Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Credit, copyright, and the circulation of scientific knowledge: the Royal Society in the long nineteenth century

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

DOI

Open Access permissions

Open

Author(s)

Aileen Fyfe, Julie McDougall-Waters, Noah Moxham

School/Research organisations

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the Royal Society's attitudes towards the copying, reprinting, and reuse of material from its Philosophical Transactions during the long nineteenth century. The contents of the Transactions circulated in print in a variety of ways beyond its traditional biannual parts and bound annual volumes. This included the private circulation of authors' separate copies of papers; the reissuing of papers in authors' collected works; the incorporation of material into other books; and the reporting and excerpting of material in the general scientific periodical literature. The Royal Society attempted to protect the originality and priority of the research published under its imprint, but it never sought to use copyright legislation to prevent (or to profit from) the reprinting or reuse of its research. We argue that copyright was in fact a poor tool for learned institutions like the Royal Society, which were more concerned with reputational credit than with financial credit and were adept at managing the delicate balance between institutional interests and those of individual authors. We demonstrate that the Royal Society's approach to reprinting and reuse was based on the philanthropic concept of a scholarly common good. It typically relied on a code of conduct enforced through tradition and moral suasion, rather than legislation.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)597-615
JournalVictorian Periodicals Review
Volume51
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2018

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Self-help for learned journals: scientific societies and the commerce of publishing in the 1950s

    Fyfe, A., 18 Mar 2021, In: History of Science. Online First, 25 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. The Royal Society and the noncommercial circulation of knowledge

    Fyfe, A., 21 Oct 2020, Reassembling Scholarly Communications: Histories, Infrastructures, and Global Politics of Open Access. Eve, M. P. & Gray, J. (eds.). MIT Press, p. 147-160

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

  3. The production, circulation, consumption and ownership of scientific knowledge: historical perspectives

    Fyfe, A., 6 Sep 2020, Glasgow: CREATe (UK Copyright and Creative Economy Centre, University of Glasgow), (CREATe Working Papers).

    Research output: Working paper

  4. Managing the growth of peer review at the Royal Society journals, 1865-1965

    Fyfe, A., Squazzoni, F., Torny, D. & Dondio, P., 1 May 2020, In: Science, Technology, and Human Values. 45, 3, p. 405-429 25 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  5. Special Issue:Editorship and the Editing of Scientific Journals, 1750–1950

    Fyfe, A. (ed.) & Gielas, A. M. (ed.), Feb 2020, In: Centaurus. 62, 1

    Research output: Contribution to journalSpecial issuepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Review of 'Bernard Shaw, W. T. Stead, and the New Journalism: Whitechapel, Parnell, Titanic, and the Great War' by Nelson Ritschel

    Goodwyn, H., 2018, In: Victorian Periodicals Review. 51, 1, p. 199-202

    Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article review

  2. Review of 'The News of the World and the British Press, 1843-2011', Laurel Brake, Chandrika Kaul, and Mark W. Turner, eds

    Goodwyn, H., 2017, In: Victorian Periodicals Review. 50, 1, p. 254-257

    Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article review

ID: 256169144

Top