Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

High levels of socioeconomic deprivation do not inhibit patients’ communication of concerns in head and neck cancer review clinics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Open Access Status

  • Embargoed (until 13/06/19)

Abstract

To examine associations between socioeconomic status and the extent to which patients with cancer of the head and neck expressed concerns to surgeons during routine follow-up clinics, we analysed audio recordings of 110 consultations with one consultant. We used the Verona Coding Definitions of Emotional Sequences (VRCoDES) to measure communication between the doctor and the patient, and grouped the English indices of multiple deprivation (IMD) 2015 scores into deciles to compare the VRCoDES with socioeconomic status. There were no significant correlations between IMD decile and the number and type of cues and concerns, or the type of response by the consultant, but there was a positive correlation between IMD decile and duration of appointment (r = 0.288, p < 0.01). When the duration of appointment was controlled for, there was a negative correlation between IMD decile and number of cues and concerns (r = −0.221, p < 0.05). These findings question the assumption that socioeconomic status is associated with a patient’s willingness to express concerns. Shorter consultations suggest that less time is spent responding to their concerns or building a rapport. Clinicians might find it advantageous to adopt strategies that will improve their understanding of these patients and help them to communicate more effectively.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)536-539
Number of pages4
JournalBritish Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume56
Issue number6
Early online date13 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2018

    Research areas

  • Doctor-patient communication, Head and neck cancer, Deprivation, VRCoDES, Indices of multiple deprivation

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Patient centred consultation, satisfaction and young patients: a cross-country analysis

    Conti, A. A. & Humphris, G. M., Apr 2019, In : Patient Education and Counseling. 102, 4, p. 782-789 8 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Fear of cancer recurrence in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: a systematic review of the literature

    Yang, Y., Li, W., Wen, Y., Wang, H., Sun, H., Liang, W., Zhang, B. & Humphris, G., Apr 2019, In : Psycho-Oncology. 28, 4, p. 675-686

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

  3. Automated screening for distress: a perspective for the future

    Rana, R., Latif, S., Gururajan, R., Gray, A., Mackenzie, G., Humphris, G. & Dunn, J., 18 Mar 2019, In : European Journal of Cancer Care. Early View, e13033.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Modelling reassurances of clinicians with Hidden Markov models

    Popov, V., Ellis-Robinson, A. & Humphris, G., 9 Jan 2019, In : BMC Medical Research Methodology. 19, 10 p., 11.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Facial appearance after operations for oral and oropharyngeal cancer: A comparison of casenotes and patient-completed questionnaire

    Millsopp, L., Brandom, L., Humphris, G., Lowe, D., Stat, C. & Rogers, S., Oct 2006, In : British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 44, p. 358-363 6 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 253233217