Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

How prior experience and task presentation modulate innovation in 6-year-old-children

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Open Access Status

  • Embargoed (until 9/01/20)

Abstract

Low innovation rates have been found with children until 6–8 years of age in tasks that required them to make a tool. Little is known about how prior experience and task presentation influence innovation rates. In the current study, we investigated these aspects in the floating peanut task (FPT), which required children to pour water into a vertical tube to retrieve a peanut. In three experiments, we varied the amount of plants that 6-year-olds (N = 256) watered prior to the task (zero, one, or five plants), who watered the plants (child or experimenter), and the distance and salience of the water source. We expected that prior experience with the water would modulate task performance by either boosting innovation rates (facilitation effect) or reducing them given that children would possibly learn that the water was for watering plants (functional fixedness effect). Our results indicate robustly low innovation rates in 6-year-olds. However, children’s performance improved to some extent with increased salience of the water source as well as with an experimenter-given hint. Due to the low innovation rates in this age group, we investigated whether watering plants prior to the FPT would influence innovation rates in 7- and 8-year-olds (N = 33), for which we did not find evidence. We conclude that 6-year-olds struggle with innovation but that they are more likely to innovate if crucial aspects of the task are made more salient. Thus, although 6-year-olds can innovate, they require more physical and social scaffolding than older children and adults.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)87-103
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Experimental Child Psychology
Volume180
Early online date9 Jan 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2019

    Research areas

  • Causal understanding, Floating peanut task, Functional fixedness, Innovation, Primates, Prior experience

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Theory of mind in animals: current and future directions

    Krupenye, C. & Call, J., 17 May 2019, In : Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science. Early View, e1503.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

  2. Language origins viewed in spontaneous and interactive vocal rates of human and bonobo infants

    Oller, D. K., Griebel, U., Iyer, S. N., Jhang, Y., Warlaumont, A. S., Dale, R. & Call, J., 2 Apr 2019, In : Frontiers in Psychology. 10, 18 p., 729.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Long-term memory of past events in great apes

    Lewis, A. V. M., Berntsen, D. & Call, J., 1 Apr 2019, In : Current Directions in Psychological Science. 28, 2, p. 117-123 7 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Absolute brain size predicts dog breed differences in executive function

    Horschler, D. J., Hare, B., Call, J., Kaminski, J., Miklosi, A. & MacLean, E. L., Mar 2019, In : Animal Cognition. 22, 2, p. 187-198 12 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Comprehension of iconic gestures by chimpanzees and human children

    Bohn, M., Call, J. & Tomasello, M., Feb 2016, In : Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 142, p. 1-17 17 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. I won't tell: Young children show loyalty to their group by keeping group secrets

    Misch, A., Over, H. & Carpenter, M., Feb 2016, In : Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 142, p. 96-106

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. “Model age-based” and “copy when uncertain” biases in children’s social learning of a novel task

    Wood, L. A., Harrison, R. A., Lucas, A. J., McGuigan, N., Burdett, E. R. R. & Whiten, A., Oct 2016, In : Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 150, p. 272-284 13 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 257381272