Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Assessment of soil CO2 efflux and its components using a process-based model in a young temperate forest site

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


Gustavo Saiz, Kevin Black, Brian Reidy, Sandra Lopez, Edward P. Farrell

School/Research organisations


It is crucial to advance the understanding of soil CO2 efflux and its components for a better comprehension of carbon dynamics in terrestrial ecosystems. The process-based PATCIS model was applied to a first rotation young Sitka spruce stand in order to simulate the seasonal contribution of soil respiration components to the overall soil CO2 efflux. We evaluated the performance of the model with observed measurements and compared it with empirically derived regressions. Once the model was parameterised, it explained 75% of the seasonal variation in total Soil CO2 efflux. Similar seasonal trends and annual estimates of soil CO2 efflux were obtained with either empirical or the process-based PATCIS models. Heterotrophic and autotrophic respiration contributed almost equally to total CO2 efflux during the early and late part of the year, while a larger contribution of autotrophic respiration to total CO2 efflux Occurred during the growing season. The overall annual contribution of autotrophic respiration to total Soil CO2 efflux was 54.7%. Most of root respiration took place in both the litter humus layer and the A, horizon as a result of their large concentrations of fine roots. We observed an accumulation of organic matter in the litter-humus layer, and a net loss from the mineral soil, which had much larger organic matter content compared to the litter-humus layer. The organic matter turnover rate calculated for the mineral soil was 45 years (mean residence time). The sensitivity analysis showed soil temperature as the most important factor controlling soil respiration. The influence of soil moisture was more variable and had an overall negative effect on soil respiratory rates, except for periods of low soil water content, such as summer drought. The episodic occurrence of very wet conditions at the deeper soil layers was responsible for their low contribution to total soil respiration. In general, gas transport within the soil was not an important constraint for soil CO2 efflux since most of soil respiration was produced in the highly porous litter-humus and top mineral layers. The autotrophic component was more affected than heterotrophic respiration by changes in soil water content. Other factors such as changes in litterfall inputs were shown to have a more limited impact on Soil CO2 efflux. This work shows that the use of a process-based model to simulate soil CO2 efflux may be a useful tool to separate soil respiration components. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.



Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-89
Number of pages11
Publication statusPublished - 15 Apr 2007

    Research areas

  • afforestation, autotrophic respiration, Gley soil, heterotrophic respiration, PATCIS model, Sitka spruce, soil respiration, MIXED HARDWOOD FOREST, ROOT RESPIRATION, CARBON-DIOXIDE, LITTER DECOMPOSITION, ORGANIC-CARBON, SPRUCE FOREST, WATER CONTENT, PINE FORESTS, FLUX, TRANSPORT

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by journal

  1. Coring and compaction: best practice in blue carbon stock and burial estimations

    Smeaton, C., Barlow, N. & Austin, W., 1 Apr 2020, In : Geoderma. 364, C, 114180.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Low-temperature SEM imaging of polymer structure in artificial sediments and the implications regarding sediment stability.

    Perkins, R., Davidson, I. R. & Paterson, D. M., Sep 2006, In : Geoderma. 134, p. 48-55 8 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Variations in weathering processes and rates with time in a chronosequence of soils from Glen Feshie, Scotland

    Bain, D. C., Mellor, A., Robertson-Rintoul, M. S. E. & Buckland, S. T., 1 Jan 1993, In : Geoderma. 57, 3, p. 275-293 19 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 654417