Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Did the Basel process of capital regulation enhance the resiliency of European banks?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Author(s)

Thomas Gehrig, Maria Chiara Iannino

School/Research organisations

Abstract

This paper analyses the evolution of the safety and soundness of the European banking sector during the various stages of the Basel process of capital regulation. We document the evolution of various measures of systemic risk as the Basel process unfolds. Most strikingly we find that the exposure to systemic risk as measured by SRISK has been steeply rising for the highest quintile, moderately rising for the second quintile, and remaining roughly stationary for the remaining three quintiles of listed European banks. This observation suggests that during the Basel process, systemic risk has been contained for the majority of European banks, but not for the largest and riskiest institutions. When analyzing the sources of systemic risk we find compelling evidence that the increase in exposure to systemic risk (SRISK) is tied to the implementation of internal models for determining credit risk, as well as market risk. Based on this evidence, the sub-prime crisis found especially the largest and more systemic banks ill-prepared and lacking resiliency. This condition has been aggravated during the European sovereign crisis. The Banking Union has not restored aggregate resiliency to pre-crisis levels. Finally, low-interest rates considerably affect the contribution to systemic risk, particularly for the riskier banks.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number100904
JournalJournal of Financial Stability
Volume55
Early online date15 Jun 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2021

    Research areas

  • Bank capital, Systemic risk, Internal risk-based models, Contagion, Resilience, Regulation

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. “Social Responsibility and Bank Resiliency”

    Iannino, M. C., Gehrig, T. & Unger, S., 16 Feb 2021, The Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), p. 1-38, 38 p. (CEPR Discussion paper series; no. DP15816).

    Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

  2. Signaling through timing of stock splits

    Iannino, M. C. & Zhuk, S., 7 Dec 2020, St Andrews: University of St Andrews, p. 1-49, 49 p. (School of Economics and Finance discussion paper; no. 2009).

    Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

  3. “Did the Basel Process of Capital Regulation Enhance the Resiliency of European Banks?”

    Iannino, M. C. & Gehrig, T., 27 Sep 2018, Bank of Finland, p. 1-50, 50 p. (Bank of Finland discussion paper; vol. 2018, no. 16).

    Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

  4. Capital regulation and systemic risk in the insurance sector

    Gehrig, T. & Iannino, M. C., 8 May 2018, In: Journal of Financial Economic Policy. 10, 2, p. 237-263

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Deposit insurance and bank dividend policy

    Che Johari, E. E., Chronopoulos, D., Scholtens, B., Sobiech, A. L. & Wilson, J. O. S., Jun 2020, In: Journal of Financial Stability. 48, 12 p., 100745.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Heterogeneous market structure and systemic risk: evidence from dual banking systems

    Abedifar, P., Giudici, P. & Hashem, S. Q., Dec 2017, In: Journal of Financial Stability. 33, p. 96-119

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Monetary policy and financial stability in the long run: a simple game-theoretic approach

    Cao, J. & Chollete, L., Feb 2017, In: Journal of Financial Stability. 28, p. 125-142 18 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 274671765

Top