Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Discourses of on-farm wind energy generation in the UK farming press

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

School/Research organisations

Abstract

As the owners of the majority of land in the U.K., farmers are well placed to contribute to renewable energy targets. Media coverage can both drive and reflect farmers’ views about renewable energy but has been largely unexplored to date. This article uses discourse analysis to examine the evolution of coverage of one form of renewable energy – on-farm wind – in the U.K. farming press from 1980 to 2013. We identified a diverse debate with five major discourses. On-farm wind turbines are alternatively represented as: profitable farm diversification opportunities; producers of clean energy; important for rural development and sources of conflict. Although press coverage predominantly encourages wind energy production, a further discourse advises farmers to ‘Proceed with Caution’. While emphasising images and values which have widespread affinity among U.K. farmers, the press have increasingly employed an economic frame, constructing wind energy generation as a farm diversification strategy. The most recent farming press coverage predominantly encourages an instrumental approach to wind energy, crowding out other (non-economic) rationales and marginalising local community concerns. This appears to reflect the financial orientation of recent policy support (particularly Feed-in Tariffs), and may have long-term costs in enabling sustainable energy production systems.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-17
JournalJournal of Environmental Policy and Planning
VolumeLatest articles
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Sep 2016

    Research areas

  • Discourse analysis, Renewable energy, Media analysis, Feed-in tarrifs, Farming press

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Community-led initiatives’ everyday politics for sustainability – Conflicting rationalities and aspirations for change?

    Fischer, A., Holstead, K. L., Hendrickson, C., Virkkula, O. & Prampolini, A., 1 Sep 2017, In : Environment and Planning A. 49, 9, p. 1986-2006

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Natural flood management from the farmer's perspective: criteria that affect uptake

    Holstead, K. L., Kenyon, W., Rouillard, J. J., Hopkins, J. & Galán-Díaz, C., 1 Jun 2017, In : Journal of Flood Risk Management. 10, 2, p. 205-218 14 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Challenges to enabling and implementing Natural Flood Management in Scotland

    Waylen, K. A., Holstead, K. L., Colley, K. & Hopkins, J., 27 Apr 2017, In : Journal of Flood Risk Management. 11, S2, p. S1078-S1089

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Digital innovation through partnership between nature conservation organisations and academia: a qualitative impact assessment

    Galán-Díaz, C., Edwards, P., Nelson, J. D. & van der Wal, R., Nov 2015, In : Ambio. 44, 4, p. 538-549 12 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. The spatial development basis of Marine Spatial Planning in the United Kingdom

    Smith, H. D., Ballinger, R. C. & Stojanovic, T. A., 2012, In : Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. 14, 1, p. 29-47

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Rhetoric and Reporting of Public Participation in Landscape Policy

    Conrad, E., Cassar, L. F., Jones, M., Eiter, S., Izaovicova, Z., Barankova, Z., Christie, M. & Fazey, I., 2011, In : Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. 13, 1, p. 23-47 25 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 246519668