Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Drivers of the opioid crisis: An appraisal of financial conflicts of interest in clinical practice guideline panels at the peak of opioid prescribing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Sheryl Spithoff, Pamela Leece, Frank Sullivan, Nav Persaud, Peter Belesiotis, Liane Steiner

School/Research organisations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Starting in the late 1990s, the pharmaceutical industry sought to increase prescribing of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain. Influencing the content of clinical practice guidelines may have been one strategy industry employed. In this study we assessed potential risk of bias from financial conflicts of interest with the pharmaceutical industry in guidelines for opioid prescribing for chronic non-cancer pain published between 2007 and 2013, the peak of opioid prescribing.

METHODS: We used the Guideline Panel Review (GPR) to appraise the guidelines included in the 2014 systematic review and critical appraisal by Nuckols et al. These were English language opioid prescribing guidelines for adults with chronic non-cancer pain published between July 2007 and July 2013, the peak of opioid prescribing. The GPR assigns red flags to items known to introduce potential bias from financial conflicts of interest. We operationalized the GPR by creating specific definitions for each red flag. Two reviewers independently evaluated each guideline. Disagreements were resolved with discussion. We also compared our score to the critical appraisal scores for overall quality from the study by Nuckols et al.

RESULTS: We appraised 13 guidelines, which received 43 red flags in total. Guidelines had 3.3 red flags on average (out of a possible seven) with range from one to six. Four guidelines had missing information, so red flags may be higher than reported. The guidelines with the highest and second highest scores for overall quality in the 2014 critical appraisal by Nuckols et al. had five and three red flags, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Our findings reveal that the guidelines for opioid prescribing chronic non-cancer pain from 2007 to 2013 were at risk of bias because of pervasive conflicts of interest with the pharmaceutical industry and a paucity of mechanisms to address bias. Even highly-rated guidelines examined in a 2014 systematic review and critical appraisal had many red flags.

Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0227045
Number of pages15
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jan 2020

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Trial Forge Guidance 2: how to decide if a further Study Within A Trial (SWAT) is needed

    Treweek, S., Bevan, S., Bower, P., Briel, M., Campbell, M., Christie, J., Collett, C., Cotton, S., Devane, D., El Feky, A., Galvin, S., Gardner, H., Gillies, K., Hood, K., Jansen, J., Littleford, R., Parker, A., Ramsay, C., Restrup, L., Sullivan, F. & 7 others, Torgerson, D., Tremain, L., von Elm, E., Westmore, M., Williams, H., Williamson, P. R. & Clarke, M., 7 Jan 2020, In : Trials. 21, 9 p., 33.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Choosing Wisely Canada campaign associated with less overuse of thyroid testing: retrospective parallel cohort study

    Wintemute, K., Greiver, M., McIsaac, W., Del Giudice, M. E., Sullivan, F., Aliarzadeh, B., Kalia, S., Meaney, C., Moineddin, R. & Singer, A., 13 Nov 2019, In : Canadian Family Physician. 65, 11, p. e487-e496

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. The "All of Us" Research Program

    Sullivan, F., McKinstry, B. & Vasishta, S., 7 Nov 2019, In : New England Journal of Medicine. 381, 19, p. 1883-1885 3 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

  4. Opioid agonist therapy during residential treatment of opioid use disorder: cohort study on access and outcomes

    Spithoff, S., Meaney, C., Urbanoski, K., Harrington, K., Que, B., Kahan, M., Leece, P., Shehadeh, V. & Sullivan, F., 11 Oct 2019, In : Canadian Family Physician. 65, 10, p. e443-e452 10 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Effect on treatment adherence of distributing essential medicines at no charge: the CLEAN Meds randomized clinical trial

    Persaud, N., Bedard, M., Boozary, A. S., Glazier, R. H., Gomes, T., Hwang, S. W., Jüni, P., Law, M. R., Mamdani, M. M., Manns, B. J., Martin, D., Morgan, S. G., Oh, P. I., Pinto, A. D., Shah, B. R., Sullivan, F., Umali, N., Thorpe, K. E., Tu, K., Laupacis, A. & 1 others, for the Carefully Selected and Easily Accessible at No Charge Medicines (CLEAN Meds) Study Team, 7 Oct 2019, In : JAMA Internal Medicine. Online First

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. The shield of self-compassion: a buffer against disordered eating risk from physical appearance perfectionism

    Bergunde, L. & Dritschel, B., 13 Jan 2020, In : PLoS ONE. 15, 1, 17 p., e0227564.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Agreement between primary care and hospital diagnosis of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a cross-sectional, observational study using record linkage

    O’Neill, B., Kalia, S., Aliarzadeh, B., Moineddin, R., Fung, W. L. A., Sullivan, F., Maloul, A., Bernard, S. & Greiver, M., 7 Jan 2019, In : PLoS ONE. 14, 1, 15 p., e0210214.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Animal behaviour in a human world: a crowdsourcing study on horses that open door and gate mechanisms

    Krueger, K., Esch, L. & Byrne, R., 26 Jun 2019, In : PLoS ONE. 14, 6, 20 p., e0218954.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Correlates of social role and conflict severity in wild vervet monkey agonistic screams

    Mercier, S., Déaux, E. C., van de Waal, E., Bono, A. E. J. & Zuberbuhler, K., 1 May 2019, In : PLoS One. 14, 5, 20 p., e0214640.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. PLoS ONE (Journal)

    Joanna Louise Kershaw (Member of editorial board)
    18 Mar 2019

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesPeer review of manuscripts

  2. PLoS ONE (Journal)

    Catharine Penelope Cross (Member of editorial board)
    1 Sep 2018 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  3. PLoS ONE (Journal)

    Will Cresswell (Reviewer)
    23 May 2018

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesPeer review of manuscripts

  4. PLoS ONE (Journal)

    Barbara Dritschel (Member of editorial board)
    May 2018 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  5. PLoS ONE (Journal)

    Simon Young (Reviewer)
    7 Jun 201719 Jun 2017

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesPeer review of manuscripts

ID: 266011592

Top