Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Distance sampling and the challenge of monitoring butterfly populations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Nick J. B. Isaac, Katie L. Cruickshanks, Ann M. Weddle, J. Marcus Rowcliffe, Tom M. Brereton, Roger L. H. Dennis, David M. Shuker, Chris D. Thomas

School/Research organisations

Abstract

1. Abundance indices generated by the UK Butterfly Monitoring Scheme (UKBMS) have been influential in informing our understanding of environmental change and highlighting UK conservation priorities. Here, we critically evaluate the standard Pollard Walk methodology employed by the UKBMS.

2. We consider the systematic sampling biases among different butterfly species and biotopes using distance sampling. We collected over 5000 observations on 17 species using distance sampling at 13 study sites in England and Wales. We fitted detection functions to explore variation in detectability among species and sites.

3. Our results suggest that around one-third of individual butterflies in the Pollard Walk box were missed. However, detectability varies markedly among species and sites. We provide the first species-specific estimates of detectability for converting Pollard Walk data into population densities. A few species show no drop off in detectability and most require only a modest correction factor, but for the least detectable species, we estimate that 3/4 of individuals are not recorded.

4. Much of the variation among sites is explained by substantially higher detectability among sites in England than inWales, which had different recorders. Biological traits have only limited explanatory power in distinguishing detectable vs undetectable species.

5. The variation in detectability is small compared with the variation in true abundance, such that population density estimates from the Pollard Walk are highly correlated with those derived from distance sampling.

6. These results are used to evaluate the robustness of the Pollard Walk for comparisons of abundance across species, across sites and over time. UKBMS data provide a good reflection of relative abundance for most species and of large-scale trends in abundance. We also consider the practicalities of applying distance sampling to butterfly monitoring in general. Distance sampling is a valuable tool for quantifying bias and imprecision and has a role in surveying species of conservation concern, but is not viable as a wholesale replacement for simpler methods for large-scale monitoring of multispecies butterfly communities by volunteer recorders.

Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)585-594
Number of pages10
JournalMethods in Ecology and Evolution
Volume2
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2011

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. A single pleiotropic locus influences the rate of hybridization between two sibling species of Lygaeus bugs

    Balfour, V., Black, D. & Shuker, D. M., Nov 2020, In : Ecology and Evolution. 10, 21, p. 12224-12232 9 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Genomics of sex allocation in the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis

    Pannebakker, B. A., Cook, N., van den Heuvel, J., van de Zande, L. & Shuker, D. M., 20 Jul 2020, In : BMC Genomics. 21, 14 p., 499.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Mating failure shapes the patterns of sperm precedence in an insect

    Balfour, V. L., Black, D. & Shuker, D. M., 27 Jan 2020, In : Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 74, 14 p., 25.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Validating the demethylating effects of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine in insects requires a whole-genome approach (A reply to Ellers et al.)

    Cook, N., Parker, D. J., Tauber, E., Pannebakker, B. A. & Shuker, D. M., Sep 2019, In : American Naturalist. 194, 3

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Local mate competition modifies the costs of mating in a mostly monandrous parasitoid wasp

    Boulton, R. A., Cook, N., Greenway, E. V., Glaser, G. L., Green, J. & Shuker, D. M., 5 Apr 2019, In : Behavioral Ecology. 30, 2, p. 417-425 9 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Methods in Ecology and Evolution (Journal)

    Michael Blair Morrissey (Member of editorial board)

    1 Jan 20171 Jan 2020

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  2. Methods in Ecology and Evolution (Journal)

    Theoni Photopoulou (Editor)

    2017 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  3. Methods in Ecology and Evolution (Journal)

    Oscar Eduardo Gaggiotti (Member of editorial board)

    1 Sep 2014 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

Related by journal

  1. A field and video-annotation guide for baited remote underwater stereo-video surveys of demersal fish assemblages

    Langlois, T., Goetze, J., Bond, T., Monk, J., Abesamis, R. A., Asher, J., Barrett, N., Bernard, A. T. F., Bouchet, P. J., Birt, M. J., Cappo, M., Currey-Randall, L. M., Driessen, D., Fairclough, D. V., Fullwood, L. A. F., Gibbons, B. A., Harasti, D., Heupel, M. R., Hicks, J., Holmes, T. H. & 21 others, Huveneers, C., Ierodiaconou, D., Jordan, A., Knott, N. A., Lindfield, S., Malcolm, H. A., McLean, D., Meekan, M., Miller, D., Mitchell, P. J., Newman, S. J., Radford, B., Rolim, F. A., Saunders, B. J., Stowar, M., Smith, A. N. H., Travers, M. J., Wakefield, C. B., Whitmarsh, S. K., Williams, J. & Harvey, E. S., Nov 2020, In : Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 11, 11, p. 1401-1409

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. A spatial capture-recapture model to estimate call rate and population density from passive acoustic surveys

    Stevenson, B. C., van Dam-Bates, P., Young, C. K. Y. & Measey, J., 29 Oct 2020, In : Methods in Ecology and Evolution. Accepted Articles

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Listening and watching: do camera traps or acoustic sensors more efficiently detect wild chimpanzees in an open habitat?

    Crunchant, A-S., Borchers, D., Kühl, H. & Piel, A., Apr 2020, In : Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 11, 4, p. 542-552

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Revisiting advice on the analysis of count data

    Morrissey, M. B. & Ruxton, G. D., 26 Jul 2020, In : Methods in Ecology and Evolution. Early View, 8 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 20762970

Top