Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Detections of whale vocalizations by simultaneously deployed bottom-moored and deep-water mobile autonomous hydrophones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Author(s)

Selene Fregosi, Danielle Harris, Haruyoshi Matsumoto, David K. Mellinger, Jay Barlow, Simone Baumann-Pickering, Holger Klinck

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Advances in mobile autonomous platforms for oceanographic sensing, including gliders and deep-water profiling floats, have provided new opportunities for passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) of cetaceans. However, there are few direct comparisons of these mobile autonomous systems to more traditional methods, such as stationary bottom moored recorders. Cross-platform comparisons are necessary to enable interpretation of results across historical and contemporary surveys that use different recorder types, and to identify potential biases introduced by the platform. Understanding tradeoffs across recording platforms informs best practices for future cetacean monitoring efforts. This study directly compares the PAM capabilities of a glider (Seaglider) and a deep-water profiling float (QUEphone) to a stationary seafloor system (High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package, or HARP) deployed simultaneously over a 2 week period in the Catalina Basin, California, United States. Two HARPs were deployed 4 km apart while a glider and deep-water float surveyed within 20 km of the HARPs. Acoustic recordings were analyzed for the presence of multiple cetacean species, including beaked whales, delphinids, and minke whales. Variation in acoustic occurrence at 1-min (beaked whales only), hourly, and daily scales were examined. The number of minutes, hours, and days with beaked whale echolocation clicks were variable across recorders, likely due to differences in the noise floor of each recording system, the spatial distribution of the recorders, and the short detection radius of such a high-frequency, directional signal type. Delphinid whistles and clicks were prevalent across all recorders, and at levels that may have masked beaked whale vocalizations. The number and timing of hours and days with minke whale boing sounds were nearly identical across recorder types, as was expected given the relatively long propagation distance of boings. This comparison provides evidence that gliders and deep-water floats record cetaceans at similar detection rates to traditional stationary recorders at a single point. The spatiotemporal scale over which these single hydrophone systems record sounds is highly dependent on acoustic features of the sound source. Additionally, these mobile platforms provide improved spatial coverage which may be critical for species that produce calls that propagate only over short distances such as beaked whales.

Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number721
Number of pages18
JournalFrontiers in Marine Science
Volume7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Aug 2020

    Research areas

  • Glider, Deep-water float, Mobile autonomous platform, Passive acoustic monitoring, Beaked whales, Minke whales, Delphinids

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. A comparison of three methods for estimating call densities of migrating bowhead whales using passive acoustic monitoring

    Oedekoven, C. S., Marques, T. A., Harris, D., Thomas, L., Thode, A. M., Blackwell, S. B., Conrad, A. S. & Kim, K. H., 15 Jun 2021, In: Environmental and Ecological Statistics. 25 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. An open access dataset for developing automated detectors of Antarctic baleen whale sounds and performance evaluation of two commonly used detectors

    Miller, B. S., The IWC-SORP/SOOS Acoustic Trends Working Group, Balcazar, N., Nieukirk, S., Leroy, E. C., Aulich, M., Shabangu, F. W., Dziak, R. P., Lee, W. S., Hong, J. K. & Harris, D., 12 Jan 2021, In: Scientific Reports. 11, 18 p., 806.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Acoustic detection range and population density of Cuvier's beaked whales estimated from near-surface hydrophones

    Barlow, J., Fregosi, S., Thomas, L., Harris, D. & Griffiths, E. T., 5 Jan 2021, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 149, 1, p. 111-125 15 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. On the use of the Lloyd's Mirror effect to infer the depth of vocalizing fin whales

    Pereira, A., Harris, D., Tyack, P. & Matias, L., 1 Nov 2020, In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 148, 5, p. 3086-3101 16 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  5. Fin whale acoustic presence and song characteristics in seas to the southwest of Portugal

    Pereira, A., Harris, D., Tyack, P. & Matias, L., Apr 2020, In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 147, 4, p. 2235-2249 15 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Frontiers in Marine Science (Journal)

    Ife Okafor-Yarwood (Reviewer)

    3 Sep 2020 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesPeer review of manuscripts

  2. Frontiers in Marine Science (Journal)

    Theoni Photopoulou (Member of editorial board)

    2017 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesPeer review of manuscripts

  3. Frontiers in Marine Science (Journal)

    Luke Edward Rendell (Member of editorial board)

    2015 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

Related by journal

  1. Seasonal and ontogenetic variation in depth use by a critically endangered benthic elasmobranch and its implications for spatial management

    Thorburn, J. A., Wright, P., Lavender, E., Dodd, J., Neat, F., Martin, J., Lynam, C. & James, M. A., 19 Jul 2021, In: Frontiers in Marine Science. 8, 15 p., 656368.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Disentangling natural and anthropogenic forms of mortality and serious injury in a poorly studied pelagic dolphin

    Ashe, E., Williams, R., Morton, A. & Hammond, P. S., 21 Apr 2021, In: Frontiers in Marine Science. 8, 10 p., 606876.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Improving the accuracy of krill target strength using a shape catalog

    Bairstow, F. J., Gastauer, S., Finley, L., Edwards, T., Brown, C. T. A., Kawaguchi, S. & Cox, M., 7 Apr 2021, In: Frontiers in Marine Science. 8, 14 p., 658384.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Assessing population-level effects of anthropogenic disturbance on a marine mammal population

    Dunlop, R. A., Braithwaite, J., Mortensen, L. O. & Harris, C. M., 15 Mar 2021, In: Frontiers in Marine Science. 8, 12 p., 624981.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  5. Environmental awareness gained during a citizen science project in touristic resorts is maintained after 3 years since participation

    Meschini, M., Prati, F., Simoncini, G. A., Airi, V., Caroselli, E., Prada, F., Marchini, C., Machado Toffolo, M., Branchini, S., Brambilla, V., Covi, C. & Goffredo, S., 19 Feb 2021, In: Frontiers in Marine Science. 8, 11 p., 584644.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 270265832

Top