Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Genuine savings as a test of New Zealand weak sustainability

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Mubashir Qasim, Les Oxley, Eoin McLaughlin

School/Research organisations

Abstract

The key aims of this paper are to: (1) to extend the World Bank’s (WB) measure of genuine savings (GS) for New Zealand by using a longer time series of data, 1950–2015; (2) improve GS estimates for New Zealand by adding additional dimensions to GS, i.e. forestry; (3) investigate the relationship between several GS measures and the discounted values of GDP per capita and consumption per capita, used to proxy well-being; (4) test a series of hypotheses which relate GS to the change in future well-being using the framework proposed by Ferreira et al. (World Bank Econ Rev 22(2):233–248, 2008.  https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhn008) and (5) investigate the effects of a growing population on the availability of future capital stocks by considering the consequences of “wealth-dilution” as defined by Ferreira et al. (2008). The paper makes a contribution to the literature on GS, particularly in the context of New Zealand, by considering patterns of GS and well-being over a longer time span of data than have been previously used and add to a relatively small, but growing literature on tests of GS using long or relatively long time-series data [see, e.g. Greasley et al. (J Environ Econ Manag 67(2):171–188, 2014.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2013.12.001, Environ Dev Econ 22:674–98, 2017) and Hanley et al. (Enviro Resour Econ 63(2):313–338, (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-015-9928-7]. We conclude, based on the data used here, that New Zealand’s GS has been positive (i.e. weakly sustainable), since the start of our data series, even without allowing for the contribution of technological advancement. However, we also conclude that the effects of a growing population and a savings gap have led to a “wealth-dilution” effect needed to maintain real wealth per capita, as we estimate that there was an average savings gap (GS as a percentage of gross national savings) over the period 1955–2015 of 0.5% per annum.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages39
JournalEnvironment, Development and Sustainability
VolumeFirst Online
Early online date16 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 16 Jun 2018

    Research areas

  • Sustainability, Genuine savings, Natural capital, Hartwick rule, New Zealand

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. The Circular Economy: swings and roundabouts?

    Millar, N., McLaughlin, E. & Börger, T., Apr 2019, In : Ecological Economics. 158, p. 11-19 9 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Australia: a land of missed opportunities?

    Greasley, D., McLaughlin, E., Hanley, N. & Oxley, L., Dec 2017, In : Environment and Development Economics. 22, 6, p. 674-698

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Accounting for sustainable development over the long-run: lessons from Germany

    Blum, M., McLaughlin, E. & Hanley, N., 2 Oct 2017, In : German Economic Review. Early View

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. A Sustainable Century? Genuine Savings in developing and developed countries, 1900-2000

    Blum, M., Ducoing, C. & McLaughlin, E., 15 Sep 2017, National Wealth: What is Missing, Why it Matters. Hamilton, K. & Hepburn, C. (eds.). Oxford University Press

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Related by journal

  1. Context-appropriate environmental attitude measurement in Africa using the Campbell paradigm

    Ogunbode, C. A., Henn, L. & Tausch, N., 25 Oct 2018, In : Environment, Development and Sustainability. In press

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 253428318

Top