Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

A new look at joint attention and common knowledge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Open Access Status

  • Embargoed (until 20/04/20)

Abstract

Everyone agrees that joint attention is a key feature of human social cognition. Yet, despite over 40 years of work and hundreds of publications on this topic, there is still surprisingly little agreement on what exactly joint attention is, and how the jointness in it is achieved. Part of the problem, we propose, is that joint attention is not a single process, but rather it includes a cluster of different cognitive skills and processes, and different researchers focus on different aspects of it. A similar problem applies to common knowledge. Here we present a new approach: We outline a typology of social attention levels which are currently all referred to in the literature as joint attention (from monitoring to common, mutual, and shared attention), along with corresponding levels of common knowledge. We consider cognitive, behavioral, and phenomenological aspects of the different levels as well as their different functions, and a key distinction we make in all of this is second-personal vs. third-personal relations. While we focus mainly on joint attention and common knowledge, we also briefly discuss how these levels might apply to other ‘joint’ mental states such as joint goals.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)260-274
Number of pages15
JournalCognition
Volume189
Early online date20 Apr 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2019

    Research areas

  • Joint attention, Common knowledge, Second-person relations, Communication, Joint action, Commitments

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Communicative eye contact signals a commitment to cooperate for young children

    Siposova, B., Tomasello, M. & Carpenter, M., Oct 2018, In : Cognition. 179, p. 192-201

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Selective copying of the majority suggests children are broadly "optimal-" rather than "over-" imitators

    Evans, C. L., Laland, K. N., Carpenter, M. & Kendal, R. L., 29 Aug 2018, In : Developmental Science. 21, 5, e12637.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Joint action and joint attention: drawing parallels between the literatures

    Milward, S. & Carpenter, M., 26 Mar 2018, In : Social and Personality Psychology Compass. Early View, e12377.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. The whistleblower’s dilemma in young children: when loyalty trumps other moral concerns

    Misch, A., Over, H. & Carpenter, M., 1 Mar 2018, In : Frontiers in Psychology. 9, 9 p., 250.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Great apes distinguish true from false beliefs in an interactive helping task

    Buttelmann, D., Buttelmann, F., Carpenter, M., Call, J. & Tomasello, M., 5 Apr 2017, In : PLoS One. 12, 4, 13 p., e0173793.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Cognition (Journal)

    Josep Call (Member of editorial board)
    2015 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  2. Cognition (Journal)

    Malinda Carpenter (Editor)
    1 Jul 201331 Dec 2014

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

Related by journal

  1. Communicative eye contact signals a commitment to cooperate for young children

    Siposova, B., Tomasello, M. & Carpenter, M., Oct 2018, In : Cognition. 179, p. 192-201

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Intuitive statistical inferences in chimpanzees and humans follow Weber‘s Law

    Eckert, J., Call, J., Hermes, J., Herrmann, E. & Rakoczy, H., Nov 2018, In : Cognition. 180, p. 99-107 9 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. The social-cognitive basis of infants’ reference to absent entities

    Bohn, M., Zimmermann, L., Call, J. & Tomasello, M., Aug 2018, In : Cognition. 177, p. 41-48 8 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Own attractiveness and perceived relationship quality shape sensitivity in women’s memory for other men on the attractiveness dimension

    Watkins, C. D., Nicholls, M. J., Batres, C., Xiao, D., Talamas, S. & Perrett, D. I., Jun 2017, In : Cognition. 163, p. 146-154 8 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 258686813

Top