Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Differentiation measures for conservation genetics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DOI

Open Access permissions

Open

Author(s)

Lou Jost, Frederick Archer, Sarah Flanagan, Oscar Gaggiotti, Sean Hoban, Emily Latch

School/Research organisations

Abstract

We compare the two main classes of measures of population structure in genetics: (1) fixation measures such as FST, GST, and θ, and (2) allelic differentiation measures such as Jost’s D and entropy differentiation. These two groups of measures quantify complementary aspects of population structure, which have no necessary relationship with each other. We focus especially on empirical aspects of population structure relevant to conservation analyses. At the empirical level, the first set of measures quantify nearness to fixation, while the second set of measures quantify relative degree of allelic differentiation. The two sets of measures do not compete with each other. Fixation measures are often misinterpreted as measures of allelic differentiation in conservation applications; we give examples and theoretical explanations showing why this interpretation can mislead. This misinterpretation has led to the mistaken belief that the absolute number of migrants determines allelic differentiation between demes when mutation rate is low; we show that in the finite island model the absolute number of migrants determines nearness to fixation, not allelic differentiation. We show that a different quantity, the factor which controls Jost’s D, is a good predictor of the evolution of the actual genetic divergence between demes at equilibrium in this model. We also show that when conservation decisions require judgements about differences in genetic composition between demes, allelic differentiation measures should be used instead of fixation measures. Allelic differentiation of fast-mutating markers can be used to rank pairs or sets of demes according to their differentiation, but the allelic differentiation at coding loci of interest should be directly measured in order to judge its actual magnitude at these loci.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1139-1148
Number of pages10
JournalEvolutionary Applications
Volume11
Issue number7
Early online date29 Jan 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2018

    Research areas

  • Genetic differentiation indices, Fixation indices, Genetic diversity

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Patterns of phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation in the wide elevation range of the alpine plant Arabis alpina

    de Villemereuil, P., Mouterde, M., Gaggiotti, O. E. & Till-Buttraud, I., Sep 2018, In : Journal of Ecology. 106, 5, p. 1952–1971 20 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Diversity from genes to ecosystems: a unifying framework to study variation across biological metrics and scales

    Gaggiotti, O. E., Chao, A., Peres-Neto, P., Chiu, C-H., Edwards, C., Fortin, M-J., Jost, L., Richards, C. & Selkoe, K., 1 Aug 2018, In : Evolutionary Applications. 11, 7, p. 1176-1193 18 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Incorporating non-equilibrium dynamics into demographic history inferences of a migratory marine species

    Carroll, E. L., Alderman, R., Bannister, J. L., Bérube, M., Best, P. B., Boren, L., Baker, C. S., Constantine, R., Findlay, K., Harcourt, R., Lemaire, L., Palsbøll, P. J., Patenaude, N. J., Rowntree, V. J., Seger, J., Steel, D., Valenzuela, L. O., Watson, M. & Gaggiotti, O. E., 3 May 2018, In : Heredity. 16 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Identifying consistent allele frequency differences in studies of stratified populations

    Wiberg, R. A. W., Gaggiotti, O. E., Morrissey, M. B. & Ritchie, M. G., Dec 2017, In : Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 8, 12, p. 1899-1909

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Disentangling the relative merits and disadvantages of parentage analysis and assignment tests for inferring population connectivity

    Christie, M., Meirmans, P., Gaggiotti, O. E., Toonen, R. & White, C., 1 Jul 2017, In : ICES Journal of Marine Science. 74, 6, p. 1749-1762

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Diversity from genes to ecosystems: a unifying framework to study variation across biological metrics and scales

    Gaggiotti, O. E., Chao, A., Peres-Neto, P., Chiu, C-H., Edwards, C., Fortin, M-J., Jost, L., Richards, C. & Selkoe, K., 1 Aug 2018, In : Evolutionary Applications. 11, 7, p. 1176-1193 18 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Genetic and genomic monitoring with minimally invasive sampling methods

    Carroll, E. L., Bruford, M., DeWoody, J. A., Leroy, G., Strand, A., Waits, L. & Wang, J., Aug 2018, In : Evolutionary Applications. 11, 7, p. 1094-1119 26 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

  3. Modelling the invasion history of Sinanodonta woodiana in Europe: tracking the routes of a sedentary aquatic invader with mobile parasitic larvae

    Konečný, A., Popa, O., Bartáková, V., Douda, K., Bryja, J., Smith, C. H., Popa, L. & Reichard, M., Dec 2018, In : Evolutionary Applications. 11, 10, p. 1975-1989 15 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Next-generation metrics for monitoring genetic erosion within populations of conservation concern

    Leroy, G., Carroll, E. L., Bruford, M. W., DeWoody, J. A., Strand, A., Waits, L. & Wang, J., Aug 2018, In : Evolutionary Applications. 11, 7, p. 1066-1083 18 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

ID: 251827337