Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Can automated imaging for optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer analysis aid glaucoma detection?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Author(s)

Katie Banister, Charles Boachie, Rupert Bourne, Jonathan Cook, Jennifer M. Burr, Craig Ramsay, David Garway-Heath, Joanne Gray, Peter McMeekin, Rodolfo Hernández, Augusto Azuara-Blanco

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of automated imaging for glaucoma.
Design: Prospective, direct comparison study.
Participants: Adults with suspected glaucoma or ocular hypertension referred to hospital eye services in the United Kingdom.
Methods: We evaluated 4 automated imaging test algorithms: the Heidelberg Retinal Tomography (HRT; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) glaucoma probability score (GPS), the HRT Moorfields regression analysis (MRA), scanning laser polarimetry (GDx enhanced corneal compensation; Glaucoma Diagnostics (GDx), Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) nerve fiber indicator (NFI), and Spectralis optical coherence tomography (OCT; Heidelberg Engineering) retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) classification. We defined abnormal tests as an automated classification of outside normal limits for HRT and OCT or NFI ≥ 56 (GDx). We conducted a sensitivity analysis, using borderline abnormal image classifications. The reference standard was clinical diagnosis by a masked glaucoma expert including standardized clinical assessment and automated perimetry. We analyzed 1 eye per patient (the one with more advanced disease). We also evaluated the performance according to severity and using a combination of 2 technologies.
Main Outcome Measures: Sensitivity and specificity, likelihood ratios, diagnostic, odds ratio, and proportion of indeterminate tests.
Results: We recruited 955 participants, and 943 were included in the analysis. The average age was 60.5 years (standard deviation, 13.8 years); 51.1% were women. Glaucoma was diagnosed in at least 1 eye in 16.8%; 32% of participants had no glaucoma-related findings. The HRT MRA had the highest sensitivity (87.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 80.2%–92.1%), but lowest specificity (63.9%; 95% CI, 60.2%–67.4%); GDx had the lowest sensitivity (35.1%; 95% CI, 27.0%–43.8%), but the highest specificity (97.2%; 95% CI, 95.6%–98.3%). The HRT GPS sensitivity was 81.5% (95% CI, 73.9%–87.6%), and specificity was 67.7% (95% CI, 64.2%–71.2%); OCT sensitivity was 76.9% (95% CI, 69.2%–83.4%), and specificity was 78.5% (95% CI, 75.4%–81.4%). Including only eyes with severe glaucoma, sensitivity increased: HRT MRA, HRT GPS, and OCT would miss 5% of eyes, and GDx would miss 21% of eyes. A combination of 2 different tests did not improve the accuracy substantially.
Conclusions: Automated imaging technologies can aid clinicians in diagnosing glaucoma, but may not replace current strategies because they can miss some cases of severe glaucoma.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)930-938
Number of pages9
JournalOphthalmology
Volume123
Issue number5
Early online date23 Mar 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2016

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. EFFECT OF CORNEAL CROSS-LINKING vs STANDARD CARE ON KERATOCONUS PROGRESSION IN YOUNG PATIENTS: THE KERALINK RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

    Keralink Trial Study Group, 20 Apr 2021, In: Ophthalmology.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Trends in diabetic retinopathy screening attendance and associations with vision impairment attributable to diabetes in a large nationwide cohort

    Lawrenson, J. G., Bourmpaki, E., Bunce, C., Stratton, I. M., Gardner, P., Anderson, J. & EROS Study Group, Apr 2021, In: Diabetic Medicine. 38, 4, 11 p., e14425.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared with phacoemulsification: the FACT non-inferiority RCT

    Day, A. C., Burr, J. M., Bennett, K., Hunter, R., Bunce, C., Doré, C. J., Nanavaty, M. A., Balaggan, K. S. & Wilkins, M. R., 1 Jan 2021, In: Health Technology Assessment. 25, 6, p. 1-68 68 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus phacoemulsification cataract surgery (FACT): a randomized noninferiority trial

    Day, A. C., Burr, J. M., Bennett, K., Bunce, C., Doré, C. J., Rubin, G. S., Nanavaty, M. A., Balaggan, K. S., Wilkins, M. R. & FACT trial group, Aug 2020, In: Ophthalmology. 127, 8, p. 1012-1019 8 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. EFFECT OF CORNEAL CROSS-LINKING vs STANDARD CARE ON KERATOCONUS PROGRESSION IN YOUNG PATIENTS: THE KERALINK RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

    Keralink Trial Study Group, 20 Apr 2021, In: Ophthalmology.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus phacoemulsification cataract surgery (FACT): a randomized noninferiority trial

    Day, A. C., Burr, J. M., Bennett, K., Bunce, C., Doré, C. J., Rubin, G. S., Nanavaty, M. A., Balaggan, K. S., Wilkins, M. R. & FACT trial group, Aug 2020, In: Ophthalmology. 127, 8, p. 1012-1019 8 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Optical coherence tomography for the monitoring of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review

    Castillo, M. M., Mowatt, G., Elders, A., Lois, N., Fraser, C., Hernández, R., Amoaku, W., Burr, J. M., Lotery, A., Ramsay, C. R. & Azuara-Blanco, A., Feb 2015, In: Ophthalmology. 122, 2, p. 399-406 8 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Re Coster et al.: A comparison of lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty outcomes: a registry study (Ophthalmology 2014;121:979-87)

    Somner, J. E. A., Hardman-Lea, S., Bourne, R., Burr, J. & Shah, P., Jan 2015, In: Ophthalmology. 122, 1, p. e9-e10

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

ID: 241578147

Top