Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

How does legacy create sticking points for environmental management? Insights from challenges to implementation of the ecosystem approach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

DOI

Open Access permissions

Open

Author(s)

Kerry A. Waylen, Kirsty L. Blackstock, Kirsty L. Holstead

School/Research organisations

Abstract

There are many recommendations for environmental management practices to adopt more holistic or systems-based approaches and to strengthen stakeholder participation. However, management practices do not always match or achieve these ideals. We explore why theory may not be reflected by practice by exploring experiences of projects seeking to implement the ecosystem approach, a concept that entails participatory holistic management. A qualitative inductive approach was used to understand the processes, achievements, and challenges faced by 16 projects across the British Isles. Many projects made significant progress toward their goals, yet failed to achieve fully participatory holistic management. Many of the challenges that contributed to this failure can be explained in terms of the legacy effects of previous projects and the wider social-ecological system. These legacy effects do not necessarily imply a fixed path dependency or lock-in. We therefore call these effects sticking points. Drawing on the literature on institutional analysis and knowledge production, we distinguish three main types of sticking point: (1) institutional, arising from previous ways of working; (2) cognitive, arising from ways of framing and knowing; and (3) political, arising from pre-existing power relations. These sticking points may interact. For example, attempts to promote systems thinking and management may be impeded by a tendency for reductionist thinking, itself reinforced by the constraints on prioritization that arise from pre-existing statutory targets. These influences often arise from aspects of societal and institutional context beyond the control of any individual project. Stickiness is not necessarily all bad, but often acts to constrain the “opening up” away from previous approaches. Because the long-term success of natural resource management is argued to depend on more integrated, participatory, and holistic environmental management, we argue that these sticking points demand more explicit attention in both research and practice.

Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
JournalEcology and Society
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2015

    Research areas

  • Adaptive management, Conservation, Institutional inertia, Participation, Pathways, Systems thinking

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Resocializing digital water transformations: outlining social science perspectives on the digital water journey

    Hoolohan, C., Amankwaa, G., Browne, A., Clear, A., Holstead, K. L., Machen, R., Michalec, O. & Ward, S., 3 Feb 2021, In: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water. Early View, 17 p., e1512.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Transforming knowledge systems for life on Earth: visions of future systems and how to get there

