Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Does marine planning enable progress towards adaptive governance of marine systems? Lessons from Scotland’s regional marine planning process

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Does marine planning enable progress towards adaptive governance of marine systems? Lessons from Scotland’s regional marine planning process. / Greenhill, L; Stojanovic, Tim; Tett, P.

In: Maritime Studies, Vol. First Online, 24.03.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Greenhill, L, Stojanovic, T & Tett, P 2020, 'Does marine planning enable progress towards adaptive governance of marine systems? Lessons from Scotland’s regional marine planning process', Maritime Studies, vol. First Online. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-020-00171-5

APA

Greenhill, L., Stojanovic, T., & Tett, P. (2020). Does marine planning enable progress towards adaptive governance of marine systems? Lessons from Scotland’s regional marine planning process. Maritime Studies, First Online. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-020-00171-5

Vancouver

Greenhill L, Stojanovic T, Tett P. Does marine planning enable progress towards adaptive governance of marine systems? Lessons from Scotland’s regional marine planning process. Maritime Studies. 2020 Mar 24;First Online. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-020-00171-5

Author

Greenhill, L ; Stojanovic, Tim ; Tett, P. / Does marine planning enable progress towards adaptive governance of marine systems? Lessons from Scotland’s regional marine planning process. In: Maritime Studies. 2020 ; Vol. First Online.

Bibtex - Download

@article{2e122f07e05f46b1aab9d983e9e4fd53,
title = "Does marine planning enable progress towards adaptive governance of marine systems? Lessons from Scotland{\textquoteright}s regional marine planning process",
abstract = "This paper examines marine planning in Scotland and the extent to which it constrains or enables change towards adaptive governance. An in-depth case study of the partnership-based regional marine planning process is presented, based on interviews and documentary analysis. Drawing on adaptive governance theory, analysis focussed on key themes of: (1) local governance and integration across scales; (2) participation and collaboration; (3) learning, innovation and adaptability; and (4) self-organisation. Results present regional marine planning as an interface between hierarchical and collaborative governance based on empowerment of regional actors, and an attempt to enable co-existence of {\textquoteleft}top-down{\textquoteright} arrangements with experimentation at smaller scales. In this system, national government provides legal legitimacy, economic incentives and policy oversight; while the partnerships support collaboration and innovation at the regional level, based on strong leadership and participation. Contrasting experience of partnership-working is evident between the large and complex region of the Clyde and the island region of Shetland, where devolved powers and a more cohesive and community-based stakeholder group better facilitate adaptive governance. Overall findings of the study show the tensions of institutionalising adaptive governance and provide insights into how marine planning contributes to governance of marine systems. Firstly, vertical integration between central and decentralised authority in multi-level marine planning arrangements is challenged by an unclear balance of power and accountability between national government and regional marine planning partnerships. Secondly, the interaction between marine planning and existing policy, planning and management emerged as critical, because marine plans may only operate as an instrument to {\textquoteleft}guide{\textquoteright} management and prevailing, limited adaptive capacity in broader management structures constrains adaptive outcomes. Lastly, adaptive governance requires incremental and rapid response to change, but limited financial and technical resources constrain the depth and scale of reflection and ability to act. Understanding the contribution of marine planning requires clarification of the interaction between marine planning and other management (the extent to which it can influence decision-making in other domains) and, in addressing governance deficiencies, attention is also required on the adaptive capacity of existing and emerging legislative frameworks which govern decision-making and management of activities at sea.",
keywords = "Regional marine planning, Local governance, Marine spatial planning, Adaptive governance",
author = "L Greenhill and Tim Stojanovic and P Tett",
note = "Paul Tett was partly funded by H2020 project no. 774426, {\textquoteleft}The Blue Growth Farm{\textquoteright}.",
year = "2020",
month = mar,
day = "24",
doi = "10.1007/s40152-020-00171-5",
language = "English",
volume = "First Online",
journal = "Maritime Studies",
issn = "2212-9790",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does marine planning enable progress towards adaptive governance of marine systems? Lessons from Scotland’s regional marine planning process

AU - Greenhill, L

AU - Stojanovic, Tim

AU - Tett, P

N1 - Paul Tett was partly funded by H2020 project no. 774426, ‘The Blue Growth Farm’.

