Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Good practice or positive action? Using Q methodology to identify competing views on improving gender equality in academic medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Louise D Bryant, Paula Burkinshaw, Allan O House, Robert M West, Vicky Ward

School/Research organisations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The number of women entering medicine has increased significantly, yet women are still under-represented at senior levels in academic medicine. To support the gender equality action plan at one School of Medicine, this study sought to (1) identify the range of viewpoints held by staff on how to address gender inequality and (2) identify attitudinal barriers to change.

DESIGN: Q methodology. 50 potential interventions representing good practice or positive action, and addressing cultural, organisational and individual barriers to gender equality, were ranked by participants according to their perception of priority.

SETTING: The School of Medicine at the University of Leeds, UK.

PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-five staff members were purposively sampled to represent gender and academic pay grade.

RESULTS: Principal components analysis identified six competing viewpoints on how to address gender inequality. Four viewpoints favoured positive action interventions: (1) support careers of women with childcare commitments, (2) support progression of women into leadership roles rather than focus on women with children, (3) support careers of all women rather than just those aiming for leadership, and (4) drive change via high-level financial and strategic initiatives. Two viewpoints favoured good practice with no specific focus on women by (5) recognising merit irrespective of gender and (6) improving existing career development practice. No viewpoint was strongly associated with gender, pay grade or role; however, latent class analysis identified that female staff were more likely than male to prioritise the setting of equality targets. Attitudinal barriers to the setting of targets and other positive action initiatives were identified, and it was clear that not all staff supported positive action approaches.

CONCLUSIONS: The findings and the approach have utility for those involved in gender equality work in other medical and academic institutions. However, the impact of such initiatives needs to be evaluated in the longer term.

Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere015973
Number of pages9
JournalBMJ Open
Volume7
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Aug 2017

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Development of REsources based on reasonable adjustments to MAINstream diabetes and obesity care for adults with a learning disability: The REMAIN project

    Russell, A. M., Bryant, L., House, A., Ward, V., Stones, C. & Witty, K., Mar 2019, In : Diabetic Medicine. 36, S1, p. 112-112 1 p., P250.

    Research output: Contribution to journalAbstract

  2. Using frameworks and models to support knowledge mobilization

    Ward, V., 2019, The Role of Knowledge Brokers in Education. Malin, J. & Brown, C. (eds.). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, p. 168-181

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

  3. Knowledge Translation: Key Concepts, Terms and Activities

    Rushmer, R., Ward, V., Nguyen, T. & Kuchenmüller, T., 2019, Population health monitoring: Climbing the information pyramid. Verschuuren, M. & van Oers, H. (eds.). Springer Nature, p. 127-150

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

  4. Creating and implementing local health and wellbeing policy: networks, interactions and collective knowledge creation amongst public sector managers

    Ward, V., Smith, S., Keen, J., West, R. & House, A., Aug 2018, In : Evidence & Policy. 14, 3, p. 477-498 22 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. A cohort study of high maternal Body Mass Index and the risk of adverse pregnancy and delivery outcomes in Scotland

    Doi, L., Williams, A. J., Marryat, L. & Frank, J., 20 Feb 2020, In : BMJ Open. 10, 2, 9 p., e026168.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Accuracy and consequences of using trial-of-antibiotics for TB diagnosis (ACT-TB study): protocol for a randomised controlled clinical trial

    Divala, T. H., Fielding, K. L., Sloan, D. J., French, N., Nliwasa, M., MacPherson, P., Kandulu, C. C., Chiume, L., Chilanga, S., Ndaferankhande, M. J. & Corbett, E. L., Mar 2020, In : BMJ Open. 10, 3, 10 p., e033999.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 253147971

Top