Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Developing the clinical components of a complex intervention for a glaucoma screening trial: a mixed methods study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Jennifer M. Burr, Marion K. Campbell, Susan E. Campbell, Jillian J. Francis, Alexandra Greene, Rodolfo Hernandez, Debra Hopkins, Sharon K. McCann, Luke D. Vale, Glaucoma Screening Platform Study

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Background: Glaucoma is a leading cause of avoidable blindness worldwide. Open angle glaucoma is the most common type of glaucoma. No randomised controlled trials have been conducted evaluating the effectiveness of glaucoma screening for reducing sight loss. It is unclear what the most appropriate intervention to be evaluated in any glaucoma screening trial would be. The purpose of this study was to develop the clinical components of an intervention for evaluation in a glaucoma (open angle) screening trial that would be feasible and acceptable in a UK eye-care service.

Methods: A mixed-methods study, based on the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework for complex interventions, integrating qualitative (semi-structured interviews with 46 UK eye-care providers, policy makers and health service commissioners), and quantitative (economic modelling) methods. Interview data were synthesised and used to revise the screening interventions compared within an existing economic model.

Results: The qualitative data indicated broad based support for a glaucoma screening trial to take place in primary care, using ophthalmic trained technical assistants supported by optometry input. The precise location should be tailored to local circumstances. There was variability in opinion around the choice of screening test and target population. Integrating the interview findings with cost-effectiveness criteria reduced 189 potential components to a two test intervention including either optic nerve photography or screening mode perimetry (a measure of visual field sensitivity) with or without tonometry (a measure of intraocular pressure). It would be more cost-effective, and thus acceptable in a policy context, to target screening for open angle glaucoma to those at highest risk but for both practicality and equity arguments the optimal strategy was screening a general population cohort beginning at age forty.

Conclusions: Interventions for screening for open angle glaucoma that would be feasible from a service delivery perspective were identified. Integration within an economic modelling framework explicitly highlighted the trade-off between cost-effectiveness, feasibility and equity. This study exemplifies the MRC recommendation to integrate qualitative and quantitative methods in developing complex interventions. The next step in the development pathway should encompass the views of service users.

Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number54
Number of pages10
JournalBMC Medical Research Methodology
Volume11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Apr 2011

    Research areas

  • Open-angle glaucoma, Diabetic-Retinopathy, Ocular hypertension, Cost-effectiveness, Program, Metaanalysis, Service, People

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Baseline characteristics of participants in the treatment of advanced glaucoma study: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

    King, A. J., Hudson, J., Fernie, G., Burr, J., Azuara-Blanco, A., Sparrow, J. M., Barton, K., Garway-Heath, D. F., Kernohan, A. & MacLennan, G., 13 Mar 2020, In : American Journal of Ophthalmology. 213, p. 186-194 9 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared with phacoemulsification cataract surgery (FACT): a randomised non-inferiority trial

    Day, A. C., Burr, J. M., Bennett, K., Bunce, C., Doré, C. J., Rubin, G. S., Nanavaty, M. A., Balaggan, K. S., Wilkins, M. R. & FACT trial group, 3 Mar 2020, In : Ophthalmology. In press, p. 1-8 8 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. A randomised, controlled, observer-masked trial of corneal cross-linking for progressive keratoconus in children: the KERALINK protocol

    Chowdhury, K., Dore, C., Burr, J. M., Bunce, C., Raynor, M., Edwards, M. & Larkin, D. F. P., 12 Sep 2019, In : BMJ Open. 9, 9, 6 p., e028761.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Five-year outcomes of a randomized trial of treatments for varicose veins

    Brittenden, J., Cooper, D., Dimitrova, M., Scotland, G., Cotton, S. C., Elders, A., MacLennan, G., Ramsay, C. R., Norrie, J., Burr, J. M., Campbell, B., Bachoo, P., Chetter, I., Gough, M., Earnshaw, J., Lees, T., Scott, J., Baker, S. A., Tassie, E., Francis, J. & 1 others, Campbell, M. K., 5 Sep 2019, In : New England Journal of Medicine. 381, p. 912-922

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Clear lens extraction for the management of primary angle closure glaucoma: surgical technique and refractive outcomes in the EAGLE cohort

    Day, A. C., Cooper, D., Burr, J., Foster, P. J., Friedman, D. S., Gazzard, G., Che-Hamzah, J., Aung, T., Ramsay, C. R. & Azuara-Blanco, A., Dec 2018, In : British Journal of Ophthalmology. 102, 12, p. 1658-1662 5 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Modelling reassurances of clinicians with Hidden Markov models

    Popov, V., Ellis-Robinson, A. & Humphris, G., 9 Jan 2019, In : BMC Medical Research Methodology. 19, 10 p., 11.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Sexual Health questions included in the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) Study: an international methodological pilot investigation

    Young, H., Költő, A., Reis, M., Saewyc, E. M., Moreau, N., Burke, L., Cosma, A., Windlin, B., Gabhainn, S. N. & Godeau, E., 5 Dec 2016, In : BMC Medical Research Methodology. 16, 12 p., 169.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Pre-validation methods for developing a patient reported outcome instrument

    Prior, M. E., Hamzah, J. C., Francis, J. J., Ramsay, C. R., Castillo, M. M., Campbell, S. E., Azuara-Blanco, A. & Burr, J. M., 9 Aug 2011, In : BMC Medical Research Methodology. 11, 9 p., 112.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 16572753

Top