Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Can females choose to avoid mating failure in the seed bug Lygaeus simulans?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

It is becoming increasingly clear that copulation does not necessarily always lead to offspring production in many organisms, despite fertilization success presumably being under both strong natural and sexual selection. In the seed bug Lygaeus simulans, between 40% and 60% of copulations fail to produce offspring, with this ‘mating failure’ representing a significantly repeatable male-associated trait. Mating has been demonstrated to be costly in this species and, as such, we might expect females to minimize the chance of mating failure by displaying a preference for males with higher insemination success where possible. After assaying males for mating failure, we asked whether females preferred males with a history of successful inseminations versus unsuccessful inseminations in pairwise mate choice trials. Contrary to our expectations, females showed no preference for more successful over less successful males. Moreover, females showed no preference for larger males in the choice trials, even though larger males were significantly more likely to successfully inseminate females in the initial assay. This apparent lack of female precopulatory choice suggests that postcopulatory choice mechanisms may be key to mating failure in this species. However, this does not necessarily explain why females pay the cost of mating with males they will then reject via postcopulatory processes. More generally, our results suggest that mating failure may play a largely underappreciated role in mating systems evolution, influencing both the cost of choosiness, and the costs and benefits of polyandry.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-69
Number of pages9
JournalAnimal Behaviour
Volume129
Early online date6 Jun 2017
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2017

    Research areas

  • Mating failure, Cryptic female choice, Sexual selection, Polyandry, Insect reproduction

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Divergence is not speciation, or why we need females: a comment on Tinghitella et al

    Burdfield-Steel, E. R. & Shuker, D. M. 9 May 2018 In : Behavioral Ecology. Advance articles, 2 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Differential gene expression is not required for facultative sex allocation: a transcriptome analysis of brain tissue in the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis

    Cook, N., Boulton, R., Green, J., Trivedi, U., Tauber, E., Pannebakker, B. A., Ritchie, M. G. & Shuker, D. M. Feb 2018 In : Royal Society Open Science. 5, 8 p., 171718

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Sperm blocking is not a male adaptation to sperm competition in a parasitoid wasp

    Boulton, R. A., Cook, N., Green, J., Greenway, E. V. & Shuker, D. M. 13 Jan 2018 In : Behavioral Ecology. 29, 1, p. 253-263

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Reproductive interference in insects

    Shuker, D. M. & Burdfield-Steel, E. R. Aug 2017 In : Ecological Entomology. 42, S1, p. 65-75

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Exposure to the neonicotinoid imidacloprid disrupts sex allocation cue use during superparasitism in the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis

    Cook, N., Green, J., Shuker, D. M. & Whitehorn, P. R. 7 Nov 2016 In : Ecological Entomology. 41, 6, p. 693-697 5 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Development of object manipulation in wild chimpanzees

    Lamon, N., Neumann, C. & Zuberbuhler, K. Jan 2018 In : Animal Behaviour. 135, p. 121-130

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Field experiments with wild primates reveal no consistent dominance-based bias in social learning

    Botting, J., Whiten, A., Grampp, M. & van de Waal, E. Feb 2018 In : Animal Behaviour. 136, p. 1-12 12 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Flexible use of simple and combined calls in female Campbell's monkeys

    Coye, C., Ouattara, K., Arlet, M. E., Lemmasson, A. & Zuberbuhler, K. Jul 2018 In : Animal Behaviour. 141, p. 171-181 11 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Heterospecific shoaling in an invasive poeciliid: shared history does not affect shoal cohesion

    Ali, J. R., Deacon, A. E., Mahabir, K., Ramnarine, I. W. & Magurran, A. E. Apr 2018 In : Animal Behaviour. 138, p. 1-8 8 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. How pre- and postcopulatory sexual selection influence male mating decisions in a promiscuous species

    Orfao, I., Ojanguren, A. F., Barbosa, M., Vicente, L., Varela, S. & Magurran, A. E. Feb 2018 In : Animal Behaviour. 136, p. 147-157 11 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Animal Behaviour (Journal)

    Webster, M. M. (Editor)
    1 Jan 201731 Dec 2019

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial workEditor of research journal

  2. Animal Behaviour (Journal)

    Healy, S. D. (Editor)
    1 Jun 201631 May 2020

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial workEditor of research journal

  3. Animal Behaviour (Journal)

    Alfredo Fernandez Ojanguren (Member of editorial board)
    15 May 201312 Feb 2015

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial workPeer review of manuscripts

  4. Animal Behaviour (Journal)

    Thomas Bugnyar (Editor)
    20082011

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial workEditor of research journal

  5. Animal Behaviour (Journal)

    Rachel Louise Kendal (Editor)
    2007 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial workEditor of research journal

ID: 249730731