Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Distance sampling and the challenge of monitoring butterfly populations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Nick J. B. Isaac, Katie L. Cruickshanks, Ann M. Weddle, J. Marcus Rowcliffe, Tom M. Brereton, Roger L. H. Dennis, David M. Shuker, Chris D. Thomas

School/Research organisations

Abstract

1. Abundance indices generated by the UK Butterfly Monitoring Scheme (UKBMS) have been influential in informing our understanding of environmental change and highlighting UK conservation priorities. Here, we critically evaluate the standard Pollard Walk methodology employed by the UKBMS.

2. We consider the systematic sampling biases among different butterfly species and biotopes using distance sampling. We collected over 5000 observations on 17 species using distance sampling at 13 study sites in England and Wales. We fitted detection functions to explore variation in detectability among species and sites.

3. Our results suggest that around one-third of individual butterflies in the Pollard Walk box were missed. However, detectability varies markedly among species and sites. We provide the first species-specific estimates of detectability for converting Pollard Walk data into population densities. A few species show no drop off in detectability and most require only a modest correction factor, but for the least detectable species, we estimate that 3/4 of individuals are not recorded.

4. Much of the variation among sites is explained by substantially higher detectability among sites in England than inWales, which had different recorders. Biological traits have only limited explanatory power in distinguishing detectable vs undetectable species.

5. The variation in detectability is small compared with the variation in true abundance, such that population density estimates from the Pollard Walk are highly correlated with those derived from distance sampling.

6. These results are used to evaluate the robustness of the Pollard Walk for comparisons of abundance across species, across sites and over time. UKBMS data provide a good reflection of relative abundance for most species and of large-scale trends in abundance. We also consider the practicalities of applying distance sampling to butterfly monitoring in general. Distance sampling is a valuable tool for quantifying bias and imprecision and has a role in surveying species of conservation concern, but is not viable as a wholesale replacement for simpler methods for large-scale monitoring of multispecies butterfly communities by volunteer recorders.

Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)585-594
Number of pages10
JournalMethods in Ecology and Evolution
Volume2
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2011

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Validating the demethylating effects of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine in insects requires a whole-genome approach (A reply to Ellers et al.)

    Cook, N., Parker, D. J., Tauber, E., Pannebakker, B. A. & Shuker, D. M., Sep 2019, In : American Naturalist. 194, 3

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Local mate competition modifies the costs of mating in a mostly monandrous parasitoid wasp

    Boulton, R. A., Cook, N., Greenway, E. V., Glaser, G. L., Green, J. & Shuker, D. M., 5 Apr 2019, In : Behavioral Ecology. 30, 2, p. 417-425 9 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. The fitness effects of a pale mutant in the aposematic seed bug Lygaeus simulans indicate pleiotropy between warning coloration and life history

    Balfour, V. L., Aumont, C., Dougherty, L. R. & Shuker, D. M., Dec 2018, In : Ecology and Evolution. 8, 24, p. 12855-12866 12 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. An inconvenient truth: the unconsidered benefits of convenience polyandry

    Boulton, R. A., Zuk, M. & Shuker, D. M., Dec 2018, In : Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 33, 12, 12 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Divergence is not speciation, or why we need females: a comment on Tinghitella et al

    Burdfield-Steel, E. R. & Shuker, D. M., 3 Jul 2018, In : Behavioral Ecology. 29, 4, p. 801

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Methods in Ecology and Evolution (Journal)

    Michael Blair Morrissey (Member of editorial board)
    1 Jan 20171 Jan 2020

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  2. Methods in Ecology and Evolution (Journal)

    Theoni Photopoulou (Editor)
    2017 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  3. Methods in Ecology and Evolution (Journal)

    Oscar Eduardo Gaggiotti (Member of editorial board)
    1 Sep 2014 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

Related by journal

  1. A 2.6-gram sound and movement tag for studying the acoustic scene and kinematics of echolocating bats

    Stidsholt, L., Johnson, M., Beedholm, K., Jakobsen, L., Kugler, K., Brinkløv, S., Salles, A., Moss, C. F. & Madsen, P. T., Jan 2019, In : Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 10, 1, p. 48-58 11 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Model selection with overdispersed distance sampling data

    Howe, E. J., Buckland, S. T., Després-Einspenner, M-L. & Kühl, H. S., Jan 2019, In : Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 10, 1, p. 38-47

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. State-switching continuous-time correlated random walks

    Michelot, T. & Blackwell, P. G., 14 Feb 2019, In : Methods in Ecology and Evolution. Early View

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. The Langevin diffusion as a continuous-time model of animal movement and habitat selection

    Michelot, T., Gloaguen, P., Blackwell, P. G. & Etienne, M-P., 24 Aug 2019, In : Methods in Ecology and Evolution. Early View

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. inlabru: an R package for Bayesian spatial modelling from ecological survey data

    Bachl, F. E., Lindgren, F., Borchers, D. L. & Illian, J. B., Jun 2019, In : Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 10, 6, p. 760-766 7 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 20762970

Top