Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

A review of the effects of seismic surveys on marine mammals

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review


Jonathan Charles David Gordon, D Gillespie, J Potter, A Frantzis, M P Simmonds, R Swift, D Thompson

School/Research organisations


This review highlights significant gaps in our knowledge of the effects of seismic air-gun noise on marine mammals. although the characteristics of the seismic signal at different ranges and depths and at higher frequencies are poorly understood, and there are often insufficient data to identify the appropriate acoustic propagation models to apply in particular conditions, these uncertainties are modest compared with those associated with biological factors. Potential biological effects of air gun noise include physical/physiological effects, behavioral disruption, and indirect effects associated with altered prey availability physical/physiological effects could include hearing threshold shifts and auditory damage as well as non-auditory disruption, and can be directly caused by sound exposure or the result of behavioral changes in response to sounds, e.g. recent observations suggesting that exposure to loud noise may result in decompression sickness. Direct information on the extent to which seismic pulses could damage hearing are difficult to obtain and as a consequence the impacts on hearing remain poorly known. Behavioral data have been collected for a few species in a limited range of conditions. responses, including startle and fright, avoidance, and changes in behaviour and vocalization patterns, have been observed in baleen whales, odontocetes, and pinnipeds and in some case these have occurred at ranges of tens or hundreds of kilometers. however, behavioral observations are typically variable, some findings are contradictory, and the biological significance of these effects has not been measured. Where feeding, orientation, hazard avoidance, migration or social behaviour are altered, it is possible that populations could be adversely affected. There may also be serious long-term consequences due to chronic exposure, and sound could affect marine mammals indirectly by changing the accessibility of their prey species.

A precautionary approach to management and regulation must be recommended. While such large degrees of uncertainty remain, this may results in restrictions to operational practices but these could be relaxed if key uncertainties are clarified by appropriate research.



Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)16-34
Number of pages19
JournalMarine Technology Society Journal
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. PAMGuard Software: PAMGuard Beta release 2.02.02

    Gillespie, D. M. & MacAulay, J. D. J., 22 Oct 2021

    Research output: Non-textual formSoftware

  2. Harbour porpoises exhibit localized evasion of a tidal turbine

    Gillespie, D. M., Palmer, L. E., MacAulay, J. D. J., Sparling, C. E. & Hastie, G. D., Sep 2021, In: Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 31, 9, p. 2459-2468 10 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Acoustic risk balancing by marine mammals: anthropogenic noise can influence the foraging decisions by seals

    Hastie, G. D., Lepper, P., McKnight, C., Milne, R., Russell, D. JF. & Thompson, D., 5 Jul 2021, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Journal of Applied Ecology. Early View, 10 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Marine Mammal Behavioral Response Studies in Southern California: Advances in Technology and Experimental Methods

    Southall, B. L., Moretti, D., Abraham, B., Calambokidis, J., De Ruiter, S. L. & Tyack, P. L., 2012, In: Marine Technology Society Journal. 46, 4, p. 48-59 12 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Insights into habitat utilization by green turtles (Chelonia mydas) during the inter-nesting period using animal-borne digital cameras

    Fuller, W. J., Broderick, A. C., Hooker, S. K., Witt, M. J. & Godley, B. J., 2009, In: Marine Technology Society Journal. 43, 3, p. 51-59 9 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Data sampling options for animal-borne video cameras: Considerations based on deployments with Antarctic fur seals

    Hooker, S. K., Heaslip, S. G., Matthiopoulos, J., Cox, O. & Boyd, I. L., 2008, In: Marine Technology Society Journal. 42, p. 65-75 11 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Controlled exposure experiments to determine the effects of noise on marine mammals

    Tyack, P., Gordon, J. & Thompson, D., Dec 2003, In: Marine Technology Society Journal. 37, 4, p. 41-53 13 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 28452497