Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Differentiation measures for conservation genetics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

DOI

Open Access permissions

Open

Author(s)

Lou Jost, Frederick Archer, Sarah Flanagan, Oscar Gaggiotti, Sean Hoban, Emily Latch

School/Research organisations

Abstract

We compare the two main classes of measures of population structure in genetics: (1) fixation measures such as FST, GST, and θ, and (2) allelic differentiation measures such as Jost’s D and entropy differentiation. These two groups of measures quantify complementary aspects of population structure, which have no necessary relationship with each other. We focus especially on empirical aspects of population structure relevant to conservation analyses. At the empirical level, the first set of measures quantify nearness to fixation, while the second set of measures quantify relative degree of allelic differentiation. The two sets of measures do not compete with each other. Fixation measures are often misinterpreted as measures of allelic differentiation in conservation applications; we give examples and theoretical explanations showing why this interpretation can mislead. This misinterpretation has led to the mistaken belief that the absolute number of migrants determines allelic differentiation between demes when mutation rate is low; we show that in the finite island model the absolute number of migrants determines nearness to fixation, not allelic differentiation. We show that a different quantity, the factor which controls Jost’s D, is a good predictor of the evolution of the actual genetic divergence between demes at equilibrium in this model. We also show that when conservation decisions require judgements about differences in genetic composition between demes, allelic differentiation measures should be used instead of fixation measures. Allelic differentiation of fast-mutating markers can be used to rank pairs or sets of demes according to their differentiation, but the allelic differentiation at coding loci of interest should be directly measured in order to judge its actual magnitude at these loci.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1139-1148
Number of pages10
JournalEvolutionary Applications
Volume11
Issue number7
Early online date29 Jan 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2018

    Research areas

  • Genetic differentiation indices, Fixation indices, Genetic diversity

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Common garden experiments to study local adaptation need to account for population structure

    de Villemereuil, P., Gaggiotti, O. E. & Goudet, J., 12 Nov 2020, In: Journal of Ecology. Early View

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

  2. Genetic diversity and connectivity of southern right whales (Eubalaena australis) found in the Brazil and Chile–Peru wintering grounds and the South Georgia (Islas Georgias del Sur) feeding ground

    Carroll, E. L., Ott, P. H., McMillan, L. F., Galletti Vernazzani, B., Neveceralova, P., Vermeulen, E., Gaggiotti, O. E., Andriolo, A., Baker, C. S., Bamford, C., Best, P., Cabrera, E., Calderan, S., Chirife, A., Fewster, R. M., Flores, P. A. C., Frasier, T., Freitas, T. R. O., Groch, K., Hulva, P. & 10 others, Kennedy, A., Leaper, R., Leslie, M. S., Moore, M., Oliveira, L., Seger, J., Stepien, E. N., Valenzuela, L. O., Zerbini, A. & Jackson, J. A., May 2020, In: Journal of Heredity. 111, 3, p. 263-276 14 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Accounting for stochasticity in demographic compensation along the elevational range of an alpine plant

    Andrello, M., de Villemereuil, P., Carboni, M., Busson, D., Fortin, M-J., Gaggiotti, O. E. & Till-Bottraud, I., 14 Apr 2020, In: Ecology Letters. 23, 5, p. 870-880 11 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Landscape, colonization and life history: their effects on genetic diversity in four sympatric species inhabiting a dendritic system

    Ruzzante, D. E., McCraken, G. R., Salisbury, S. J., Brewis, H., Keefe, D., Gaggiotti, O. E. & Perry, R., Dec 2019, In: Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 76, 12, p. 2288-2302

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. A genetic assessment of the human-facilitated colonization history of black swans in Australia and New Zealand

    Montano, V., van Dongen, W. F. D., Weston, M. A., Mulder, R. A., Robinson, R. W., Cowling, M. & Guay, P-J., Mar 2018, In: Evolutionary Applications. 11, 3, p. 364-375 12 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Diversity from genes to ecosystems: a unifying framework to study variation across biological metrics and scales

    Gaggiotti, O. E., Chao, A., Peres-Neto, P., Chiu, C-H., Edwards, C., Fortin, M-J., Jost, L., Richards, C. & Selkoe, K., 17 Jul 2018, In: Evolutionary Applications. 11, 7, p. 1176-1193 18 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Genetic and genomic monitoring with minimally invasive sampling methods

    Carroll, E. L., Bruford, M., DeWoody, J. A., Leroy, G., Strand, A., Waits, L. & Wang, J., Aug 2018, In: Evolutionary Applications. 11, 7, p. 1094-1119 26 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

  4. Modelling the invasion history of Sinanodonta woodiana in Europe: tracking the routes of a sedentary aquatic invader with mobile parasitic larvae

    Konečný, A., Popa, O., Bartáková, V., Douda, K., Bryja, J., Smith, C. H., Popa, L. & Reichard, M., Dec 2018, In: Evolutionary Applications. 11, 10, p. 1975-1989 15 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 251827337

Top