Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

A strategy for efficiently collecting aerosol condensate using silica fibers: application to carbonyl emissions from e-cigarettes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Author(s)

W. Edryd Stephens, Bruna de Falco, Alberto Fiore

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Analyzing harmful constituents in e-cigarette aerosols typically involves adopting a methodology used for analyzing tobacco smoke. Cambridge filter pads (CFP) are the basis of numerous protocols for analyzing the various classes of compounds representing 93 harmful and potentially harmful constituents identified in tobacco smoke by the FDA. This paper describes a simplified method for trapping the low volatility components of e-cigarette aerosols using a single trapping procedure followed by physical extraction. The trap is a plug of amorphous silica fibers (0.75 g of 4 μm diameter) within a 10 mL syringe inserted between the e-cigarette mouthpiece and the pump of the vaping machine. The method is evaluated for emissions from three generations of e-cigarette device (Kangertech CE4, EVOD, and Subox Mini-C). On average, the silica wool traps about 94% of the vaporized liquid mass in the three devices and higher levels of condensate is retained before reaching saturation compared with CFP. The condensate is then physically extracted from the silica wool plug using a centrifuge. Condensate is then available for use directly in multiple analytical procedures or toxicological experiments. The method is tested by comparison with published analyses of carbonyls, among the most potent toxicants and carcinogens in e-cigarette emissions. Ranges for HPLC-DAD analyses of carbonyl-DNPH derivatives in a laboratory formulation of e-liquid are formaldehyde (0.182 ± 0.023 to 9.896 ± 0.709 μg puff–1), acetaldehyde (0.059 ± 0.005 to 0.791 ± 0.073 μg puff–1), and propionaldehyde (0.008 ± 0.0001 to 0.033 ± 0.023 μg puff–1); other carbonyls are identified and quantified. Carbonyl concentrations are also consistent with published experiments showing marked increases with variable power settings (10W to 50W). Compared with CFPs, e-cigarette aerosol collection by silica wool requires only one vaping session for multiple analyte groups, traps more condensate per puff, and collects more condensate before saturation.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2053-2062
JournalChemical Research in Toxicology
Volume32
Issue number10
Early online date26 Sep 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Oct 2019

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Reducing toxic reactive carbonyl species in e-cigarette emissions: testing a harm-reduction strategy based on dicarbonyl trapping

    de Falco, B., Petridis, A., Paramasivan, P., Troise, A. D., Scaloni, A., Deeni, Y., Stephens, W. E. & Fiore, A., 5 Jun 2020, In: RSC Advances. 10, 36, p. 21535-21544 10 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. A method for comparing the impact on carcinogenicity of tobacco products: a case study on heated tobacco versus cigarettes

    Slob, W., Soeteman-Hernández, L. G., Wieneke, B., Staal, Y. C. M., Stephens, W. E. & Talhout, R., 1 May 2020, In: Risk Analysis. Early View, 12 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Comparing the cancer potencies of emissions from vapourised nicotine products including e-cigarettes with those of tobacco smoke

    Stephens, W. E., 18 Dec 2017, In: Tobacco Control. 21, 1, p. 10-17 8 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. The molybdenum isotopic compositions of I-, S- and A- type granitic suites

    Yang, J., Barling, J., Siebert, C., Fietzke, J., Stephens, E. & Halliday, A. N., 15 May 2017, In: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 205, p. 168-186 19 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 261443694

Top