Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Density estimation implications of increasing ambient noise on beaked whale click detection and classification

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned report

Abstract

Acoustic based density estimates are being increasingly used. Usually density estimation methods require one to evaluate the effective survey area of the acoustic sensors, or equivalently estimate the mean detection probability of detecting the animals or cues of interest. This is often done based on an estimated detection function, the probability of detecting an object of interest as a function of covariates, usually distance and additional covariates. If the actual survey data and the data used to estimate a detection function are not collected simultaneously, as in Marques et al. (2009), the estimated detection function might not correspond to the detection process that generated the survey data. This would lead to biaseddensity estimates.

Here we evaluate the influence of ambient noise in the detection and classification
of beaked whale clicks at the Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center
(AUTEC) hydrophones, to assess if the density estimates reported in Marques
et al. (2009) might have been biased. To do so we contaminated a data set with
increasing levels of ambient noise, and then estimated the detection function accounting for the noise level as an additional covariate. The results obtained suggest that for the particular results obtained at AUTEC’s deep water hydrophones the influence of ambient noise on the beaked whale’s click detection probability might have been minor, and hence unlikely to have had an impact on density estimates. However, we do not exclude the possibility that the results could be different under other scenarios.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
PublisherUniversity of St Andrews
Number of pages22
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Publication series

NameCREEM Technical Report
No.2010-1

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Evaluating the effect of measurement error in pairs of 3D bearings in point transect sampling estimates of density

    Marques, T. A., Duarte, P., Peixe, T., Moretti, D. & Thomas, L., 27 Mar 2018, University of St Andrews. 72 p. (CREEM Technical Report; no. 2018-1)

    Research output: Book/ReportOther report

  2. Comparing methods suitable for monitoring marine mammals in low visibility conditions during seismic surveys

    Verfuss, U. K., Gillespie, D., Gordon, J., Marques, T. A., Miller, B., Plunkett, R., Theriault, J. A., Tollit, D. J., Zitterbart, D. P., Hubert, P. & Thomas, L., Jan 2018, In : Marine Pollution Bulletin. 126, p. 1-18 18 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

  3. Techniques for estimating the size of low-density gopher tortoise populations

    Stober, J. M., Prieto-Gonzalez, R., Smith, L. L., Marques, T. A. & Thomas, L., 1 Dec 2017, In : Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management. 8, 2, p. 377-386 10 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Estimation bias under model selection for distance sampling detection functions

    Prieto Gonzalez, R., Thomas, L. & Marques, T. A., Sep 2017, In : Environmental and Ecological Statistics. 24, 3, p. 399-414 16 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Model-based approaches to deal with detectability: a comment on Hutto (2016a)

    Marques, T. A., Thomas, L., Kery, M., Buckland, S. T., Borchers, D. L., Rexstad, E., Fewster, R. M., Mackenzie, D. I., Royle, J. A., Guillera-Arroita, G., Handel, C. M., Pavlacky, D. C. & Camp, R. J., Jul 2017, In : Ecological Applications. 27, 5, p. 1694-1698 5 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

ID: 5009510