Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

All or nothing, but if not all, next best or nothing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DOI

Open Access Status

  • Embargoed (until 1/05/20)

Abstract

Suppose two children face a deadly threat. You can either do nothing, save one child by sacrificing your arms, or save both by sacrificing your arms. Here are two plausible claims: first, it is permissible to do nothing; second, it is wrong to save only one. Joe Horton argues that the combination of these two claims has the implausible implication that if you are not going to save both children, you ought to save neither. This is one instance of what he calls the ALL OR NOTHING PROBLEM. I here present CONDITIONAL PERMISSIONS as the solution. Although saving only one child is wrong, it can be conditionally permissible, that is, permissible given what you are not going to do. You ought to save both children or save neither, but if you are not going to save both, you ought to do the next best thing (save one) or save neither.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)278-291
JournalJournal of Philosophy
Volume116
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2019

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Rescue and personal involvement: a response to Woollard

    Pummer, T. G. & Crisp, R., 16 Sep 2019, In : Analysis. Advance articles, anz052.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. The ethics of giving: philosophers’ perspectives on philanthropy

    Pummer, T. G., 19 Jul 2019, In : Philosophical Quarterly. In press, pqz032.

    Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article review

  3. Each-we dilemmas and effective altruism

    Clark, M. & Pummer, T. G., 2 Jul 2019, In : Journal of Practical Ethics. 7, 1, p. 24-32

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Charity and partiality

    Pummer, T. G., 11 Jun 2019, Ethics and the Contemporary World. Edmonds, D. (ed.). Routledge

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

  5. The worseness of nonexistence

    Pummer, T. G., 21 Mar 2019, Saving people from the harm of death. Gamlund, E. & Solberg, C. T. (eds.). New York: Oxford University Press, p. 215-228 (Population-level bioethics).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Related by journal

  1. Groups: toward a theory of plural embodiment

    Uzquiano, G., 2018, In : Journal of Philosophy. 115, 8, p. 423-452

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. From truth pluralism to ontological pluralism and back

    Cotnoir, A. & Edwards, D. O., Mar 2015, In : Journal of Philosophy. 112, 3, p. 113-140 113.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Time travelers are not free

    Rea, M. C., 1 May 2015, In : Journal of Philosophy. 112, 5

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Deontology and Descartes' Demon

    Weatherson, B. J., Sep 2008, In : Journal of Philosophy. 105, 9, p. 540-569 30 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 257610308

Top