Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Improving quality of life through the routine use of the patient concerns inventory for head and neck cancer patients: baseline results in a cluster preference randomised controlled trial

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Simon Rogers, Christine Allmark, Fazilet Bekiroglu, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Gillon Fabbroni, Robert Flavel, Victoria Highet, Michael W. S. Ho, Gerald Michael Humphris, Terry M. Jones, Owais Khattak, Jeffrey Lancaster, Christopher Loh, Derek Lowe, Cher Lowies, Dominic Macareavy, James Moor, T. K. Ong, A. Prasai, Nicholas Roland & 7 more Cherith Semple, Llinos Haf Spencer, Sank Tandon, Steven J. Thomas, Andrew Schache, Richard J. Shaw, Anastasios Kanatas

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Purpose The main aim of this paper is to present baseline demographic and clinical characteristics and HRQOL in the two groups of the Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI) trial. The baseline PCI data will also be described.

Methods This is a pragmatic cluster preference randomised control trial with 15 consultant clusters from two sites either ‘using' (n = 8) or ‘not using’ (n = 7) the PCI at a clinic for all of their trial patients. The PCI is a 56-item prompt list that helps patients raise concerns that otherwise might be missed. Eligibility was head and neck cancer patients treated with curative intent (all sites, stage of disease, treatments).

Results From 511 patients first identified as eligible when screening for the multi-disciplinary tumour board meetings, 288 attended a first routine outpatient baseline study clinic after completion of their treatment, median (IQR) of 103 (71–162) days. At baseline, the two trial groups were similar in demographic and clinical characteristics as well as in HRQOL measures apart from differences in tumour location, tumour staging and mode of treatment. These exceptions were cluster (consultant) related to Maxillofacial and ENT consultants seeing different types of cases. Consultation times were similar, with PCI group times taking about 1 min longer on average (95% CL for the difference between means was from − 0.7 to + 2.2 min).

Conclusion Using the PCI in routine post-treatment head and neck cancer clinics do not elongate consultations. Recruitment has finished but 12-month follow-up is still ongoing.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages13
JournalBritish Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
VolumeFirst Online
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2020

    Research areas

  • Head and neck cancer, Intervention, Prompt list, Health-related quality of life, Randomised trial, Patient concerns inventory, Cluster preference

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Communication, trust and dental anxiety: a person-centred approach for dental attendance behaviours

    Yuan, S., Freeman, R., Hill, K., Newton, T. & Humphris, G., 13 Oct 2020, In : Dentistry Journal. 8, 4, 11 p., 118.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Loneliness and quality of life after head and neck cancer

    Dahill, A., Al-Nakisbandi, H., Cunningham, K. B., Humphris, G. M., Lowe, D. & Rogers, S. N., 1 Oct 2020, In : British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 58, 8, p. P959-965

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Using a patient prompt list to raise concerns in oncology clinics does not necessarily lead to longer consultations

    Rogers, S. N., Semple, C., Humphris, G. M., Lowe, D. & Kanatas, A., 19 Aug 2020, In : British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. In press

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Best practice in reducing suicide risk in head and neck cancer patients: a structured review

    Twigg, J. A., Anderson, J., Humphris, G. M., Nixon, I., Rogers, S. N. & Kanatas, A., 15 Jul 2020, In : British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. In Press

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

  5. High fear of cancer recurrence in Chinese newly diagnosed cancer patients

    Luo, X., Li, W., Yang, Y., Humphris, G., Zeng, L., Zhang, Z., Garg, S., Zhang, B. & Sun, H., 9 Jun 2020, In : Frontiers in Psychology. 11, 9 p., 1287.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Best practice in reducing suicide risk in head and neck cancer patients: a structured review

    Twigg, J. A., Anderson, J., Humphris, G. M., Nixon, I., Rogers, S. N. & Kanatas, A., 15 Jul 2020, In : British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. In Press

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

  2. Loneliness and quality of life after head and neck cancer

    Dahill, A., Al-Nakisbandi, H., Cunningham, K. B., Humphris, G. M., Lowe, D. & Rogers, S. N., 1 Oct 2020, In : British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 58, 8, p. P959-965

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Using a patient prompt list to raise concerns in oncology clinics does not necessarily lead to longer consultations

    Rogers, S. N., Semple, C., Humphris, G. M., Lowe, D. & Kanatas, A., 19 Aug 2020, In : British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. In press

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. High levels of socioeconomic deprivation do not inhibit patients’ communication of concerns in head and neck cancer review clinics

    Allen, S., Harris, R. V., Brown, S. L., Humphris, G., Zhou, Y. & Rogers, S. N., Jul 2018, In : British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 56, 6, p. 536-539 4 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 267963896

Top