Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Graph-based risk assessment and error detection in radiation therapy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

DOI

Open Access Status

  • Embargoed (until 6/02/22)

Author(s)

Reshma Munbodh, Juliana Kuster Filipe Bowles, Hitten Zaveri

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to formalize and automate quality assurance (QA) in radiation oncology. QA in radiation oncology entails a multistep verification of complex, personalized radiation plans to treat cancer involving an interdisciplinary team and high technology, multivendor software and hardware. We addressed the pretreatment physics chart review (TPCR) using methods from graph theory and constraint programming to study the effect of dependencies between variables and automatically identify logical inconsistencies and how they propagate.
Materials and Methods: We used a modular approach to decompose the TPCR process into tractable units comprising subprocesses, modules and variables. Modules represent the main software entities comprised in the radiation treatment planning workflow and subprocesses group the checks to be performed by functionality. Module‐associated variables serve as inputs to the subprocesses. Relationships between variables were modeled by means of a directed graph. The detection of errors, in the form of inconsistencies, was formalized as a constraint satisfaction problem whereby checks were encoded as logical formulae. The sequence in which subprocesses are visited was described in a activity diagram.
Results
: The comprehensive model for the TPCR process comprised 5 modules, 19 subprocesses and 346 variables, 225 of which were distinct. Modules included ”Treatment Planning System” and ”Record and Verify System”. Subprocesses included ”Dose Prescription”, ”Documents”, ”CT Integrity”, ”Anatomical Contours”, ”Beam Configuration”, ”Dose Calculation”, ”3D Dose Distribution Quality” and ”Treatment Approval”. Variable inconsistencies, their source and propagation are determined by checking for constraint violation and through graph traversal. Impact scores, obtained through graph traversal, combined with severity scores associated with an inconsistency, allow risk assessment.
Conclusions: Directed graphs combined with constraint programming hold promise for formalizing complex QA processes in radiation oncology, performing risk assessment and automating the TPCR process. Though complex, the process is tractable.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)965-977
Number of pages13
JournalMedical Physics
Volume48
Issue number3
Early online date6 Feb 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2021

    Research areas

  • Graphs, Automated checks, Physics chart review, Risk assessment, Model

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Studying trajectories of multimorbidity: a systematic scoping review of longitudinal approaches and evidence

    Cezard, G., McHale, C. T., Sullivan, F., Bowles, J. K. F. & Keenan, K., 22 Nov 2021, In: BMJ Open. 11, 11, e048485.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Design of a trustworthy and resilient data sharing platform for healthcare provision

    Banton, M., Bowles, J., Silvina, A. & Webber, T., 8 Sep 2021, (E-pub ahead of print) Dependable Computing – EDCC 2021 Workshops - DREAMS, DSOGRI, SERENE 2021, Proceedings. Adler, R., Bennaceur, A., Burton, S., Di Salle, A., Nostro, N., Olsen, R. L., Saidi, S., Schleiss, P., Schneider, D. & Schwefel, H-P. (eds.). Springer Science and Business Media, p. 144-151 8 p. (Communications in Computer and Information Science; vol. 1462).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

  3. On the benefits and security risks of a user-centric data sharing platform for healthcare provision

    Banton, M., Bowles, J., Silvina, A. & Webber, T., 21 Jun 2021, UMAP 2021 - Adjunct Publication of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. Masthoff, J., Herder, E., Tintarev, N. & Tkalčič, M. (eds.). Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, p. 351-356 6 p.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

  4. APPS 2021: Third International Workshop on Adaptive and Personalized Privacy and Security

    Constantinides, A., Belk, M., Fidas, C., Bowles, J. & Pitsillides, A., 21 Jun 2021, Adjunct Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP '21). Masthoff, J., Herder, E., Tintarev, N. & Tkalčič, M. (eds.). New York: ACM, p. 336–337 2 p.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

  5. A blockchain-based healthcare platform for secure personalised data sharing

    Bowles, J., Webber, T., Blackledge, E. & Vermeulen, A., 27 May 2021, Public Health and Informatics. Mantas, J., Stoicu-Tivadar, L., Chronaki, C., Hasman, A., Weber, P., Gallos, P., Crişan-Vida, M., Zoulias, E. & Chirila, O. S. (eds.). IOS Press, p. 208-212 5 p. (Studies in Health Technology and Informatics; vol. 281).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Related by journal

  1. Formalization and Automation of Quality Assurance Processes in Radiation Oncology

    Munbodh, R., Zaveri, H., Caminati, M. & Bowles, J., 31 Jul 2018, In: Medical Physics. 45, 6, p. E274-E274 1 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalAbstractpeer-review

ID: 271640924

Top