Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Drivers of the opioid crisis: An appraisal of financial conflicts of interest in clinical practice guideline panels at the peak of opioid prescribing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Author(s)

Sheryl Spithoff, Pamela Leece, Frank Sullivan, Nav Persaud, Peter Belesiotis, Liane Steiner

School/Research organisations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Starting in the late 1990s, the pharmaceutical industry sought to increase prescribing of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain. Influencing the content of clinical practice guidelines may have been one strategy industry employed. In this study we assessed potential risk of bias from financial conflicts of interest with the pharmaceutical industry in guidelines for opioid prescribing for chronic non-cancer pain published between 2007 and 2013, the peak of opioid prescribing.

METHODS: We used the Guideline Panel Review (GPR) to appraise the guidelines included in the 2014 systematic review and critical appraisal by Nuckols et al. These were English language opioid prescribing guidelines for adults with chronic non-cancer pain published between July 2007 and July 2013, the peak of opioid prescribing. The GPR assigns red flags to items known to introduce potential bias from financial conflicts of interest. We operationalized the GPR by creating specific definitions for each red flag. Two reviewers independently evaluated each guideline. Disagreements were resolved with discussion. We also compared our score to the critical appraisal scores for overall quality from the study by Nuckols et al.

RESULTS: We appraised 13 guidelines, which received 43 red flags in total. Guidelines had 3.3 red flags on average (out of a possible seven) with range from one to six. Four guidelines had missing information, so red flags may be higher than reported. The guidelines with the highest and second highest scores for overall quality in the 2014 critical appraisal by Nuckols et al. had five and three red flags, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Our findings reveal that the guidelines for opioid prescribing chronic non-cancer pain from 2007 to 2013 were at risk of bias because of pervasive conflicts of interest with the pharmaceutical industry and a paucity of mechanisms to address bias. Even highly-rated guidelines examined in a 2014 systematic review and critical appraisal had many red flags.

Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0227045
Number of pages15
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jan 2020

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Earlier diagnosis of lung cancer in a randomised trial of an autoantibody blood test followed by imaging

    Sullivan, F. M., Mair, F. S., Anderson, W., Armory, P., Briggs, A., Chew, C., Dorward, A., Haughney, J., Hogarth, F., Kendrick, D., Littleford, R., Mcconnachie, A., McCowan, C., Mcmeekin, N., Patel, M., Rauchhaus, P., Ritchie, L., Robertson, C., Robertson, J., Robles-Zurita, J. & 8 others, Sarvesvaran, J., Sewell, H., Sproule, M., Taylor, T., Tello, A., Treweek, S., Vedhara, K. & Schembri, S., 1 Jan 2021, In: European Respiratory Journal. 57, 1, 11 p., 2000670.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Early diagnosis of lung cancer in people most at risk

    Sullivan, F. & van Beusekom, M. M., Dec 2020, In: British Journal of General Practice. 70, 701, p. 572-573 2 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

  3. The effect of air-pollution and weather exposure on mortality and hospital admission and implications for further research: a systematic scoping review

    Abed Al Ahad, M., Sullivan, F., Demšar, U., Melhem, M., Kulu, H. & Lee, C. (ed.), 29 Oct 2020, In: PLoS ONE. 15, 10, 24 p., e0241415.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Ecosystem engineers drive differing microbial community composition in intertidal estuarine sediments

    Wyness, A. J., Fortune, I., Blight, A. J., Browne, P., Hartley, M., Holden, M. & Paterson, D. M., 19 Feb 2021, In: PLoS ONE. 16, 2, 20 p., e0240952.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Performance evaluation of survival regression models in analysing Swedish dental implant complication data with frailty

    Fagbamigbe, A. F., Karlsson, K., Derks, J. & Petzold, M., 7 Jan 2021, In: PLoS ONE. 16, 1, 16 p., e0245111.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Are in vitro and in silico approaches used appropriately for animal-based major depressive disorder research?

    Carvalho, C., Varela, S. A. M., Marques, T. A., Knight, A. & Vicente, L., 24 Jun 2020, In: PLoS ONE. 15, 6, 6 p., e0233954.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Artists on the edge of the world: an integrated approach to the study of Magdalenian engraved stone plaquettes from Jersey (Channel Islands)

    Bello, S. M., Blinkhorn, E., Needham, A., Bates, M., Duffy, S., Little, A., Pope, M., Scott, B., Shaw, A., Welch, M. D., Kinnaird, T., Millar, L., Robinson, R. & Conneller, C., 19 Aug 2020, In: PLoS ONE. 15, 8, 40 p., e0236875.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  5. Classification and characterisation of livestock production systems in northern Tanzania

    de Glanville, W. A., Davis, A., Allan, K. J., Buza, J., Claxton, J. R., Crump, J. A., Halliday, J. E. B., Johnson, P. C. D., Kibona, T. J., Mmbaga, B. T., Swai, E. S., Uzzell, C. B., Yoder, J., Sharp, J. & Cleaveland, S., 30 Dec 2020, In: PLoS ONE. 15, 12, 25 p., e0229478.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. PLoS ONE (Journal)

    Joanna Louise Kershaw (Reviewer)

    18 Mar 2019

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesPeer review of manuscripts

  2. PLoS One (Journal)

    Paula Jean Miles (Member of editorial board)

    2019

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesPeer review of manuscripts

  3. PLoS ONE (Journal)

    Catharine Penelope Cross (Member of editorial board)

    1 Sep 2018 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  4. PLoS ONE (Journal)

    Will Cresswell (Reviewer)

    23 May 2018

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesPeer review of manuscripts

  5. PLoS ONE (Journal)

    Barbara Dritschel (Member of editorial board)

    May 2018 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

ID: 266011592

Top