Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Estimating animal population density using passive acoustics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

DOI

Open Access permissions

Open

Abstract

Reliable estimation of the size or density of wild animal populations is very important for effective wildlife management, conservation and ecology. Currently, the most widely used methods for obtaining such estimates involve either sighting animals from transect lines or some form of capture-recapture on marked or uniquely identifiable individuals. However, many species are difficult to sight, and cannot be easily marked or recaptured. Some of these species produce readily identifiable sounds, providing an opportunity to use passive acoustic data to estimate animal density. In addition, even for species for which other visually based methods are feasible, passive acoustic methods offer the potential for greater detection ranges in some environments (e.g. underwater or in dense forest), and hence potentially better precision. Automated data collection means that surveys can take place at times and in places where it would be too expensive or dangerous to send human observers.

Here, we present an overview of animal density estimation using passive acoustic data, a relatively new and fast-developing field. We review the types of data and methodological approaches currently available to researchers and we provide a framework for acoustics-based density estimation, illustrated with examples from real-world case studies. We mention moving sensor platforms (e.g. towed acoustics), but then focus on methods involving sensors at fixed locations, particularly hydrophones to survey marine mammals, as acoustic-based density estimation research to date has been concentrated in this area. Primary among these are methods based on distance sampling and spatially explicit capture-recapture. The methods are also applicable to other aquatic and terrestrial sound-producing taxa.

We conclude that, despite being in its infancy, density estimation based on passive acoustic data likely will become an important method for surveying a number of diverse taxa, such as sea mammals, fish, birds, amphibians, and insects, especially in situations where inferences are required over long periods of time. There is considerable work ahead, with several potentially fruitful research areas, including the development of (i) hardware and software for data acquisition, (ii) efficient, calibrated, automated detection and classification systems, and (iii) statistical approaches optimized for this application. Further, survey design will need to be developed, and research is needed on the acoustic behaviour of target species. Fundamental research on vocalization rates and group sizes, and the relation between these and other factors such as season or behaviour state, is critical. Evaluation of the methods under known density scenarios will be important for empirically validating the approaches presented here
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)287–309
JournalBiological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
Volume88
Issue number2
Early online date29 Nov 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2013

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Spatio-temporal variation in click production rates of beaked whales: implications for passive acoustic density estimation

    Warren, V. E., Marques, T. A., Harris, D., Thomas, L., Tyack, P. L., Aguilar de Soto, N., Hickmott, L. S. & Johnson, M. P., Mar 2017, In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 141, 3, p. 1962-1974 13 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. A comparison of three methods for estimating call densities of migrating bowhead whales using passive acoustic monitoring

    Oedekoven, C. S., Marques, T. A., Harris, D., Thomas, L., Thode, A. M., Blackwell, S. B., Conrad, A. S. & Kim, K. H., 15 Jun 2021, In: Environmental and Ecological Statistics. 25 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Roaring and repetition: how bowhead whales adjust their call density and source level (Lombard effect) in the presence of natural and seismic airgun survey noise

    Thode, A. M., Blackwell, S. B., Conrad, A. S., Kim, K. H., Marques, T., Thomas, L., Oedekoven, C. S., Harris, D. & Broker, K., 31 Mar 2020, In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 147, 3, p. 2061-2080 20 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. From physiology to policy: a review of physiological noise effects on marine fauna with implications for mitigation

    Aguilar De Soto, N., Gkikopoulou, K., Hooker, S., Isojunno, S., Johnson, M., Miller, P., Tyack, P., Wensveen, P., Donovan, C., Harris, C. M., Harris, D., Marshall, L., Oedekoven, C., Prieto, R. & Thomas, L., Dec 2016, In: Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics. 27, 1, 14 p., 040008.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

  5. Delphinid echolocation click detection probability on near-seafloor sensors

    Frasier, K. E., Wiggins, S. M., Harris, D., Marques, T. A., Thomas, L. & Hildebrand, J. A., Sep 2016, In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 140, 3, p. 1918-1930 13 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. A pan-metazoan concept for adult stem cells: the wobbling Penrose landscape

    Rinkevich, B., Ballarin, L., Martinez, P., Somorjai, I. M. L., Ben-Hamo, O., Borisenko, I., Berezikov, E., Ereskovsky, A., Gazave, E., Khnykin, D., Manni, L., Petukhova, O., Rosner, A., Röttinger, E., Spagnuolo, A., Sugni, M., Tiozzo, S. & Hobmayer, B., 6 Oct 2021, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Biological Reviews. Early View, 27 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

  2. From theory to practice in pattern-oriented modelling: identifying and using empirical patterns in predictive models

    Gallagher, C. A., Chudzinska, M., Larsen-Gray, A., Pollock, C. J., Sells, S. N., White, P. J. C. & Berger, U., 12 May 2021, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Biological Reviews. Early View, 21 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Camouflage in predators

    Pembury Smith, M. & Ruxton, G. D., Oct 2020, In: Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 95, 5, p. 1325-1340 16 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

  4. A way forward with eco evo devo: an extended theory of resource polymorphism with postglacial fishes as model systems

    Skúlason, S., Parsons, K. J., Svanbäck, R., Räsänen, K., Ferguson, M. M., Adams, C. E., Amundsen, P-A., Bartels, P., Bean, C. W., Boughman, J. W., Englund, G., Guðbrandsson, J., Hooker, O. E., Hudson, A. G., Kahilainen, K. K., Knudsen, R., Kristjánsson, B. K., Leblanc, C. A-L., Jónsson, Z., Öhlund, G. & 2 others, Smith, C. & Snorrason, S. S., Oct 2019, In: Biological Reviews. 94, 5, p. 1786-1808 23 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  5. Secondary dispersal mechanisms of winged seeds: a review

    der Weduwen, D. & Ruxton, G. D., Oct 2019, In: Biological Reviews. 94, 5, p. 1830-1838 9 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

ID: 26522676

Top