Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae (Cetartiodactyla: Balaenopteridae) group sizes in line transect ship surveys: an evaluation of observer errors

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Guilherme A. Bortolotto, Daniel Danilewicz, Artur Andriolo, Alexandre Novaes Zerbini

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Accurate estimates of group sizes through line transect sampling methods are important to correctly ascertain the abundance of animals that occur in groups. Since the average observed group size is a component of the distance sampling formula, bias in these data leads to biased abundance estimates. This study aimed to evaluate the potential errors in group size estimation during line transect ship surveys to estimate abundances of the humpback whale, Megaptera novaeangliae (Borowski 1781). In a research cruise along the Brazilian coast, an experiment to collect group size information was conducted from two different sighting platforms on the same vessel. Group sizes were recorded by primary observers at first sighting (PO1) and, in some cases, after some time (PO2). A tracker (T) was located on a higher platform to estimate the sizes of groups detected by the primary observers, but tracked one group at a time until it passed abeam. Thus, the dedicated effort to obtain multiple group counts (i.e. higher platform, more time and no responsibility for detecting new groups) was expected to provide more accurate numbers. PO2 estimates were compared with PO1 estimates, and T estimates were compared with both PO1 and PO2. Additionally, ratios between T and both PO2 (R1) and PO1 (R2), and between PO2 and PO1 (R3) were calculated. To investigate a possible improvement in abundance estimates, a correction factor (CF) was computed from the ratio of T and PO2 means. Primary observer self-correction (= 1.60, CV% = 70.3) was statistically similar to the correction for the tracker (= 1.62, CV% = 84.1). CF resulted in 1 and would not improve abundance estimates. This study supports that observers conducting line transect surveys on large whales have the potential to provide group size information that is as adequate as the correction procedure adopted.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number e20150133
Pages (from-to)1-5
Number of pages5
JournalZoologia
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 May 2016

    Research areas

  • Abundance, Bias, Conservation, distance sampling, Mysticetus

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Breathing synchrony in franciscana (Pontoporia blainvillei) and Guiana dolphins (Sotalia guianensis) in Southern Brazil

    Actis, P. S., Danilewicz, D., Cremer, M. J. & Bortolotto, G. A., Jul 2018, In : Marine Mammal Science. 34, 3, p. 777-789

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. From the southern right whale hunting decline to the humpback whaling expansion: a review of whale catch records in the tropical western South Atlantic Ocean

    de Morais, I. O. B., Danilewicz, D., Zerbini, A. N., Edmundson, W., Hart, I. B. & Bortolotto, G. A., Jan 2017, In : Mammal Review. 47, 1, p. 11-23

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Whale, whale, everywhere: increasing abundance of western South Atlantic humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) in their wintering grounds

    Bortolotto, G. A., Danilewicz, D., Andriolo, A., Secchi, E. R. & Zerbini, A. N., 13 Oct 2016, In : PLoS One. 11, 10, 17 p., e0164596.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Young humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae feeding in Santa Catarina coastal waters, Southern Brazil, and a ship strike report

    Bortolotto, G. A., Kolesnikovas, C. K. M., Freire, A. S. & Simões-Lopes, P. C., 13 Jul 2016, In : Marine Biodiversity Records. 9, p. 1-6 6 p., 29.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 261541704

Top