Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Comparing humans and nonhuman great apes in the broken cloth problem: is their knowledge causal or perceptual?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

When presented with the broken cloth problem, both human children and nonhuman great apes prefer to pull a continuous cloth over a discontinuous cloth in order to obtain a desired object resting on top. This has been interpreted as evidence that they preferentially attend to the functionally relevant cues of the task (e.g., presence or absence of a gap along the cloth). However, there is controversy regarding whether great apes' behavior is underpinned by causal knowledge, involving abstract concepts (e.g., support, connection), or by perceptual knowledge, based on percepts (e.g., contact, continuity). We presented chimpanzees, orangutans, and 2-, 3-, and 4-year-old children with two versions of the broken cloth problem. The Real condition, made with paper strips, could be solved based on either perceptual cues or causal knowledge. The Painted condition, which looked very similar, could be solved only by attending to perceptual cues. All groups mastered the Real condition, in line with previous results. Older children (3- and 4-year-olds) performed significantly better in this condition than all other groups, but the performance of apes and children did not differ sharply, with 2-year-olds and apes obtaining similar results. In contrast, only 4-year-olds solved the Painted condition. We propose causal knowledge to explain the general good performance of apes and humans in the Real condition compared with the Painted condition. In addition, we suggest that symbolic knowledge might account for 4-year-olds' performance in the Painted condition. Our findings add to the growing literature supporting the idea that learning from arbitrary cues is not a good explanation for the performance of apes and humans on some kinds of physical task.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)174-189
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Experimental Child Psychology
Volume139
Early online date26 Jun 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2015

    Research areas

  • Children, Chimpanzees, Orangutans, Nroken cloth problem, Causal knowledge, Associative learning

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Inferring unseen causes: developmental and evolutionary origins

    Civelek, Z., Call, J. & Seed, A., 6 May 2020, In: Frontiers in Psychology. 11, 17 p., 872.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Establishing an infrastructure for collaboration in primate cognition research

    Altschul, D. M., Beran, M. J., Bohn, M., Call, J., DeTroy, S., Duguid, S. J., Egelkamp, C. L., Fichtel, C., Fischer, J., Flessert, M., Hanus, D., Haun, D. B. M., Haux, L. M., Hernandez-Aguilar, R. A., Herrmann, E., Hopper, L. M., Joly, M., Kano, F., Keupp, S., Melis, A. P. & 12 others, Motes Rodrigo, A., Ross, S. R., Sánchez-Amaro, A., Sato, Y., Schmitt, V., Schweinfurth, M. K., Seed, A. M., Taylor, D., Voelter, C. J., Warren, E., Watzek, J. & on behalf of Many Primates, 24 Oct 2019, In: PLoS One. 14, 10, 19 p., e0223675.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Comparative psychometrics: establishing what differs is central to understanding what evolves

    Voelter, C. J., Tinklenberg, B., Call, J. & Seed, A. M., 26 Sep 2018, In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. B, Biological Sciences. 373, 1756, 10 p., 20170283.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Abstract knowledge in the broken-string problem: evidence from nonhuman primates and pre-schoolers

    Mayer, C. P., Call, J., Albiach-Serrano, A., Visalberghi, E., Sabbatini, G. & Seed, A. M., 1 Oct 2014, In: PLoS One. 9, 10, 7 p., e108597.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. When does it pay to follow the crowd? Children optimize imitation of causally-irrelevant actions performed by a majority

    Evans, C. L., Burdett, E. R. R., Murray, K. & Carpenter, M., Dec 2021, In: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 212, 105229.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Common knowledge that help is needed increases helping behavior in children

    Siposova, B., Grueneisen, S., Helming, K., Tomasello, M. & Carpenter, M., Jan 2021, In: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 201, 104973.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Do 7-year-old children understand social leverage?

    Sánchez-Amaro, A., Duguid, S., Call, J. & Tomasello, M., Nov 2020, In: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 199, 104963.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Better all by myself: gaining personal experience, not watching others, improves 3-year-olds’ performance in a causal trap task

    Yuniarto, L., Gerson, S. & Seed, A. M., Jun 2020, In: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 194, 10 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  5. How prior experience and task presentation modulate innovation in 6-year-old-children

    Ebel, S. J., Hanus, D. & Call, J., Apr 2019, In: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 180, p. 87-103 17 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 204613962

Top