Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Credit, copyright, and the circulation of scientific knowledge: the Royal Society in the long nineteenth century

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DOI

Open Access permissions

Open

Author(s)

Aileen Fyfe, Julie McDougall-Waters, Noah Moxham

School/Research organisations

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the Royal Society's attitudes towards the copying, reprinting, and reuse of material from its Philosophical Transactions during the long nineteenth century. The contents of the Transactions circulated in print in a variety of ways beyond its traditional biannual parts and bound annual volumes. This included the private circulation of authors' separate copies of papers; the reissuing of papers in authors' collected works; the incorporation of material into other books; and the reporting and excerpting of material in the general scientific periodical literature. The Royal Society attempted to protect the originality and priority of the research published under its imprint, but it never sought to use copyright legislation to prevent (or to profit from) the reprinting or reuse of its research. We argue that copyright was in fact a poor tool for learned institutions like the Royal Society, which were more concerned with reputational credit than with financial credit and were adept at managing the delicate balance between institutional interests and those of individual authors. We demonstrate that the Royal Society's approach to reprinting and reuse was based on the philanthropic concept of a scholarly common good. It typically relied on a code of conduct enforced through tradition and moral suasion, rather than legislation.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)597-615
JournalVictorian Periodicals Review
Volume51
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2018

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Managing the growth of peer review at the Royal Society journals, 1865-1965

    Fyfe, A., Squazzoni, F., Torny, D. & Dondio, P., 15 Jul 2019, In : Science, Technology and Human Values. Online First, 25 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. What the history of copyright in academic publishing tells us about Open Research

    Fyfe, A., 3 Jun 2019

    Research output: Non-textual formWeb publication/site

  3. It's not all about the money: To help learned societies adjust to Plan S, treat them as more than just publishers

    Fyfe, A., 1 May 2019, Research Fortnight, p. 15 1 p.

    Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

  4. Opening up access to research: a film review of Paywall: the Business of Scholarship, directed and produced by Jason Schmitt, 2018

    Fyfe, A., 18 Apr 2019, Endeavour, In press.

    Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationBook/Film/Article review

  5. The Royal Society and the prehistory of peer review, 1665-1965

    Moxham, N. & Fyfe, A., Dec 2018, In : The Historical Journal. 61, 4, p. 863-889 863.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

ID: 256169144