Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Flexigemony and force in China's resource diplomacy in Africa: Sudan and Zambia compared

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Pádraig Carmody, Ian Taylor

School/Research organisations

Abstract

The Chinese government and its companies have dramatically increased their presence in Africa in the last decade. There has been much media interest and commentary on the impacts of this engagement on governance in Africa, as it is often seen to be strengthening authoritarian states, such Sudan and Zimbabwe.1 However, Chinese actors are also engaging with more democratic states and spaces, such as Zambia. This article seeks to explore the impacts of increased Chinese engagement with Africa on governance through a comparative case study of two contrasting cases: Sudan and Zambia, using the concept of flexigemony. Contrary to popular perception, behaviour by Chinese actors has sometimes been a moderating force in Sudan, while provoking violence in Zambia.

Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)496-515
Number of pages20
JournalGeopolitics
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Sep 2010

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by journal

  1. Familial geopolitics and ontological security: intergenerational relations, migration and minority youth (in)securities in Scotland

    Botterill, K., Hopkins, P. & Sanghera, G., 15 Oct 2018, In : Geopolitics. Latest Articles, 26 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Spheres of influence as negotiated hegemony – the case of Central Asia

    Costa Buranelli, F., 2 Aug 2018, In : Geopolitics. 23, 2, p. 378-403

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Indigestible geopolitics: The many readings of the digest

    Sharp, J., 2003, In : Geopolitics. 8, 2

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. A polish bridge?

    Dawson, A. H., 2001, In : Geopolitics. 6, 1, p. 91-106

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 266132968

Top