Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Andean grasslands are as productive as tropical cloud forests

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Author(s)

I. Oliveras, C. Girardin, C. E. Doughty, N. Cahuana, C. E. Arenas, V. Oliver, W. Huaraca Huasco, Y. Malhi

Abstract

We aim to assess net primary productivity (NPP) and carbon cycling in Andean tropical alpine grasslands (puna) and compare it with NPP of tropical montane cloud forests. We ask the following questions: (1) how do NPP and soil respiration of grasslands vary over the seasonal cycle? (2) how do burning and grazing affect puna productivity? (3) if the montane forest expands into the puna, what will be the resulting change in productivity? The study sites are located at the South-eastern Peruvian Andes; one grassland site and the forest sites are in Wayqecha biological station, and another grassland site in Manu National Park. At each grassland site, we selected a burnt and an unburnt area, installed unfenced and fenced transects in each area, and monitored above-ground productivity (NPPAG), below-ground productivity (NPPBG) and soil respiration (Rs) for 2 yr. In the forest, we monitored NPPAG, NPPBG and Rs for 2–4 yr. Grassland NPP varied between 4.6 ± 0.25 (disturbed areas) to 15.3 ± 0.9 Mg C ha−1 yr−1 (undisturbed areas) and cloud forest NPP was between 7.05 ± 0.39 and 8.0 ± 0.47 Mg C ha−1 yr−1, while soil carbon stocks were in the range of 126 ± 22 to 285 ± 31 Mg C ha−1. There were no significant differences on NPP between the puna and forest sites. The most undisturbed site had significantly higher NPP than other grassland sites, but no differences were found when relating grazing and fire at other sites. There were lower residence times of above-ground biomass compared to below-ground biomass. There was a strong seasonal signal on grassland NPPAG and NPPBG, with a shift on allocation at the beginning of the austral summer. High elevation tropical grasslands can be as productive as adjacent cloud forests, but have very different carbon cycling and retention properties than cloud forests.

Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number115011
Number of pages10
JournalEnvironmental Research Letters
Volume9
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2014

    Research areas

  • Tropical alpine wetlands, Above-ground productivity, Below-ground productivity, Fire, Grazing, Disturbances, Puna, Net primary productivity, Climate-change, Peruvian Andes, Carbon storage, Elevational transect, Human impact, Biomass, Vegetation, Dynamics

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by journal

  1. A meta-analysis of the relationship between companies’ greenhouse gas emissions and financial performance

    Galama, J. T. & Scholtens, B., 25 Mar 2021, In: Environmental Research Letters. 16, 4, 24 p., 043006.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Carbon cycle dynamics during episodes of rapid climate change

    Meissner, K. J., Brook, E., Finkelstein, S. A. & Rae, J., 23 Mar 2021, In: Environmental Research Letters. 16, 4, 8 p., 040201.

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

  3. The distribution and amount of carbon in the largest peatland complex in Amazonia

    Draper, F., Roucoux, K. H., Lawson, I. T., Mitchard, E., Honorio Coronado, E., Lahteenoja, O., Torres Montenegro, L., Valderrama Sandoval, E., Zarate, R. & Baker, T., 15 Dec 2014, In: Environmental Research Letters. 9, 12, 124017.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 161939719

Top