Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

An observational study of clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds comparing the procedural use of optical coherence tomography against angiography alone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Author(s)

Stephen Hamshere, Alex Byrne, Oliver Guttmann, Paul Rees, Christos Weerakody, Andrew Wragg, Charles Knight, Anthony Mathur, Daniel A. Jones

School/Research organisations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The introduction of the bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) has led to new avenues of coronary intervention; however, there have been concerns raised regarding the mechanical properties of BVS and the resulting in-stent thrombosis. We aim to assess whether intracoronary imaging improves outcome in patients following BVS implantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention using BVS at a single centre between June 2013 and June 2016 were included in this study (n=79). Percutaneous coronary intervention with BVS was performed according to conventional practice: predilatation, postdilatation and intracoronary assessment with optical coherence tomography (OCT) according to operator's preferences. The primary endpoint was Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE), defined as all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction and revascularization, at 120 days.

RESULTS: Forty-three (54.4%) patients underwent OCT assessment and 36 (45.6%) patients underwent angiography alone post-BVS insertion. There were no significant differences at baseline between both groups; a total of 13 (30.2%) patients who had intracoronary OCT imaging performed underwent further postdilatation after malapposed struts were identified. Although no deaths were observed, there was a significant difference seen in MACE over the follow-up period between OCT and angiography cohorts (4.7 vs. 19.4% respectively; P=0.042). There was a greater number of MACE in low-experienced operators.

CONCLUSION: As visual assessment with angiography has poor specificity for identifying strut malapposition, intracoronary OCT should be undertaken in all patients postinsertion of BVS stents in inexperienced operators to appropriately assess for stent malapposition, and reduce the subsequent risk of MACE.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)482-488
JournalCoronary Artery Disease
Volume29
Issue number6
Early online date10 Apr 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2018

    Research areas

  • Bioabsorbable coronary stents, Coronary artery disease, Optical coherence tomography, Percutaneous coronary intervention

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. The REBOA window: a cadaveric study delineating the optimum site for austere cannulation of the femoral artery for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta

    Slim, N., West, C. T., Rees, P., Brassett, C. & Gaunt, M., 2 Mar 2020, In: BMJ Military Health.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. 43 The role of mechanically-supported emergency percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock

    Frain, K. & Rees, P., 2020, In: Heart. 106, Suppl 2, p. A36-A36

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Military application of mechanical CPR devices: a pressing requirement?

    Parsons, I. T., Cox, A. T. & Rees, P., Nov 2018, In: Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps. 164, 6, p. 438-441

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 252882407

Top