Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

How are emotional distress and reassurance expressed in medical consultations for people with long-term conditions who were unable to receive curative treatment? A pilot observational study with huntington’s disease and prostate cancer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective
It is unclear whether how people with long-term conditions express distress, and how clinicians respond, influences perceptions of consultation outcomes. The pilot study examined emotional distress and reassurance in consultations with people whose long-term conditions (at the time of consultations) were treated using active surveillance or symptom management (as no curative treatment was suitable).

Methods
An observational pilot study was conducted involving consultations between people with long-term conditions and their respective clinician. Consultations between three clinicians (two Huntington’s Disease; one Prostate Cancer) and 22 people with long-term conditions (11 Huntington’s Disease; 11 Prostate Cancer) were audio-recorded. Participants also completed an expanded Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure. Two researchers coded sessions using Verona Coding Definitions of Emotional Sequences (VR-CoDES/VR-CoDES-P). Code frequencies were calculated, t tests performed between conditions, and Pearson’s correlations performed for associations between CARE responses and clinician utterances.

Results
People with long-term conditions expressed emotional distress on average 4.45 times per session, averaging 1.09 Concern and 3.36 Cue utterances. Clinicians responded with more explicit (2.59) and space-providing (3.36), than non-explicit (1.86) and space-reducing (1.09), responses per session. Clinicians expressed spontaneous reassurance on average 5.18 times per session, averaging 3.77 Cognitive and 1.5 Affective reassurance utterances. Huntington’s Disease consultations featured significantly more 'Cues', 'Concerns' and 'Overall' 'Emotional Distress', and 'Cognitive' and 'Overall' ‘Reassurance'.

Conclusion
Emotional distress was expressed more using hints than explicit concern utterances. Clinicians predominantly explicitly explored distress rather than providing information/advice and provided advice using spontaneous cognitive reassurance. People with Huntington’s Disease expressed more concerns and received more reassurance, indicating different needs between conditions. Future research is required to explore emotional distress and reassurance in a larger sample of participants and long-term condition types, and how the practical implications of these findings may be used to enhance outcomes of consultations.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number119
Number of pages11
JournalPilot and Feasibility Studies
Volume7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jun 2021

    Research areas

  • Affective reassurance, Cognitive reassurance, Emotional distress, Huntington's disease, Prostate cancer

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. How physicians respond to negative emotions in high-risk preoperative conversations

    Tie, B., Liu, X., Yin, M., Humphris, G., Zhang, Y., Liu, H., Zhao, Y. & Wang, Q., 9 Jul 2021, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Patient Education and Counseling.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Does cancer type influence the impact of recurrence? a review of the experience of patients with breast or prostate cancer recurrence

    Stewart, R. J., Humphris, G. M., Donaldson, J. & Cruickshank, S., 29 Jun 2021, In: Frontiers in Psychology. 12, 13 p., 635660.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Balance Right in Multiple Sclerosis (BRiMS): a feasibility randomised controlled trial of a falls prevention programme

    Gunn, H., Stevens, K. N., Creanor, S., Andrade, J., Paul, L., Miller, L., Green, C., Ewings, P., Barton, A., Berrow, M., Vickery, J., Marshall, B., Zajicek, J. & Freeman, J. A., 4 Jan 2021, In: Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 7, 1, 2.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. A controlled pilot trial of a nurse-led intervention (Mini-AFTERc) to manage fear of cancer recurrence in patients affected by breast cancer

    McHale, C. T., Cruickshank, S., Torrens, C., Armes, J., Fenlon, D., Banks, E., Kelsey, T. & Humphris, G. M., 7 May 2020, In: Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 6, 10 p., 60.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. A mixed-methods feasibility study protocol to assess the communication behaviours within the dental health professional-parent-child triad in a general dental practice setting

    Yuan, S., Humphris, G., Ross, A., MacPherson, L., Zhou, Y. & Freeman, R., 13 Aug 2018, In: Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 4, 9 p., 136.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 274571197

Top