    Fazey, I., Schäpke, N., Caniglia, G., Hodgson, A., Kendrick, I., Lyon, C., Page, G., Patterson, J., Riedy, C., Strasser, T., Verveen, S., Adams, D., Goldstein, B., Klaes, M., Leicester, G., Linyard, A., McCurdy, A., Ryan, P., Sharpe, B., Silvestri, G. & 163 others, Abdurrahim, A. Y., Abson, D., Adetunji, O. S., Aldunce, P., Alvarez-Pereira, C., Amparo, J. M., Amundsen, H., Anderson, L., Andersson, L., Asquith, M., Augenstein, K., Barrie, J., Bent, D., Bentz, J., Bergsten, A., Berzonsky, C., Bina, O., Blackstock, K., Boehnert, J., Bradbury, H., Brand, C., Böhme (born Sangmeister), J., Bøjer, M. M., Carmen, E., Charli-Joseph, L., Choudhury, S., Chunhachoti-ananta, S., Cockburn, J., Colvin, J., Connon, I. L. C., Cornforth, R., Cox, R. S., Cradock-Henry, N., Cramer, L., Cremaschi, A., Dannevig, H., Day, C. T., de Lima Hutchison, C., de Vrieze, A., Desai, V., Dolley, J., Duckett, D., Durrant, R. A., Egermann, M., Elsner (Adams), E., Fremantle, C., Fullwood-Thomas, J., Galafassi, D., Gobby, J., Golland, A., González-Padrón, S. K., Gram-Hanssen, I., Grandin, J., Grenni, S., Lauren Gunnell, J., Gusmao, F., Hamann, M., Harding, B., Harper, G., Hesselgren, M., Hestad, D., Heykoop, C. A., Holmén, J., Holstead, K., Hoolohan, C., Horcea-Milcu, A-I., Horlings, L. G., Howden, S. M., Howell, R. A., Huque, S. I., Inturias Canedo, M. L., Iro, C. Y., Ives, C. D., John, B., Joshi, R., Juarez-Bourke, S., Juma, D. W., Karlsen, B. C., Kliem, L., Kläy, A., Kuenkel, P., Kunze, I., Lam, D. P. M., Lang, D. J., Larkin, A., Light, A., Luederitz, C., Luthe, T., Maguire, C., Mahecha-Groot, A-M., Malcolm, J., Marshall, F., Maru, Y., McLachlan, C., Mmbando, P., Mohapatra, S., Moore, M-L., Moriggi, A., Morley-Fletcher, M., Moser, S., Mueller, K. M., Mukute, M., Mühlemeier, S., Naess, L. O., Nieto-Romero, M., Novo, P., ÓBrien, K., O'Connell, D. A., O'Donnell, K., Olsson, P., Pearson, K. R., Pereira, L., Petridis, P., Peukert, D., Phear, N., Pisters, S. R., Polsky, M., Pound, D., Preiser, R., Rahman, M. S., Reed, M. S., Revell, P., Rodriguez, I., Rogers, B. C., Rohr, J., Nordbø Rosenberg, M., Ross, H., Russell, S., Ryan, M., Saha, P., Schleicher, K., Schneider, F., Scoville-Simonds, M., Searle, B., Sebhatu, S. P., Sesana, E., Silverman, H., Singh, C., Sterling, E., Stewart, S-J., Tàbara, J. D., Taylor, D., Thornton, P., Tribaldos, T. M., Tschakert, P., Uribe-Calvo, N., Waddell, S., Waddock, S., van der Merwe, L., van Mierlo, B., van Zwanenberg, P., Velarde, S. J., Washbourne, C-L., Waylen, K., Weiser, A., Wight, I., Williams, S., Woods, M., Wolstenholme, R., Wright, N., Wunder, S., Wyllie, A. & Young, H. R., Dec 2020, In: Energy Research and Social Science. 70, 18 p., 101724.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. The influence of public funding on community-based sustainability projects in Scotland

    Dinnie, E. & Holstead, K. L., Dec 2018, In: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. 29, p. 25-33 9 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Putting community to use in environmental policy making: emerging trends in Scotland and the UK

    Holstead, K., Taylor Aiken, G., Eadson, W. & Braunholtz-Speight, T., 19 Sep 2018, In: Geography Compass. 12, 9, e12381.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  5. Community-led initiatives’ everyday politics for sustainability – Conflicting rationalities and aspirations for change?

    Fischer, A., Holstead, K. L., Hendrickson, C., Virkkula, O. & Prampolini, A., 1 Sep 2017, In: Environment and Planning A. 49, 9, p. 1986-2006

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Peatland and wetland ecosystems in Peruvian Amazonia: indigenous classifications and perspectives

    Schulz, C., Brañas, M. M., Núñez Pérez, C., Del Águila Villacorta, M., Laurie, N., Lawson, I. T. & Roucoux, K. H., 30 Apr 2019, In: Ecology and Society. 24, 2, 16 p., 12.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. The “social” aspect of social-ecological systems: a critique of analytical frameworks and findings from a multisite study of coastal sustainability

    Stojanovic, T., McNae, H., Tett, P., Potts, T. W., Reis, J., Smith, H. D. & Dillingham, I., 1 Sep 2016, In: Ecology and Society. 21, 3, 15.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Interacting effects of change in climate, human population, land use, and water use on biodiversity and ecosystem services

    Elmhagen, B., Destouni, G., Angerbjörn, A., Borgström, S., Boyd, E., Cousins, S. A. O., Dalén, L., Ehrlén, J., Ermold, M., Hambäck, P. A., Hedlund, J., Hylander, K., Jaramillo, F., Lagerholm, V. K., Lyon, S. W., Moor, H., Nykvist, B., Pasanen-Mortensen, M., Plue, J., Prieto, C. & 2 others, van der Velde, Y. & Lindborg, R., 2015, In: Ecology and Society. 20, 1, 23.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Resilience and higher order thinking

    Fazey, I. R. A., Aug 2010, In: Ecology and Society. 15, 3, p. art 9

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 268198537

Top