PY - 2020/3/24

Y1 - 2020/3/24

N2 - This paper examines marine planning in Scotland and the extent to which it constrains or enables change towards adaptive governance. An in-depth case study of the partnership-based regional marine planning process is presented, based on interviews and documentary analysis. Drawing on adaptive governance theory, analysis focussed on key themes of: (1) local governance and integration across scales; (2) participation and collaboration; (3) learning, innovation and adaptability; and (4) self-organisation. Results present regional marine planning as an interface between hierarchical and collaborative governance based on empowerment of regional actors, and an attempt to enable co-existence of ‘top-down’ arrangements with experimentation at smaller scales. In this system, national government provides legal legitimacy, economic incentives and policy oversight; while the partnerships support collaboration and innovation at the regional level, based on strong leadership and participation. Contrasting experience of partnership-working is evident between the large and complex region of the Clyde and the island region of Shetland, where devolved powers and a more cohesive and community-based stakeholder group better facilitate adaptive governance. Overall findings of the study show the tensions of institutionalising adaptive governance and provide insights into how marine planning contributes to governance of marine systems. Firstly, vertical integration between central and decentralised authority in multi-level marine planning arrangements is challenged by an unclear balance of power and accountability between national government and regional marine planning partnerships. Secondly, the interaction between marine planning and existing policy, planning and management emerged as critical, because marine plans may only operate as an instrument to ‘guide’ management and prevailing, limited adaptive capacity in broader management structures constrains adaptive outcomes. Lastly, adaptive governance requires incremental and rapid response to change, but limited financial and technical resources constrain the depth and scale of reflection and ability to act. Understanding the contribution of marine planning requires clarification of the interaction between marine planning and other management (the extent to which it can influence decision-making in other domains) and, in addressing governance deficiencies, attention is also required on the adaptive capacity of existing and emerging legislative frameworks which govern decision-making and management of activities at sea.

AB - This paper examines marine planning in Scotland and the extent to which it constrains or enables change towards adaptive governance. An in-depth case study of the partnership-based regional marine planning process is presented, based on interviews and documentary analysis. Drawing on adaptive governance theory, analysis focussed on key themes of: (1) local governance and integration across scales; (2) participation and collaboration; (3) learning, innovation and adaptability; and (4) self-organisation. Results present regional marine planning as an interface between hierarchical and collaborative governance based on empowerment of regional actors, and an attempt to enable co-existence of ‘top-down’ arrangements with experimentation at smaller scales. In this system, national government provides legal legitimacy, economic incentives and policy oversight; while the partnerships support collaboration and innovation at the regional level, based on strong leadership and participation. Contrasting experience of partnership-working is evident between the large and complex region of the Clyde and the island region of Shetland, where devolved powers and a more cohesive and community-based stakeholder group better facilitate adaptive governance. Overall findings of the study show the tensions of institutionalising adaptive governance and provide insights into how marine planning contributes to governance of marine systems. Firstly, vertical integration between central and decentralised authority in multi-level marine planning arrangements is challenged by an unclear balance of power and accountability between national government and regional marine planning partnerships. Secondly, the interaction between marine planning and existing policy, planning and management emerged as critical, because marine plans may only operate as an instrument to ‘guide’ management and prevailing, limited adaptive capacity in broader management structures constrains adaptive outcomes. Lastly, adaptive governance requires incremental and rapid response to change, but limited financial and technical resources constrain the depth and scale of reflection and ability to act. Understanding the contribution of marine planning requires clarification of the interaction between marine planning and other management (the extent to which it can influence decision-making in other domains) and, in addressing governance deficiencies, attention is also required on the adaptive capacity of existing and emerging legislative frameworks which govern decision-making and management of activities at sea.

KW - Regional marine planning

KW - Local governance

KW - Marine spatial planning

KW - Adaptive governance

U2 - 10.1007/s40152-020-00171-5

DO - 10.1007/s40152-020-00171-5

M3 - Article

VL - First Online

JO - Maritime Studies

JF - Maritime Studies

SN - 2212-9790

ER -

Related by author

  1. Fringe of Gold: Oceans from the perspective of our coast

    Williams, B., Bates, C. R., Searle, O., Stojanovic, T. & South, A. M., 10 Nov 2020

    Research output: Non-textual formDigital or Visual Products

  2. Governance as a framework to theorise and evaluate marine planning

    Stojanovic, T. & Gee, K., Oct 2020, In: Marine Policy. 120, 104115.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Multilevel governance of coastal flood risk reduction: a public finance perspective

    Bisaro, A., de Bel, M., Hinkel, J., Kok, S., Stojanovic, T. & Ware, D., Oct 2020, In: Environmental Science and Policy. 112, p. 203-212

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Public preferences for multiple dimensions of bird biodiversity at the coast: insights for the cultural ecosystem services framework

    Boeri, M., Stojanovic, T. A., Wright, L. J., Burton, N. H. K., Hockley, N. & Bradbury, R. B., 7 Jan 2020, In: Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. In press, 106571.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  5. Socio-cultural dimensions of marine spatial planning

    McKinley, E., Acott, T. & Stojanovic, T., 24 Jan 2019, Maritime spatial planning: past, present, future. Zaucha, J. & Gee, K. (eds.). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 151-174 24 p.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

ID: 266954189

Top