Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Cluster capture-recapture to account for identification uncertainty on aerial surveys of animal populations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

DOI

Open Access permissions

Open

Abstract

Capture‐recapture methods for estimating wildlife population sizes almost always require their users to identify every detected animal. Many modern‐day wildlife surveys detect animals without physical capture—visual detection by cameras is one such example. However, for every pair of detections, the surveyor faces a decision that is often fraught with uncertainty: are they linked to the same individual? An inability to resolve every such decision to a high degree of certainty prevents the use of standard capture‐recapture methods, impeding the estimation of animal density. Here, we develop an estimator for aerial surveys, on which two planes or unmanned vehicles (drones) fly a transect over the survey region, detecting individuals via high‐definition cameras. Identities remain unknown, so one cannot discern if two detections match to the same animal; however, detections in close proximity are more likely to match. By modeling detection locations as a clustered point process, we extend recently developed methodology and propose a precise and computationally efficient estimator of animal density that does not require individual identification. We illustrate the method with an aerial survey of porpoise, on which cameras detect individuals at the surface of the sea, and we need to take account of the fact that they are not always at the surface.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)326-336
Number of pages11
JournalBiometrics
Volume75
Issue number1
Early online date2 Apr 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

    Research areas

  • Capture-recapture, Neyman-scott process, Palm intensity, Spatial capture-recapture, Thomas process, Unmanned aerial vehicles

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Fast, flexible alternatives to regular grid designs for spatial capture-recapture

    Durbach, I. N., Borchers, D. L., Sutherland, C. & Sharma, K., Feb 2021, In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 12, 2, p. 298-310

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. A latent capture history model for digital aerial surveys

    Borchers, D. L., Nightingale, P., Stevenson, B. C. & Fewster, R. M., 10 Dec 2020, In: Biometrics. Early View, 12 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Uncovering ecological state dynamics with hidden Markov models

    McClintock, B. T., Langrock, R., Gimenez, O., Cam, E., Borchers, D. L., Glennie, R. & Patterson, T. A., 19 Oct 2020, In: Ecology Letters. Early View, 26 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Using continuous-time spatial capture–recapture models to make inference about animal activity patterns

    Distiller, G. B., Borchers, D. L., Foster, R. J. & Harmsen, B. J., 9 Oct 2020, In: Ecology and Evolution. Early View, 12 p., e6822.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  5. Listening and watching: do camera traps or acoustic sensors more efficiently detect wild chimpanzees in an open habitat?

    Crunchant, A-S., Borchers, D., Kühl, H. & Piel, A., Apr 2020, In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 11, 4, p. 542-552

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Biometrics (Journal)

    Stephen Terrence Buckland (Editor)

    20052011

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  2. Biometrics (Journal)

    David Louis Borchers (Editor)

    2001 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

Related by journal

  1. A latent capture history model for digital aerial surveys

    Borchers, D. L., Nightingale, P., Stevenson, B. C. & Fewster, R. M., 10 Dec 2020, In: Biometrics. Early View, 12 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Inference in MCMC step selection models

    Michelot, T., Blackwell, P. G., Chamaillé-Jammes, S. & Matthiopoulos, J., 9 Dec 2019, In: Biometrics. Early View, 10 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Open population maximum likelihood spatial capture-recapture

    Glennie, R., Borchers, D. L., Murchie, M., Harmsen, B. J. & Foster, R. J., Dec 2019, In: Biometrics. 75, 4, p. 1345-1355 11 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Distance sampling detection functions: 2D or not 2D?

    Borchers, D. L. & Cox, M. J., 15 Jun 2017, In: Biometrics. 73, 2, p. 593-602 10 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 255284445

Top