Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Children and parents’ perspectives on the acceptability of three management strategies for dental caries in primary teeth within the ‘Filling Children’s Teeth: Indicated or Not’ (FiCTION) randomised controlled trial – a qualitative study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Sarab El-Yousfi, Nicola P. T. Innes, Richard D. Holmes, Ruth Freeman, Kathryn B. Cunningham, Elaine McColl, Anne Maguire, Gail V. A. Douglas, Janet E. Clarkson, Zoe Marshman

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Background

The Filling Children’s Teeth: Indicated Or Not? (FiCTION) randomised controlled trial (RCT) aimed to explore the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of managing dental caries in children’s primary teeth. The trial compared three management strategies: conventional caries management with best practice prevention (C + P), biological management with best practice prevention (B + P) and best practice prevention alone (PA)-based approaches. Recently, the concept of treatment acceptability has gained attention and attempts have been made to provide a conceptual definition, however this has mainly focused on adults. Recognising the importance of evaluating the acceptability of interventions in addition to their effectiveness, particularly for multi-component complex interventions, the trial design included a qualitative component. The aim of this component was to explore the acceptability of the three strategies from the perspectives of the child participants and their parents.

Methods

Qualitative exploration, based on the concept of acceptability. Participants were children already taking part in the FiCTION trial and their parents. Children were identified through purposive maximum variation sampling. The sample included children from the three management strategy arms who had been treated and followed up; median (IQR) follow-up was at 33.8 (23.8, 36.7) months. Semi-structured interviews with thirteen child-parent dyads. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using a framework approach.

Results

Data saturation was reached after thirteen interviews. Each child-parent dyad took part in one interview together. The participants were eight girls and five boys aged 5–11 years and their parents. The children’s distribution across the trial arms was: C + P n = 4; B + P n = 5; PA n = 4. Three key factors influenced the acceptability of caries management in primary teeth to children and parents: i) experiences of specific procedures within management strategies; ii) experiences of anticipatory dental anxiety and; iii) perceptions of effectiveness (particularly whether pain was reduced). These factors were underpinned by a fourth key factor: the notion of trust in the dental professionals – this was pervasive across all arms.

Conclusions

Overall children and parents found each of the three strategies for the management of dental caries in primary teeth acceptable, with trust in the dental professional playing an important role.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number69
Number of pages12
JournalBMC Oral Health
Volume20
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Mar 2020

    Research areas

  • Caries, Caries management, Qualitative, Children, Parents, Paediatric dentistry, Primary teeth, Primary dental care, Acceptability

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Dental professionals’ experiences of managing children with carious lesions in their primary teeth – a qualitative study within the FiCTION randomised controlled trial

    Marshman, Z., Kettle, J. E., Holmes, R. D., Cunningham, K. B., Freeman, R., Gibson, B. J., McColl, E., Maguire, A., Douglas, G. V. A., Clarkson, J. E. & Innes, N. P. T., 4 Mar 2020, In : BMC Oral Health. 20, 16 p., 64.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Modifying alcohol consumption to reduce obesity: a randomized controlled feasibility study of a complex community-based intervention for men

    Irvine, L., Crombie, I. K., Cunningham, K. B., Williams, B., Sniehotta, F. F., Norrie, J., Melson, A. J., Jones, C., Rice, P., Slane, P. W., Achison, M., Mckenzie, A., Dimova, E. D. & Allan, S., 1 Nov 2017, In : Alcohol and Alcoholism. 52, 6, p. 677-684 8 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Dental professionals’ experiences of managing children with carious lesions in their primary teeth – a qualitative study within the FiCTION randomised controlled trial

    Marshman, Z., Kettle, J. E., Holmes, R. D., Cunningham, K. B., Freeman, R., Gibson, B. J., McColl, E., Maguire, A., Douglas, G. V. A., Clarkson, J. E. & Innes, N. P. T., 4 Mar 2020, In : BMC Oral Health. 20, 16 p., 64.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. INTERVAL (investigation of NICE technologies for enabling risk-variable-adjusted-length) dental recalls trial: a multicentre randomised controlled trial investigating the best dental recall interval for optimum, cost-effective maintenance of oral health in dentate adults attending dental primary care

    Clarkson, J. E., Pitts, N. B., Bonetti, D., Boyers, D., Braid, H., Elford, R., Fee, P. A., Floate, R., Goulão, B., Humphris, G., Needleman, I., Norrie, J. D. T., Ord, F., van der Pol, M., Ramsay, C. R., Ricketts, D. N. J., Worthington, H. V., Young, L., Anderson, T., Burke, T. & 11 others, Dolan, P., Douglas, G., Freeman, R., Gorter, R., Herbert, R., Hodge, P., Mettes, D., McCombes, W., Ross, M., White, D. & INTERVAL Trial Collaboration, 7 Aug 2018, In : BMC Oral Health. 18, 10 p., 135.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. The relationship of dental caries and dental fear in Malaysian adolescents: a latent variable approach

    Esa, R., Leng Ong, A., Humphris, G. M. & Freeman, R., 12 Mar 2014, In : BMC Oral Health. 14, 7 p., 19.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 266885639

Top