Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Implications of farmland expansion for species abundance, richness and mean body mass in African raptor communities

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Open Access Status

  • Embargoed (until 2/05/20)

Author(s)

Philip Shaw, Micheal Kibuule, Dianah Nalwanga, George Kaphu, Michael Opige, Derek Pomeroy

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Globally, conversion of natural habitats to farmland poses the greatest extinction risk to birds, its consequences being especially pervasive in the case of large predators and scavengers, whose declines may trigger extensive cascading effects. Human population growth in sub-Saharan Africa is expected to drive a vast expansion in agricultural land by 2050, largely at the expense of pastoral land and savanna. The greatest expanse of suitable land yet to be converted to agriculture lies in East and Central Africa, including South Sudan, DRC and Tanzania. To gauge the effects of land conversion on raptor populations in this region we used road survey data from neighbouring Uganda, from which we determined linear encounter rates (birds seen 100 km−1; n = 33 species), and species richness (from 53 species). Encounter rates were much lower in pastoral land than in protected savanna (median difference: −41%; 23 species), and lower still in agricultural land (−90%; 24 species). These disparities were influenced by diet and body mass. For large eagles and vultures, encounter rates in agricultural land were 97% lower than in protected savanna (median of 12 species), whereas for smaller raptors they were 30% lower (12 species). Large, apex consumers were thus more vulnerable to farmland expansion, and this was reflected in the mean body mass of species encountered in savanna (1740 g), pastoral (995 g) and agricultural land (856 g). Body mass differences remained significant when vultures were excluded. Since threat status is linked to body mass, encounter rates for globally threatened and near-threatened species likewise showed a more pronounced deficit in farmland than those of least concern. Accordingly, pastoral and agricultural transects were less species-rich (10.6 and 6.7 raptor species 100 km−1, respectively) than savanna transects (13.2 species). Our findings suggest that the expansion of agricultural land in sub-Saharan Africa will reduce raptor populations in pastoral land and savanna by c. 50% and 90%, respectively. We propose that conservation efforts focus on identifying the causes of raptor population deficits in farmland, and on safeguarding tracts of unprotected, intact savanna, together with existing protected areas.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)164-177
Number of pages14
JournalBiological Conservation
Volume235
Early online date2 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2019

    Research areas

  • Apex consumers, Vultures, Eagles, Savanna, Agricultural impacts, Protected areas

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Densities and population sizes of raptors in Uganda’s conservation areas

    Pomeroy, D., Kibuule, M., Nalwanga, D., Kaphu, G., Opige, M. & Shaw, P., 16 Jan 2019, In : Ostrich. 90, 1, p. 25-36 12 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Another continental vulture crisis: Africa’s vultures collapsing toward extinction

    Ogada, D., Shaw, P., Beyers, R. L., Buij, R., Murn, C., Thiollay, J. M., Beale, C. M., Holdo, R. M., Pomeroy, D., Baker, N., Krüger, S. C., Botha, A., Virani, M. Z., Monadjem, A. & Sinclair, A. R. E., 26 Apr 2016, In : Conservation Letters. 9, 2, p. 89-97 9 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Ivory poachers and poison: drivers of Africa's declining vulture populations

    Ogada, D., Botha, A. & Shaw, P., 7 Dec 2015, In : Oryx. FirstView, 4 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Vulture populations in Uganda: using road survey data to measure both densities and encounter rates within protected and unprotected areas

    Pomeroy, D., Shaw, P., Opige, M., Kaphu, G., Ogada, D. L. & Virani, M. Z., Dec 2015, In : Bird Conservation International. 25, 4, p. 399-414 16 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Factors affecting feelings of justice in biodiversity conflicts: towards fairer jaguar management in Calakmul, Mexico

    Lecuyer, L., Calmé, S., Blanchet, F. G., Schmook, B. & White, R. M., 5 Jul 2019, In : Biological Conservation. 237, p. 133-144

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Uses, cultural significance, and management of peatlands in the Peruvian Amazon: implications for conservation

    Schulz, C., Martín Brañas, M., Núñez Pérez, C., Del Aguila Villacorta, M., Laurie, N., Lawson, I. T. & Roucoux, K. H., Jul 2019, In : Biological Conservation. 235, p. 189-198 10 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Basin-scale distribution of harbour porpoises in the Baltic Sea provides basis for effective conservation actions

    Carlén, I., Thomas, L., Carlström, J., Amundin, M., Teilmann, J., Tregenza, N., Tougaard, J., Koblitz, J. C., Sveegaard, S., Wennerberg, D., Loisa, O., Dähne, M., Brundiers, K., Kosecka, M., Kyhn, L. A., Ljungqvist, C. T., Pawliczka, I., Koza, R., Arciszewski, B., Galatius, A. & 9 othersJabbusch, M., Laaksonlaita, J., Niemi, J., Lyytinen, S., Gallus, A., Benke, H., Blankett, P., Skóra, K. E. & Acevedo-Gutiérrez, A., Oct 2018, In : Biological Conservation. 226, p. 42-53 12 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Marine protected areas show low overlap with projected distributions of seabird populations in Britain and Ireland

    Critchley, E. J., Grecian, W. J., Kane, A., Jessopp, M. J. & Quinn, J. L., Aug 2018, In : Biological Conservation. 224, p. 309-317 9 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 258320377