Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Double-observer line transect methods: levels of independence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DOI

Open Access permissions

Open

Abstract

Double-observer line transect methods are becoming increasingly widespread, especially for the estimation of marine mammal abundance from aerial and shipboard surveys when detection of animals on the line is uncertain. The resulting data supplement conventional distance sampling data with two-sample mark–recapture data. Like conventional mark–recapture data, these have inherent problems for estimating abundance in the presence of heterogeneity. Unlike conventional mark–recapture methods, line transect methods use knowledge of the distribution of a covariate, which affects detection probability (namely, distance from the transect line) in inference. This knowledge can be used to diagnose unmodeled heterogeneity in the mark–recapture component of the data. By modeling the covariance in detection probabilities with distance, we show how the estimation problem can be formulated in terms of different levels of independence. At one extreme, full independence is assumed, as in the Petersen estimator (which does not use distance data); at the other extreme, independence only occurs in the limit as detection probability tends to one. Between the two extremes, there is a range of models, including those currently in common use, which have intermediate levels of independence. We show how this framework can be used to provide more reliable analysis of double-observer line transect data. We test the methods by simulation, and by analysis of a dataset for which true abundance is known. We illustrate the approach through analysis of minke whale sightings data from the North Sea and adjacent waters.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)169-177
Number of pages9
JournalBiometrics
Volume66
Issue number1
Early online date7 May 2009
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010

    Research areas

  • Distance sampling, Double-observer methods, Full independence, Limiting independence, Line transect sampling, Point independence

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Model-based approaches to deal with detectability: a comment on Hutto (2016a)

    Marques, T. A., Thomas, L., Kery, M., Buckland, S. T., Borchers, D. L., Rexstad, E., Fewster, R. M., Mackenzie, D. I., Royle, J. A., Guillera-Arroita, G., Handel, C. M., Pavlacky, D. C. & Camp, R. J. Jul 2017 In : Ecological Applications. 27, 5, p. 1694-1698 5 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

  2. Distance Sampling

    Marques, T. A., Buckland, S. T., Borchers, D. L., Rexstad, E. & Thomas, L. 1 Dec 2014 International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science. Lovric, M. (ed.). Springer, p. 398 400 p.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

  3. Modelling population dynamics: Model formulation, fitting and assessment using state-space methods

    Newman, K., Buckland, S. T., Morgan, B., King, R., Borchers, D. L., Cole, D., Besbeas, P., Gimenez, O. & Thomas, L. 2014 New York: Springer. 215 p. (Methods in Statistical Ecology)

    Research output: Book/ReportBook

Related by journal

  1. Open population maximum likelihood spatial capture-recapture

    Glennie, R., Borchers, D. L., Murchie, M., Harmsen, B. & Foster, R. 4 Sep 2017 In : Biometrics. 9 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Distance sampling detection functions: 2D or not 2D?

    Borchers, D. L. & Cox, M. J. 15 Jun 2017 In : Biometrics. 73, 2, p. 593-602 10 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Double-observer line transect surveys with Markov-modulated Poisson process models for overdispersed animal availability

    Borchers, D. L. & Langrock, R. Dec 2015 In : Biometrics. 71, 4, p. 1060-1069 10 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Nonparametric inference in hidden Markov models using P-splines

    Langrock, R., Kneib, T., Sohn, A. & De Ruiter, S. L. 2015 In : Biometrics. 71, 2, p. 520-528

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Maximum likelihood estimation for model M for capture-recapture data with misidentification

    Vale, R. T. R., Fewster, R. M., Carroll, E. L. & Patenaude, N. J. 1 Jan 2014 In : Biometrics.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Biometrics (Journal)

    Buckland, S. T. (Editor)
    20052011

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial workEditor of research journal

  2. Biometrics (Journal)

    Borchers, D. L. (Editor)
    2001 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial workEditor of research journal

ID: 401968