Intuitive statistical inferences in chimpanzees and humans follow Weber‘s Law

    Eckert, J., Call, J., Hermes, J., Herrmann, E. & Rakoczy, H., Nov 2018, In: Cognition. 180, p. 99-107 9 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. The social-cognitive basis of infants’ reference to absent entities

    Bohn, M., Zimmermann, L., Call, J. & Tomasello, M., Aug 2018, In: Cognition. 177, p. 41-48 8 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 258686813

Top