Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Are we defending the indefensible? Reflecting on policy and practice around ‘the border’ in plant biosecurity for tree health

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DOI

Open Access permissions

Open

Abstract

The challenges to forest health from climate change, globalization, contemporary trade practices and new recreational patterns require effective biosecurity. We asked: How is the biosecurity border for tree health understood and enacted by state and non-state actors? What are the consequences for tree health? Semi-structured interviews (N = 10) were conducted with scientists and other relevant actors (N = 21). The border was understood variously as: a biophysical boundary, often the coast; a geopolitical boundary, usually of the European Union; the points of main inspection focus; dispersed nodes of inspection; a ‘pre-border’ outside of UK; or by the location of detection activities. A wide range of state, non-state and hybrid groups are engaged in border practices. These practices have been altered due to trade and climate changes, are subject to cost and resource priorities and reflect particular knowledge flows and the biological nature of the agents. We suggest that there is an ‘everyone’ as well as ‘everywhere’ border that demands clarification of risks, roles and responsibilities, and we offer practical recommendations. We conclude that tree health border challenges are a manifestation of wider sustainability issues that enable us to explore human–nature relationships, democratic engagement and the pursuit of more sustainable futures.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number716
Number of pages20
JournalForests
Volume10
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Aug 2019

    Research areas

  • Forest management, Tree health, Social science, Biosecurity, Borders, Pest, Pathogen, Governance

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Are we defending the indefensible? Reflecting on policy and practice around 'the border' in plant biosecurity

    White, R., Marzano, M., Leahy, S. & Jones, G., 2016.

    Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstract

  2. Factors affecting feelings of justice in biodiversity conflicts: towards fairer jaguar management in Calakmul, Mexico

    Lecuyer, L., Calmé, S., Blanchet, F. G., Schmook, B. & White, R. M., Sep 2019, In : Biological Conservation. 237, p. 133-144

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. More than a hostile environment: exploring the impact of the Right to Rent part of the Immigration Act 2016

    Crawford, J., McKee, K. & Leahy, S., 23 Aug 2019, In : Sociological Research Online. Online First, 18 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. A competency framework to assess and activate education for sustainable development: addressing the UN Sustainable Development Goals 4.7 Challenge

    Giangrande, N., White, R. M., East, M., Jackson, R., Clarke, T., Saloff Coste, M. & Penha-Lopes, G., 17 May 2019, In : Sustainability. 11, 10, 16 p., 2832.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 260534989