Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

How do United Kingdom (UK) medical schools identify and support undergraduate medical students who ‘fail’ communication assessments? A national survey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Connie Wiskin, Eva Doherty, Martin von Fragstein, Anita Helen Laidlaw, Helen Salisbury

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Background
The doctor’s ability to communicate effectively (with patients, relatives, advocates and healthcare colleagues) relates directly to health outcomes, and so is core to clinical practice. The remediation of medical students’ clinical communication ability is rarely addressed in medical education literature. There is nothing in the current literature reporting a contemporary national picture of how communication difficulties are managed, and the level of consequence (progression implications) for students of performing poorly. This survey aimed to consolidate practices for identifying and processes for managing students who ‘fail’ communication assessments across all UK medical schools.
Methods
Data were collected via an email survey to all leads for clinical communication in all UK Medical Schools for the UK Council for Clinical Communication in Undergraduate Medical Education.
Results
All but two participating Schools reported some means of support and/or remediation in communication. There was diversity of approach, and variance in the level of systemisation adopted. Variables such as individuality of curricula, resourcing issues, student cohort size and methodological preferences were implicated as explaining diversity. Support is relatively ad hoc, and often in the hands of a particular dedicated individual or team with an interest in communication delivery with few Schools reporting robust, centralised, school level processes.
Conclusions
This survey has demonstrated that few Medical Schools have no identifiable system of managing their students’ clinical communication difficulties. However, some Schools reported ad hoc approaches and only a small number had a centralised programme. There is scope for discussion and benchmarking of best practice across all Schools with allocation of appropriate resources to support this.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number95
JournalBMC Medical Education
Volume13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Jul 2013

    Research areas

  • Clinical communication, Assessment, Survey, Support

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Adherence

    Laidlaw, A. H., Feb 2019, Psychology and Sociology applied to Medicine. van Teijlingen, E. R. & Humphris, G. (eds.). fourth ed. London: Elsevier, p. 92 2 p.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

  2. Foundation Year 2 doctors’ reasons for leaving UK medicine: an in-depth analysis of decision-making using semistructured interviews

    Smith, S. E., Tallentire, V. R., Pope, L. M., Laidlaw, A. H. & Morrison, J., 2 Mar 2018, In : BMJ Open. 8, 17 p., e019456.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Understanding undergraduate student perceptions of mental health, mental well-being and help-seeking behaviour

    Laidlaw, A. H., McLellan, J. & Ozakinci, G., Dec 2016, In : Studies in Higher Education. 41, 12, p. 2156-2168 13 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Does access to a portable ophthalmoscope improve skill acquisition in direct ophthalmoscopy? A method comparison study in undergraduate medical education

    Gilmour-White, J. A., Picton, A., Blaikie, A., Denniston, A. K., Blanch, R., Coleman, J. & Murray, P. I., 13 Jun 2019, In : BMC Medical Education. 19, 8 p., 201.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Insightful Practice: a robust measure of medical students' professional response to feedback on their performance

    Murphy, D., Aitchison, P., Hernandez Santiago, V., Davey, P., Mires, G. & Nathwani, D., 1 Aug 2015, In : BMC Medical Education. 15, 11 p., 125.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. National survey of clinical communication assessment in medical education in the United Kingdom (UK)

    Laidlaw, A. H., Salisbury, H., Doherty, E. M. & Wiskin, C., 13 Jan 2014, In : BMC Medical Education. 14, 10.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Graduate attributes in the disciplines of Medicine, Dentistry and Veterinary Medicine: a survey of expert opinions

    Laidlaw, A. H., Guild, S. & Struthers, J., 5 Jun 2009, In : BMC Medical Education. 9, 6 p., 28.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 55549834

Top