Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Distance sampling and the challenge of monitoring butterfly populations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Author(s)

Nick J. B. Isaac, Katie L. Cruickshanks, Ann M. Weddle, J. Marcus Rowcliffe, Tom M. Brereton, Roger L. H. Dennis, David M. Shuker, Chris D. Thomas

School/Research organisations

Abstract

1. Abundance indices generated by the UK Butterfly Monitoring Scheme (UKBMS) have been influential in informing our understanding of environmental change and highlighting UK conservation priorities. Here, we critically evaluate the standard Pollard Walk methodology employed by the UKBMS.

2. We consider the systematic sampling biases among different butterfly species and biotopes using distance sampling. We collected over 5000 observations on 17 species using distance sampling at 13 study sites in England and Wales. We fitted detection functions to explore variation in detectability among species and sites.

3. Our results suggest that around one-third of individual butterflies in the Pollard Walk box were missed. However, detectability varies markedly among species and sites. We provide the first species-specific estimates of detectability for converting Pollard Walk data into population densities. A few species show no drop off in detectability and most require only a modest correction factor, but for the least detectable species, we estimate that 3/4 of individuals are not recorded.

4. Much of the variation among sites is explained by substantially higher detectability among sites in England than inWales, which had different recorders. Biological traits have only limited explanatory power in distinguishing detectable vs undetectable species.

5. The variation in detectability is small compared with the variation in true abundance, such that population density estimates from the Pollard Walk are highly correlated with those derived from distance sampling.

6. These results are used to evaluate the robustness of the Pollard Walk for comparisons of abundance across species, across sites and over time. UKBMS data provide a good reflection of relative abundance for most species and of large-scale trends in abundance. We also consider the practicalities of applying distance sampling to butterfly monitoring in general. Distance sampling is a valuable tool for quantifying bias and imprecision and has a role in surveying species of conservation concern, but is not viable as a wholesale replacement for simpler methods for large-scale monitoring of multispecies butterfly communities by volunteer recorders.

Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)585-594
Number of pages10
JournalMethods in Ecology and Evolution
Volume2
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2011

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Environmental correlates of sexual signaling in the Heteroptera: a prospective study

    Gourevitch, E. H. Z. & Shuker, D. M., 30 Nov 2021, In: Insect. 12, 12, 28 p., 1079.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

  2. The definition of sexual selection: a response to comments on Shuker and Kvarnemo

    Shuker, D. M. & Kvarnemo, C., 9 Aug 2021, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Behavioral Ecology. Advance articles

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

  3. The definition of sexual selection

    Shuker, D. M. & Kvarnemo, C., 7 Aug 2021, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Behavioral Ecology. Advance Article, 14 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Context-dependent use of visual cues in the shell selection behaviour of the hermit crab Pagurus bernhardus

    Rimmer, J. E. V., Todd, C. D. & Shuker, D. M., Jul 2021, In: Behavioural Processes. 188, 104414.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  5. The rationality of decisions depends on behavioural context

    Glaser, G. L., Miller, M. C., Healy, S. D. & Shuker, D. M., 5 Dec 2020, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Behavioural Processes. In-press, 104293.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Signs of life: oxygen sensors confirm viability, measure oxygen consumption and provide rapid, effective contamination monitoring for field-based tissue culture

    Robinson, K. J., Armstrong, H. C., Moss, S. E. W., Oller, L., Hall, A. J. & Bennett, K. A., Dec 2021, In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 12, 12, p. 2410-2420 11 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Managing risk and uncertainty in systematic conservation planning with insufficient information

    Popov, V., Shah, P., Runting, R. K. & Rhodes, J. R., 1 Oct 2021, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution. Early View, 13 p., 13725.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Estimating species relative abundances from museum records

    Gotelli, N. J., Booher, D. B., Urban, M. C., Ulrich, W., Suarez, A. V., Skelly, D. K., Russell, D. J., Rowe, R. J., Rothendler, M., Rios, N., Rehan, S. M., Ni, G., Moreau, C. S., Magurran, A. E., Jones, F. A. M., Graves, G. R., Fiera, C., Burkhardt, U. & Primack, R. B., 7 Sep 2021, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution. Early View, 13 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Measuring temporal change in alpha diversity: a framework integrating taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity and the iNEXT.3D standardization

    Chao, A., Henderson, P. A., Chiu, C-H., Moyes, F., Hu, K-H., Dornelas, M. & Magurran, A. E., 24 Aug 2021, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution. Early View, 15 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  5. A standardisation framework for bio-logging data to advance ecological research and conservation

    Sequeira, A. M. M., O’Toole, M., Keates, T. R., McDonnell, L. H., Braun, C. D., Hoenner, X., Jaine, F. R. A., Jonsen, I. D., Newman, P., Pye, J., Bograd, S. J., Hays, G. C., Hazen, E. L., Holland, M., Tsontos, V., Blight, C., Cagnacci, F., Davidson, S. C., Dettki, H., Duarte, C. M. & 22 others, Dunn, D. C., Eguíluz, V. M., Fedak, M., Gleiss, A. C., Hammerschlag, N., Hindell, M. A., Holland, K., Janekovic, I., McKinzie, M. K., Muelbert, M. M. C., Pattiaratchi, C., Rutz, C., Sims, D. W., Simmons, S. E., Townsend, B., Whoriskey, F., Woodward, B., Costa, D. P., Heupel, M. R., McMahon, C. R., Harcourt, R. & Weise, M., Jun 2021, In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 12, 6, p. 996-1007

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Methods in Ecology and Evolution (Journal)

    Chris Sutherland (Member of editorial board)

    22 Jan 2018

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  2. Methods in Ecology and Evolution (Journal)

    Michael Blair Morrissey (Member of editorial board)

    1 Jan 20171 Jan 2020

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  3. Methods in Ecology and Evolution (Journal)

    Theoni Photopoulou (Editor)

    2017 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  4. Methods in Ecology and Evolution (Journal)

    Oscar Eduardo Gaggiotti (Member of editorial board)

    1 Sep 2014 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

ID: 20762970

Top