Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Are great apes able to reason from multi-item samples to populations of food items?

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

DOI

Author(s)

Johanna Eckert, Hannes Rakoczy, Josep Call

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Inductive learning from limited observations is a cognitive capacity of fundamental importance. In humans, it is underwritten by our intuitive statistics, the ability to draw systematic inferences from populations to randomly drawn samples and vice versa. According to recent research in cognitive development, human intuitive statistics develops early in infancy. Recent work in comparative psychology has produced first evidence for analogous cognitive capacities in great apes who flexibly drew inferences from populations to samples. In the present study, we investigated whether great apes (Pongo abelii, Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla) also draw inductive inferences in the opposite direction, from samples to populations. In two experiments, apes saw an experimenter randomly drawing one multi-item sample from each of two populations of food items. The populations differed in their proportion of preferred to neutral items (24:6 vs. 6:24) but apes saw only the distribution of food items in the samples that reflected the distribution of the respective populations (e.g., 4:1 vs. 1:4). Based on this observation they were then allowed to choose between the two populations. Results show that apes seemed to make inferences from samples to populations and thus chose the population from which the more favorable (4:1) sample was drawn in Experiment 1. In this experiment, the more attractive sample not only contained proportionally but also absolutely more preferred food items than the less attractive sample. Experiment 2, however, revealed that when absolute and relative frequencies were disentangled, apes performed at chance level. Whether these limitations in apes’ performance reflect true limits of cognitive competence or merely performance limitations due to accessory task demands is still an open question.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere22693
JournalAmerican Journal of Primatology
Volume79
Issue number10
Early online date6 Sep 2017
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2017

    Research areas

  • Intuitive statistics, Probabilistic reasoning, Comparative cognition, Non-human primates, Numerical cognition

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. The social-cognitive basis of infants’ reference to absent entities

    Bohn, M., Zimmermann, L., Call, J. & Tomasello, M. 6 Apr 2018 In : Cognition. 177, p. 41-48 8 p.

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

  2. Chimpanzees consider humans' psychological states when drawing statistical inferences

    Eckert, J., Rakoczy, H., Call, J., Herrmann, E. & Hanus, D. 18 Jun 2018 In : Current Biology. 28, 5 p.

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

  3. Intuitive optics: what great apes infer from mirrors and shadows

    Völter, C. J. & Call, J. 2 May 2018 In : Animal Cognition. First Online, 20 p.

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

  4. Primate social attention: species differences and effects of individual experience in humans, great apes, and macaques

    Kano, F., Shepherd, S. V., Hirata, S. & Call, J. 23 Feb 2018 In : PLoS One. 13, 2, 25 p., e0193283

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

  5. Thirty years of great ape gestures

    Tomasello, M. & Call, J. 21 Feb 2018 In : Animal Cognition. First Online, 9 p.

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Related by journal

  1. Resilience of experimentally-seeded dietary traditions in wild vervets: evidence from group fissions

    van de Waal, E., van Schaik, C. P. & Whiten, A. Oct 2017 In : American Journal of Primatology. 79, 10, e22687

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

  2. Distinctiveness enhances long-term event memory in non-human primates, irrespective of reinforcement

    Lewis, A., Call, J. & Berntsen, D. Aug 2017 In : American Journal of Primatology. 79, 8, e22665

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

  3. Socially transmitted diffusion of a novel behavior from subordinate chimpanzees

    Watson, S. K., Reamer, L. A., Mareno, M. C., Vale, G., Harrison, R. A., Lambeth, S. P., Schapiro, S. J. & Whiten, A. Jun 2017 In : American Journal of Primatology. 79, 6, e22642

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

  4. Automated face detection for occurrence and occupancy estimation in chimpanzees

    Crunchant, A-S., Egerer, M., Loos, A., Burghardt, T., Zuberbühler, K., Corogenes, K., Leinert, V., Kulik, L. & Kühl, H. S. Mar 2017 In : American Journal of Primatology. 79, 3, p. 1-12 12 p., e22627

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Related by journal

  1. American Journal of Primatology (Journal)

    Kate Arnold (Reviewer)
    15 Jul 2013 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial workPeer review of manuscripts

ID: 250846971