Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Glaucoma and intraocular pressure in EPIC-Norfolk Eye Study: cross sectional study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

DOI

Open Access permissions

Open

Author(s)

Michelle P. Y. Chan, David C. Broadway, Anthony P. Khawaja, Jennifer L. Y. Yip, David F. Garway-Heath, Jennifer M. Burr, Robert Luben, Shabina Hayat, Nichola Dalzell, Kay-Tee Khaw, Paul J. Foster

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Objectives: To report the distribution of intraocular pressure (IOP) by age and sex and the prevalence of glaucoma.
Design: Community based cross sectional observational study.
Setting: EPIC-Norfolk cohort in Norwich and the surrounding rural and urban areas.
Participants: 8623 participants aged 48-92 recruited from the community who underwent ocular examination to identify glaucoma.
Main outcome measures: Prevalence and characteristics of glaucoma, distribution of IOP, and the sensitivity and specificity of IOP for case finding for glaucoma.
Results: The mean IOP in 8401 participants was 16.3 mm Hg (95% confidence interval 16.2 mm Hg to 16.3 mm Hg; SD 3.6 mm Hg). In 363 participants (4%), glaucoma was present in either eye; 314 (87%) had primary open angle glaucoma. In the remaining participants, glaucoma was suspected in 607 (7%), and 863 (10.0%) had ocular hypertension. Two thirds (242) of those with glaucoma had previously already received the diagnosis. In 76% of patients with newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma (83/107), the mean IOP was under the threshold for ocular hypertension (21 mm Hg). No one IOP threshold provided adequately high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of glaucoma.
Conclusions: In this British community, cases of glaucoma, suspected glaucoma, and ocular hypertension represent a large number of potential referrals to the hospital eye service. The use of IOP for detection of those with glaucoma is inaccurate and probably not viable.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article numberj3889
Number of pages7
JournalBMJ
Volume358
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Sep 2017

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Primary trabeculectomy for advanced glaucoma: pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial (TAGS)

    TAGS Study Group, King, A. J., Hudson, J., Fernie, G., Kernohan, A., Azuara-Blanco, A., Burr, J., Homer, T., Shabaninejad, H., Sparrow, J. M., Garway-Heath, D., Barton, K., Norrie, J., McDonald, A., Vale, L., MacLennan, G. & Kousha, O., 12 May 2021, In: BMJ. 373, 11 p., n1014.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. EFFECT OF CORNEAL CROSS-LINKING vs STANDARD CARE ON KERATOCONUS PROGRESSION IN YOUNG PATIENTS: THE KERALINK RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

    Keralink Trial Study Group, 20 Apr 2021, In: Ophthalmology.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Trends in diabetic retinopathy screening attendance and associations with vision impairment attributable to diabetes in a large nationwide cohort

    Lawrenson, J. G., Bourmpaki, E., Bunce, C., Stratton, I. M., Gardner, P., Anderson, J. & EROS Study Group, Apr 2021, In: Diabetic Medicine. 38, 4, 11 p., e14425.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared with phacoemulsification: the FACT non-inferiority RCT

    Day, A. C., Burr, J. M., Bennett, K., Hunter, R., Bunce, C., Doré, C. J., Nanavaty, M. A., Balaggan, K. S. & Wilkins, M. R., 1 Jan 2021, In: Health Technology Assessment. 25, 6, p. 1-68 68 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. British Medical Journal (Journal)

    Gozde Ozakinci (Reviewer)

    2013

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesPeer review of manuscripts

Related by journal

  1. What is being done to look after doctors during covid-19 and beyond?

    Johnston, P. W., Scottish Medical Education Research Consortium (SMERC) , Gibson Smith, K., Walker, KA., Gordon, L., Scanlan, GA., Aitken, G., Pope, L., Cairns, P., Cecil, J. E., Cunningham, K. B., Laidlaw, A. H., Tooman, T. R., Ferguson, J. & Wakeling, J., 11 Mar 2021, The BMJ.

    Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

Related by journal

  1. Pandemic fatigue? How adherence to covid-19 regulations has been misrepresented and why it matters

    Reicher, S. & Drury, J., 18 Jan 2021, In: BMJ. 372, n137.

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

  2. Primary trabeculectomy for advanced glaucoma: pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial (TAGS)

    TAGS Study Group, King, A. J., Hudson, J., Fernie, G., Kernohan, A., Azuara-Blanco, A., Burr, J., Homer, T., Shabaninejad, H., Sparrow, J. M., Garway-Heath, D., Barton, K., Norrie, J., McDonald, A., Vale, L., MacLennan, G. & Kousha, O., 12 May 2021, In: BMJ. 373, 11 p., n1014.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Sex, gender, and medical data

    Bewley, S., McCartney, M., Meads, C. & Rogers, A., 19 Mar 2021, In: BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 372, p. n735

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Sex, gender, and medical data

    Bewley, S., McCartney, M., Meads, C. & Rogers, A., 19 Mar 2021, In: BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 372, p. n735

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  5. Should masks be worn outdoors?

    Javid, B., Bassler, D., Bryant, M. B., Cevik, M., Tufekci, Z. & Baral, S., 28 Apr 2021, In: BMJ. 373, 8289, 3 p., n1036.

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

ID: 251071289

Top