Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

AgentSeal: agent-based model describing movement of marine central-place foragers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Understanding why animals move as they do when searching for resources is a central question in ecology, and a prerequisite for the development of predictive process-based models for conservation and management. Many species are central-place foragers (CPF). While several models for CPFs have been proposed, they often assume well-defined return rules to the focal point (like breeding). For some CPFs, however, the decisions to return to central sites are governed by multiple interactions between environmental and physiological factors.

We present AgentSeal, a behaviour- and physiology-based, spatially explicit, agent-based model. We use harbour seals, a marine CPF, as a case study and focus on individuals outside their breeding and moulting seasons to capture general fine- and large-scale movements and drivers behind CPF. We model movement decisions based on optimal foraging strategy, cognitive and physiological processes in a realistic landscape, coupled with realistic prey distribution and tuned to a range of behavioural and physiological patterns observed at different scales and levels of organisation (pattern-orientated modelling, POM).

The model can reproduce energetic, movement and other behavioural patterns such as net energy balance, at-sea and on land site fidelity, daily activity budgets and trip extents. The model reveals the crucial elements needed to model return-trips of CPFs including movement characteristics that vary as a function of local environmental conditions, cognitive mapping of foraging areas as points of attraction in subsequent foraging trips, and physiological requirements defining switches between resting and foraging.

We discuss potential applications and extensions of the model, including investigations of fundamental questions in foraging ecology: how spatial distribution and aggregation of resources affect movement of marine CPFs; what are the main drivers behind their at-sea site-fidelity to foraging patches? We also discuss applied objectives such as improving our understanding of population-level consequences of anthropogenic disturbances and ultimately evolving AgentSeal into a practical management tool.

Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number109397
JournalEcological Modelling
Volume440
Early online date22 Dec 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jan 2021

    Research areas

  • Optimal foraging, Marine central-place foragers, Process-based modelling, Harbour seals

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Evaluating strategies for managing anthropogenic mortality on marine mammals: an R implementation with the package RLA

    Genu, M., Gilles, A., Hammond, P. S., Macleod, K., Paillé, J., Paradinas, I., Smout, S., Winship, A. J. & Authier, M., 24 Dec 2021, In: Frontiers in Marine Science. 8, 18 p., 795953.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Movement patterns of a Critically Endangered elasmobranch (Dipturus intermedius) in a Marine Protected Area

    Lavender, E., Aleynik, D., Dodd, J., Illian, J., James, M., Wright, P. J., Smout, S. & Thorburn, J., 5 Dec 2021, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. Early View, 18 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Integrating disparate datasets to model the functional response of a marine predator: a case study of harbour porpoises in the southern North Sea

    Ransijn, J., Hammond, P., Leopold, M., Sveegaard, S. & Smout, S., Dec 2021, In: Ecology and Evolution. 11, 23, p. 17458-17470 13 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Compound specific isotope analyses of harp seal teeth: tools for trophic ecology reconstruction

    Kershaw, J. L., de la Vega, C., Jeffreys, R., Frie, A. K., Haug, T., Mahaffey, C., Mettam, C., Stenson, G. & Smout, S. C., 11 Nov 2021, In: Marine Ecology Progress Series. 678, p. 211-225

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  5. Environmental cycles and individual variation in the vertical movements of a benthic elasmobranch

    Lavender, E., Alenynik, D., Dodd, J., Illian, J., James, M., Wright, P. J., Smout, S. & Thorburn, J. A., Nov 2021, In: Marine Biology. 168, 11, 18 p., 164.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Ecological Modelling (Journal)

    Monique Lea MacKenzie (Editor)

    2002 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

Related by journal

  1. A fine-scale marine mammal movement model for assessing long-term aggregate noise exposure

    Joy, R., Schick, R. S., Dowd, M., Margolina, T., Joseph, J. E. & Thomas, L., Feb 2022, In: Ecological Modelling. 464, 12 p., 109798.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Combining the strengths of agent-based modelling and network statistics to understand animal movement and interactions with resources: example from within-patch foraging decisions of bumblebees

    Chudzinska, M., Dupont, Y. L., Nabe-Nielsen, J., Maia, K. P., Henriksen, M. V., Rasmussen, C., Kissling, W. D., Hagen, M. & Trøjelsgaard, K., 15 Aug 2020, In: Ecological Modelling. 430, 109119.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Estimating species distributions from spatially biased citizen science data

    Johnston, A., Moran, N., Musgrove, A., Fink, D. & Baillie, S. R., 15 Apr 2020, In: Ecological Modelling. 422, 10 p., 108927.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Integrated modelling of Atlantic mackerel distribution patterns and movements: a template for dynamic impact assessments

    Heinänen, S., Chudzinska, M. E., Brandi Mortensen, J., Teo, T. Z. E., Rong Utne, K., Doksæter Sivle, L. & Thomsen, F., 10 Nov 2018, In: Ecological Modelling. 387, p. 118-133 16 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 271870326

Top