Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

A review of factors to consider when using camera traps to study animal behavior to inform wildlife ecology and conservation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DOI

Open Access permissions

Open

Author(s)

Anthony Caravaggi, A. Cole Burton, Douglas A. Clark, Jason T. Fisher, Amelia Grass, Sian Green, Catherine Hobaiter, Tim R. Hofmeester, Ammie K. Kalan, Daniella Rabaiotti, Danielle Rivet

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Camera traps (CTs) are an increasingly popular method of studying animal behavior. However, the impact of cameras on detected individuals—such as from mechanical noise, odor, and emitted light—has received relatively little attention. These impacts are particularly important in behavioral studies in conservation that seek to ascribe changes in behavior to relevant environmental factors. In this article, we discuss three sources of bias that are relevant to conservation behavior studies using CTs: (a) disturbance caused by cameras; (b) variation in animal‐detection parameters across camera models; and (c) biased detection across individuals and age, sex, and behavioral classes. We propose several recommendations aimed at mitigating responses to CTs by wildlife. Our recommendations offer a platform for the development of more rigorous and robust behavioral studies using CT technology and, if adopted, would result in greater applied benefits for conservation and management.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere239
Number of pages9
JournalConservation Science and Practice
VolumeEarly View
Early online date19 Jun 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 19 Jun 2020

    Research areas

  • Conservation behavior, Management, Observer bias, Remote sensing, Wildlife

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Chimpanzee lip-smacks confirm primate continuity for speech-rhythm evolution

    Pereira, A. S., Kavanagh, E., Hobaiter, C., Slocombe, K. E. & R. Lameira, A., 27 May 2020, In : Biology Letters. 16, 5, 20200232.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. The importance of being in situ

    Hobaiter, C., 9 Mar 2020, In : Current Biology. 30, 5, p. R199-R201 3 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article review

  3. Maternal cannibalism in two populations of wild chimpanzees

    Fedurek, P., Tkaczynski, P., Asiimwe, C., Hobaiter, C., Samuni, L., Lowe, A. E., Dijrian, A. G., Zuberbühler, K., Wittig, R. M. & Crockford, C., 5 Oct 2019, In : Primates. First Online, 7 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Scleral pigmentation leads to conspicuous, not cryptic, eye morphology in chimpanzees

    Perea-García, J. O., Kret, M. E., Monteiro, A. & Hobaiter, C., 3 Sep 2019, In : Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Latest Articles, 3 p., 201911410 .

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Gesture use in communication between mothers and offspring in wild orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) from the Sabangau peat-swamp forest, Borneo

    Knox, A., Markx, J., How, E., Azis, A., Hobaiter, C., van Veen, F. J. F. & Morrogh-Bernard, H., Jun 2019, In : International Journal of Primatology. 40, p. 393–416 24 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. A decision framework to identify populations that are most vulnerable to the population level effects of disturbance

    Wilson, L. J., Harwood, J., Booth, C. G., Joy, R. & Harris, C. M., 4 Feb 2020, In : Conservation Science and Practice. 2, 2, 7 p., e149.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 268708838

Top