Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Epistemology and the law: why there is no epistemic mileage in legal cases

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Marvin Backes

School/Research organisations

Abstract

The primary aim of this paper is to defend the Lockean View—the view that a belief is epistemically justified iff it is highly probable—against a new family of objections. According to these objections, broadly speaking, the Lockean View ought to be abandoned because it is incompatible with, or difficult to square with, our judgments surrounding certain legal cases. I distinguish and explore three different versions of these objections—The Conviction Argument, the Argument from Assertion and Practical Reasoning, and the Comparative Probabilities Argument—but argue that none of them are successful. I also present some very general reasons for being pessimistic about the overall strategy of using legal considerations to evaluate epistemic theories; as we will see, there are good reasons to think that many of the considerations relevant to legal theorizing are ultimately irrelevant to epistemic theorizing.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages20
JournalPhilosophical Studies
VolumeFirst Online
Early online date5 Sep 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 5 Sep 2019

    Research areas

  • Statistical evidence, Standard of proof, Lockean View, Justification, Proof paradox

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by journal

  1. Conspiracy Theories, Impostor Syndrome, and Distrust

    Hawley, K. J., 2 Jan 2019, In : Philosophical Studies. First online, 12 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Aboutness in imagination

    Berto, F., Aug 2018, In : Philosophical Studies. 175, 8, p. 1871-1886 16 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Hasteners and delayers: why rains don't cause fires

    Touborg, C. T., Jul 2018, In : Philosophical Studies. 175, 7, p. 1557-1576

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Normalcy, justification, and the easy-defeat problem

    Backes, M., 20 Aug 2018, In : Philosophical Studies. First Online, 19 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 260820646

Top