Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Estimating pollinator performance of visitors to the self-incompatible crop-plant Brassica rapa by single visit deposition and pollen germination: a comparison of methods

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Robert Brian Patchett, Gavin Andrew Ballantyne, Patricia Gillian Willmer

School/Research organisations


Estimating the pollen-deposition effectiveness of flower visitors is fundamental to understanding their performance as pollinators. While estimates of visitation rates, pollen loads, and single visit deposition (SVD) are all useful proxies for performance, and so help to reveal the relative effectiveness of different visitors, none take into account the breeding system of the plants, or the quality of pollen deposited. Here we compare the performance of visitors to the self-incompatible plant Brassica rapa (turnip) using SVD and pollen germination. We also report the first use of the staining of Brassica rapa stigma papilla cells (known to reveal a specific reaction to self-pollen) to compare self-pollen deposition between insect visitors. We found that most of the pollen grains deposited by insect visitors (and therefore counted by SVD methods) were non-germinating self-pollen. A smaller proportion of grains were outcrossed and so germinated. There was also a significant positive relationship between environmental conditions (wind speed) and pollen deposition, but not pollen germination.
Both methods identified Bombus spp. as the best-performing visitors on turnip flowers, followed by Eristalis spp., whereas performance estimates for Episyrphus balteatus and ‘other hoverflies’ were no higher than controls for both methods. This study provides further insight into the methodology for estimating pollinator performance, especially in plants when only cross-pollen can germinate.


Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)78-85
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Pollination Ecology
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2017

    Research areas

  • Pollination, Pollinator effectiveness, Pollen deposition, Pollen germination, Brassicaceae

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. A dual function for 4-methoxybenzaldehyde in Petasites fragrans? Pollinator-attractant and ant-repellent

    Pattrick, J. G., Shepherd, T., Hoppitt, W., Plowman, N. S. & Willmer, P., Oct 2017, In: Arthropod-Plant Interactions. 11, 5, p. 623-627 5 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Pollinator importance networks illustrate the crucial value of bees in a highly speciose plant community

    Ballantyne, G., Baldock, K. C. R., Rendell, L. & Willmer, P. G., 21 Aug 2017, In: Scientific Reports. 7, 13 p., 8389.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Insights from measuring pollen deposition: quantifying the pre-eminence of bees as flower visitors and effective pollinators

    Willmer, P. G., Cunnold, H. E. & Ballantyne, G. A., Jun 2017, In: Arthropod-Plant Interactions. 11, 3, p. 411-425 15 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Constructing more informative plant-pollinator networks: visitation and pollen deposition networks in a heathland plant community

    Ballantyne, G. A., Baldock, K. C. R. & Willmer, P. G., 2 Sep 2015, In: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 282, 9 p., 20151130.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  5. Too many commercial hives

    Willmer, P. G., 21 May 2015, In: Nature. 521, 7552, p. S57-S59

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Related by journal

  1. Big bees do a better job: intraspecific size variation influences pollination effectiveness

    Willmer, P. G. & Finlayson, K., Sep 2014, In: Journal of Pollination Ecology. 14, 23, p. 244-254 11 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 251414004