Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Estimation bias under model selection for distance sampling detection functions

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

DOI

Open Access permissions

Open

Abstract

Many simulation studies have examined the properties of distance sampling estimators of wildlife population size. When assumptions hold, if distances are generated from a detection model and fitted using the same model, they are known to perform well. However, in practice, the true model is unknown. Therefore, standard practice includes model selection, typically using model comparison tools like Akaike Information Criterion. Here we examine the performance of standard distance sampling estimators under model selection. We compare line and point transect estimators with distances simulated from two detection functions, hazard-rate and exponential power series (EPS), over a range of sample sizes. To mimic the real-world context where the true model may not be part of the candidate set, EPS models were not included as candidates, except for the half-normal parameterization. We found median bias depended on sample size (being asymptotically unbiased) and on the form of the true detection function: negative bias (up to 15% for line transects and 30% for point transects) when the shoulder of maximum detectability was narrow, and positive bias (up to 10% for line transects and 15% for point transects) when it was wide. Generating unbiased simulations requires careful choice of detection function or very large datasets. Practitioners should collect data that result in detection functions with a shoulder similar to a half-normal and use the monotonicity constraint. Narrow-shouldered detection functions can be avoided through good field procedures and those with wide shoulder are unlikely to occur, due to heterogeneity in detectability.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)399-414
Number of pages16
JournalEnvironmental and Ecological Statistics
Volume24
Issue number3
Early online date26 May 2017
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2017

    Research areas

  • Detection models, Line transect, Model selection, Point transect, Wildlife abundance estimation

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Evaluating the effect of measurement error in pairs of 3D bearings in point transect sampling estimates of density

    Marques, T. A., Duarte, P., Peixe, T., Moretti, D. & Thomas, L. 27 Mar 2018 University of St Andrews. 72 p. (CREEM Technical Report; no. 2018-1)

    Research output: ResearchOther report

  2. Comparing methods suitable for monitoring marine mammals in low visibility conditions during seismic surveys

    Verfuss, U. K., Gillespie, D., Gordon, J., Marques, T. A., Miller, B., Plunkett, R., Theriault, J. A., Tollit, D. J., Zitterbart, D. P., Hubert, P. & Thomas, L. Jan 2018 In : Marine Pollution Bulletin. 126, p. 1-18 18 p.

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewReview article

  3. Model-based approaches to deal with detectability: a comment on Hutto (2016a)

    Marques, T. A., Thomas, L., Kery, M., Buckland, S. T., Borchers, D. L., Rexstad, E., Fewster, R. M., Mackenzie, D. I., Royle, J. A., Guillera-Arroita, G., Handel, C. M., Pavlacky, D. C. & Camp, R. J. Jul 2017 In : Ecological Applications. 27, 5, p. 1694-1698 5 p.

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewLetter

  4. Delphinid echolocation click detection probability on near-seafloor sensors

    Frasier, K. E., Wiggins, S. M., Harris, D., Marques, T. A., Thomas, L. & Hildebrand, J. A. Sep 2016 In : Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 140, 3, p. 1918-1930 13 p.

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Related by journal

  1. Imperfect observations in ecological studies

    Shimadzu, H., Foster, S. D. & Darnell, R. Sep 2016 In : Environmental and Ecological Statistics. 23, 3, p. 337-358 22 p.

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

  2. Distance sampling with a random scale detection function

    Oedekoven, C. S., Laake, J. L. & Skaug, H. J. Dec 2015 In : Environmental and Ecological Statistics. 22, 4, p. 725-737

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

  3. Finite area smoothing with generalized distance splines

    Miller, D. L. & Wood, S. N. 2014 In : Environmental and Ecological Statistics. 21, 4, p. 715-731 17 p.

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

  4. A family of spatial biodiversity measures based on graphs

    Rajala, T. & Illian, J. B. Dec 2012 In : Environmental and Ecological Statistics. 19, 4, p. 545-572 28 p.

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Related by journal

  1. Environmental and Ecological Statistics (Journal)

    Buckland, S. T. (Member of editorial board)
    20042008

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial workEditor of research journal

ID: 249973541