Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

How to be a be a theological panpsychist, but not a Process theologian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Open Access Status

  • Embargoed (until 14/07/21)


School/Research organisations


Follow these six easy steps and learn how a Christian theologian might affirm panpsychism, without becoming a Process theologian. The Genetic Argument for panpsychism is outlined in the first four steps: (1) affirm mental realism, (2) deny psycho-physical reductionism, (3) affirm fundamental monism, and (4) deny brute emergence. These four steps result in a flexible version of panpsychism; the view that consciousness is a fundamental and probably ubiquitous feature of the universe. During the last century, panpsychism has been a part of the Process theologian’s arsenal. What then is the theologian, who disagrees with Process metaphysics and rejects the Process doctrine of God, to do? To deny Process theology this paper outlines two further steps: (5) maintain a substance ontology, and most importantly, (6) affirm the doctrine of creation ex nihilo. The result is a position I call ‘theological panpsychism’; a version of panpsychism compatible with traditional, mainstream Christian theology. By taking these six steps, Christian theologians can safely explore the potential theological benefits of panpsychism, without fear that one is inadvertently advancing Process theology.


Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10-29
Number of pages20
JournalPhilosophy, Theology and the Sciences
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 14 Jul 2020

    Research areas

  • Panpsychism, Process theology, Consciousness, Evolution, Creation ex nihilo, Panexperientialism

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Christian Consolation and the Task of Theology Today

    Lamb, R. A. & Leidenhag, J. (ed.), 21 Jan 2021, (Submitted) In: Theology in Scotland.

    Research output: Contribution to journalSpecial issuepeer-review

  2. “Be Right Back” and the Ethics of Mourning: (In)Authenticity and Resurrection in the Digital Age

    Lamb, R. A. & Leidenhag, J. M. B., 2021, (Accepted/In press) Black Mirror and Theology. Lexington Books

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

  3. The challenge of autism for relational approaches to theological anthropology

    Leidenhag, J., 17 Dec 2020, In: International Journal of Systematic Theology. Early View, 27 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. On the revelation of the Holy Spirit and the problem of thirdness

    Leidenhag, J. & Kroll, K., 1 Dec 2020, The Third Person of the Trinity: Explorations in Constructive Dogmatics . Crisp, O. D. & Sanders, F. (eds.). Zondervan, p. 36-54 19 p. (Los Angeles Theology Conference Series).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

  5. Does the indwelling of the Holy Spirit require a neurotypical brain?

    Leidenhag, J., 20 Aug 2020, In: Puzzles in Science-Engaged Theology.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 266223070