Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Errors and Textual Problems in the Old English Martyrology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Ninth-century Old English prose texts were composed by authors not famed for their linguistic skills and experienced a relatively long transmission until the end of the Anglo-Saxon period; unsurprisingly, they present a considerable number of authorial and scribal errors in the copies in which they survive. But editors of Old English texts have tended to discuss authorial translation errors individually, in textual notes, and often apologetically. Similarly, scribal errors are rarely studied in context, usually edited out of the modern edited text and at best confined to a textual apparatus. This article charts errors made by the author of the Old English Martyrology, who struggled to control his very considerable encyclopaedic knowledge in language often not conducive to accurate transmission; scribal errors arising from this language are also analysed. The authorial and scribal errors apparent particularly in the eleventh-century copies of this text point to a very difficult reading experience faced by readers in the late Anglo-Saxon period.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)147-64
JournalNeophilologus
Volume97
Issue number1
Early online date16 Feb 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Review of R. Pinner, The Cult of St Edmund in Medieval East Anglia

    Rauer, C., 2018, Speculum. Vol. 93. p. 561-3

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingOther contribution

  2. Early Mercian text production: authors, dialects, and reputations

    Rauer, C., Oct 2017, In : Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik. 77, 3-4, p. 541-558

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Mann and gender in Old English prose: a pilot study

    Rauer, C., Jan 2017, In : Neophilologus. 101, 1, p. 139-158

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Anglo-Saxon Hagiography

    Rauer, C., 2017, Oxford Bibliographies in British and Irish Literature. Hadfield, A. (ed.). New York: Oxford University Press

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingOther contribution

  5. Review of K. Karasawa, ed., The Old English Metrial Calendar (Menologium)

    Rauer, C., 2016, In : Anglia: Journal of English Philology. 134, p. 322-4

    Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article review

Related by journal

  1. Mann and gender in Old English prose: a pilot study

    Rauer, C., Jan 2017, In : Neophilologus. 101, 1, p. 139-158

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Where are the vrais dévots and are they véritables gens de bien? Eloquent slippage in the Tartuffe controversy

    Prest, J. T., Apr 2013, In : Neophilologus. 97, 2, p. 283-297 15 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Qui est le contemporain? Jean Ristat

    Bowd, G. P., Oct 2004, In : Neophilologus. 88, 4, p. 521-532 11 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Sexing the Manuscript: the case for female ownership of MS Chetham 8009

    Purdie, R., Jan 1998, In : Neophilologus. 82, 1, p. 139-148 10 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 5376214

Top