Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Does access to a portable ophthalmoscope improve skill acquisition in direct ophthalmoscopy? A method comparison study in undergraduate medical education

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

J A Gilmour-White, A Picton, Andrew Blaikie, A K Denniston, R Blanch, J Coleman, P I Murray

School/Research organisations

Abstract


Background: Direct ophthalmoscopy (DO) is an essential skill for medical graduates but there are multiple barriers to learning this. Medical students and junior doctors typically lack confidence in DO. Most students do not own an ophthalmoscope and learn via ward devices that vary in design and usability. The Arclight ophthalmoscope (AO) is an easy to use, low-cost and portable device that could help address device access. This study aimed to assess the impact of personal ownership of an AO on DO skill acquisition and competency amongst medical students in the clinical environment.

Methods: Method comparison study with 42 medical students randomised to either traditional device ophthalmoscope (TDO) control or AO intervention group during an 18-week medical placement. Three objective assessments of DO competency were performed at the beginning and end of the placement: vertical cup to disc ratio (VCDR) measurement, fundus photo multiple-choice questions (F-MCQ) and model slide examination (MSE). DO examinations performed during the placement were recorded via an electronic logbook.

Results: Students in both groups recorded a median number of six examinations each during an eighteen-week placement. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in any of the objective assessment measures (VCDR p = 0.561, MCQ p = 0.872, Model p = 0.772). Both groups demonstrated a minor improvement in VCDR measurement but a negative performance change in F-MCQ and MSE assessments.

Conclusions: Students do not practice ophthalmoscopy often, even with constant access to their own portable device. The lack of significant difference between the groups suggests that device access alone is not the major factor affecting frequency of DO performance and consequent skill acquisition. Improving student engagement with ophthalmoscopy will require a more wide-ranging approach.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number201
Number of pages8
JournalBMC Medical Education
Volume19
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Jun 2019

    Research areas

  • Undergraduate medical education, Ophthalmology, Direct ophthalmoscopy

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. A mixed methods comparative evaluation of a low cost otoscope (Arclight) with a traditional device in twenty-one clinicians

    Hey, S. Y., Buckley, J. C., Shahsavari, S., Kousha, O., Haddow, K. A., Blaikie, A. & Walker, F. D. L., 6 Aug 2019, In : Clinical Otolaryngology. Early View, 4 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. The incidence of idiopathic intracranial hypertension in Scotland: a SOSU study

    Goudie, C., Shah, P., McKee, J., Foot, B., Kousha, O. & Blaikie, A., 30 Apr 2019, In : Eye.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Incidence of idiopathic intracranial hypertension in Fife

    Goudie, C., Burr, J. & Blaikie, A., 5 Nov 2018, In : Scottish Medical Journal. OnlineFirst

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Insightful Practice: a robust measure of medical students' professional response to feedback on their performance

    Murphy, D., Aitchison, P., Hernandez Santiago, V., Davey, P., Mires, G. & Nathwani, D., 1 Aug 2015, In : BMC Medical Education. 15, 11 p., 125.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. National survey of clinical communication assessment in medical education in the United Kingdom (UK)

    Laidlaw, A. H., Salisbury, H., Doherty, E. M. & Wiskin, C., 13 Jan 2014, In : BMC Medical Education. 14, 10.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. How do United Kingdom (UK) medical schools identify and support undergraduate medical students who ‘fail’ communication assessments? A national survey

    Wiskin, C., Doherty, E., von Fragstein, M., Laidlaw, A. H. & Salisbury, H., 8 Jul 2013, In : BMC Medical Education. 13, 95.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 259159349

Top